A quick thread on coronavirus restrictions and universities - which are, I was reminded, just 12 weeks away from welcoming students for the new academic year in September.
The postponement of 'freedom day' has a number of serious implications. 1/8
There was a lot of focus on 'double-jabbing' in order to slow the increase in transmission rates in yesterday's briefing.
Will UK-based school leavers be double-jabbed by September? 2/8
Will unis be able to responsible for ensuring that students have been vaccinated (and is there a link between that and the ability to run lectures of up to 500 students; or will those be online only)?
If so, will support be made available? 3/8
Or... is the expectation that students will be vaccinated before returning to Uni (and if so, can that be done)?
Or... perhaps, we start the term and see how it goes; a strategy which failed comprehensively this time last year. 4/8
In relation to international students, the situation is even more uncertain. Will they be able to enter the UK? Will there be quarantine requirements, and, if so, where will students be expected to quarantine and at whose expense? 5/8
To what extent will unis be expected to make provision for international students not able to enter the UK (eg via more blended learning), or will international student access to UK unis remain dependent on the vagaries of the listing system? 6/8
In the event that there are outbreaks of COVID in unis, will we be expected to rely on lateral flow tests, notwithstanding the increasing concern over their utility? 7/8
The Govt's lack of attention to the Uni sector has been all too obvious throughout the pandemic. There is still time to plan effectively for 2021 - and if we want to avoid another year of disruption, it is vital that the work begins now. 8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Brexit is topping the news again today. But it is puzzling to see how the arguments are framed.
We are not 'back in 2019', though we face the same challenges as we did then. 1/7
In case people have forgotten, Brexit was 'done'. The Withdrawal Agreement, the NI Protocol, and, later, the TCA (Trade and Cooperation Agreement) were agreed - by the EU and the UK. 2/7
These agreements involve a lot of commitments on both sides. They establish a set of Committees in which ongoing issues will be addressed. They include dispute resolution procedures. 3/7
The endless comparisons between Boris Johnson and Winston Churchill are wide of the mark.
All the while there has been an obvious historical parallel hiding in plain sight.
Henry VIII. 1/3
✅ Known for his many marriages
✅ Schism with the Church/Treaty of Rome
✅ Investing in the Royal Navy
✅ The divine right of Kings
✅ (For the lawyers...) Clauses
✅ Rocky relations with Chief Ministers 2/3
And, to quote the venerable wikipedia:
✅ An extravagant spender, continually on the verge of financial ruin
✅ Numerous 'costly and largely unsuccessful' wars
✅ Frequently characterised in his later life as a 'lustful, egotistical, paranoid and tyrannical' monarch 3/3
This is a bit different; some thoughts about how we *listen* to people. I'm putting it here because it may, as I'll try to explain, have political resonance. THREAD 1/15
We listen (and read) for lots of different reasons, and in lots of different contexts.
I think that, fundamentally, we can listen in 2 ways, and that those 2 ways are markedly different. 2/
We can listen either from our perspective, with our own frame of reference in place, seeking to work out how what is being said interacts with our own world view. 3/
A quick thread on the Cummings evidence - and what it tells us about Brexit. 1/10
(This is very much a preliminary view; all thoughts very welcome).
The bit I want to focus on is the bit where he rails against the chaos and incompetence at the heart of Govt and the dangers of group-think. If he had hair, he would have been tearing it out. 2/10
His response was to seek to bring in 'talent' from outside. To create a plan and to operationalise it. To galvanise the state into action. 3/10
What is twitter for if not (yet another) hot take on the Cummings Committee evidence?
I'll try to keep it short. 1/6
It is, on its face, a damning indictment of chaos and dysfunction at the heart of Government, which in March, and again in the autumn, cost many thousands of lives. 2/6
But Cummings is an unreliable narrator, full of contradictions. His errors, lies and missteps are excusable. Others': not so much.
His comments on groupthink, playing by the rules, openness and transparency will rightly raise eyebrows. 3/6