I mean, “lessons on systemic racism” is a hilarious inaccurate summary of “critical race theory”
To call it euphemistic would be to give it too much credit even.
They continuously package this ideology in the most benign terms possible. Do they even care about conveying the truth? Not at all. The main goal here is to discredit the resistance.
There’s this stupefyingly benign-sounding code reporters supportive of CRT are basically required to use and OH LOOK here’s some more of it in NBC’s piece
What the fuck is an “equity program” and what do “inclusive policies” actually look like in practice? I’m still reading the piece, but my guess is NBC’s disinfo reporters make no attempt to actually explain what these things are in practical terms.
More benign code stated flatly so as to ease the pill of a divisive and destructive worldview. What do these lessons look like? We have no idea. NBC dutifully short on details and high on coded mantras.
One thing I see continuously in pro-CRT journalism is the idea that the choice is between CRT and not teaching about racism or slavery at all.
It’s a false choice, but here NBC plays its role. Republicans just want to ban “discussion of race in America.”
See here? It’s just a given to NBC that CRT is just “systems to combat racism” … and the reason it HAS to be a given is because the resistance to it has to be painted as racist itself.
(Meanwhile, never mind what these “systems” actually are … we won’t hear in detail.)
But kudos to actually linking to it, NBC, one of these systems are BRT’s
And what are BRT’s? Deputized groups of youths who police thought on campuses!! Where have we seen this idea before in history?
^^^ this illiberal, regressive nonsense is what NBC refers to flatly in copy as “systems to combat racism”
Let that sink in as you read this piece. They are not interested in accurately conveying reality. They exist explicitly to annihilate the perceived opposition.
What is this coded bullshit, an “affinity space for people of color”?
Can you imagine referring to segregated lunch counters as “affinity spaces”?
Say what it is, it’s racially segregated.
Also they “pledged to dismantle racism” — which sounds great — but we don’t hear how
What are these “far right causes”? They sound so scary. If they’re “far,” they must be.
Uhhh, reopening schools, children wearing masks and racially divisive pedagogy.
Lmao, this is a joke
I’m not going to finish this piece, it’s obviously pro CRT propaganda dressed up like journalism, but I will point out two more things.
They gloss over this “anti-discrimination” res, but really, read into it. It’s objectively got its roots in CRT and gender theory
And of course where would we be without the old marxist trope that people resisting marxism can’t really “define it”
There is so much euphemism, coded language and obfuscation in these two @AP paragraphs that a casual reader would have no idea what’s at stake is chemical castration of and grown men exposing themselves to children.
That’s literally what this is about
They want YOU to be SUPPORTIVE of these things. They want to HIDE the reality of these things from YOU, and make YOU feel BAD for opposing them. Don’t let dishonest media outlets mislead you.
Do you want to “restrict the rights of transgender people” = Do you oppose mutilating and chemically castrating children? Do you oppose exposing children to public acts of indecency and sexual deviancy? If you oppose these things, AP wants you to think it’s “restricting rights”
The censorship machine is gearing up hard to come at @libsoftiktok. The simple fact is when prominent disseminators of info cover the weird shit you are doing with kids, it’s the weird shit that’s earning you the attention, NOT the people covering it!
It only took three tweets. People calling for ruthless censorship of the opposition also calling other people nazis, who’d’ve thunk?!
This person works at Harvard’s “Cyber Law” center btw, which is a euphemistic name for a place that specializes in secreting discourse policing.
Wild thought, but: Maybe stop doing weird shit with kids. Maybe that’s the problem. Stop covering your tracks with shitty euphemisms like “gender affirming care.” Stop encouraging them to exclude their parents. Stop giving them body altering hormones. Stop urging surgery.
“This is not about CRT, this is more about equity.” Is perhaps among the more dissonant interpretations of policy.
Big red flag too when media is basically in lockstep telling parents that what they’re seeing — racial affinity groups, racial “equity” initiatives that openly discriminate — and say “actually this is not CRT.”
They’re speaking past parents, deliberately, to obfuscate.
Reporters latch on to this technicality, at best, to summarily dismiss the concerns of parents and, at worst, to cast them as white identitarians.
(Never mind that liberal “equity” policies that openly discriminate based on race are unpopular in general.)
I'm not sure I've ever seen a more shameless treatment. This is basically left wing oppo wholesale. nytimes.com/2021/10/27/us/…
They open the story by basically attacking the mother and her child, who is now an adult and working in politics. It's truly fucking disgusting.
And then there's this recurring gaslight from left wing outlets.
If they're separating kids and teachers into "racial affinity groups" for instruction, if they're doing privilege walks, if they're discussing "whiteness" or "white privilege" as concepts, THEY'RE TEACHING CRT!
This seems super ominous, but all it boils down to is AT&T giving OAN a DirectTV contract not unlike the contracts it gives the “7 or 8” other lefty outlets, among them MSNBC, a network that actively helped whip the public into a frenzy of fire last summer reuters.com/investigates/s…
I know that wider media would never admit it and would find the idea utterly hilarious, but objectively, MSNBC puts out as much misinfo and invective as any other network, OAN included. It’s just that they are part of the media majority, and so they escape similar scrutiny.
You don’t end up with a MAJORITY of self identified democrat Americans believing in mid 2017 that Putin flipped actual vote tallies w/o the likes of MSNBC (and CNN) stoking election conspiracies.