Short thread. This three-byline NBC News piece (by @tylerkingkade, @BrandyZadrozny, & Ben Collins) is the latest MSM attack on critics of woke K-12 education. It covers no new ground but the way it’s framed – identical to other MSM pieces – is telling. 1/ nbcnews.com/news/us-news/c…
You’d think a long story about growing opposition to CRT, “social justice” activism, etc in schools would include a few grafs detailing what people are upset about. What new ideas, exactly, are being taught? How are schools changing curricula? Etc. 2/
You keep waiting for the reporters to describe what people are upset about. But they never do, and obviously it is no oversight. The desire is not just to make the woke revolution seem like nothing, but to make its critics sound like cranks and hysterics. 3/
Thus a parent is caricatured as “disgruntled” and CRT is described merely as “the academic study of racism’s pervasive impact.” The piece refers to “teaching about racism or LGBTQ-inclusive policies.” This isn’t journalism, it’s PR. PR is the opposite of journalism. 4/
This piece, like every MSM piece to date, shows a complete unwillingness to deal with the substance of the issue or why so many parents who have never gotten involved in school boards have suddenly become activists. What are people like @tylerkingkade afraid of? 5/
This kind of coverage is good news for the anti-woke side. It indicates that woke activists have little confidence in their product. If they did, they'd want people to know about it. But this is all a big operation in distraction and concealment. 6/
Wokeism thrives in secrecy, which is why parent activism and getting involved in school boards is so important -- and why it is enraging to NBC News, now on a mission to paint engaged parents as weirdos. Sunshine is the best disinfectant. We know it and they know it. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Trita Parsi is upheld by progressives as a leading foreign policy voice and Middle East expert. He is included in the list of 100 foreign policy "experts" progressives are demanding Biden admin hire. And he's been baselessly claiming Trump will start a war with Iran for years.
THREAD: I’m proud to announce a new foreign policy project I am helping lead, a new group called the Democratic Alliance Initiative. We have several goals: to remind Americans of the foreign policy stakes in the election 1/
To expose the revisionist history and false claims offered as a defense of returning to the Iran deal & peace process; to highlight the threat from China; and to combat the growing reliance of the foreign policy left on narratives and “experts” 2/
What do I mean by the latter? It’s the subject of @AllianceInit’s first offering, a major report titled “Consistently Wrong: Four Years of Failed Foreign Policy Predictions from Obama and Biden Advisors.” Read it here: 3/ allianceinitiative.com/consistently-w…
What accounts for today's historic peace deal? A lot of hard work, for sure. The enormous growth in Israeli economic, military, & demographic power over the last 20 years, definitely. But the key new ingredient is the Trump admin being guided by the right ideas. Short thread. 1/
Since before Israel’s founding, self-described foreign policy “realists” have been anti-Israel, or at least anti US-Israel alliance. Why be friends with the little guy when doing so angers the vastly larger majority in the region, and we need their oil? 2/
This began to change after the Six Day War, and accelerated in 1973 & the early 1980’s, when Israel proved itself a highly capable US client in the Cold War -- using US-supplied arms to defeat Soviet-armed and -trained Arab clients. This was very good for the US. 3/
Why are so many western progressives who posture as Advocates for Peace so upset by the Israel-UAE peace deal? You'd think they’d be happy right now – haven’t they always called for Arab-Israeli peace? Short thread 1/
Well, they never mean it. The progressive/BDS wing of the Democrats – the Squad/Bernie crowd, plus Israel-obsessed activists like Peter Beinart, Codepink, Matt Duss – made themselves bedfellows of Hamas, the PLO, Iran, Turkey, and the Houthis in attacking the deal. 2/
Some progressives are enormously skeptical of Israel’s right to exist and they justify this position with exaggerated and made-up claims about the “occupation” and “war crimes” in order to make it all Israel’s fault, and their hostility seem warranted. 3/
Beirut explosion is in area known to be used by Hezbollah for its long-range precision-guided missile project, which Israel publicly calls a red line. I have no specific knowledge, but would be surprised if explosives that detonated were not associated w/ that project. 1/
Accident or sabotage? Unclear. But one reason explosives were there in 1st place is Obama-Biden nuclear deal, which gave Iran & its terror proxy Hezbollah billions & unleashed them in the region. One of Hezb’s top priorities has been building sophisticated missiles. 2/
The nuclear deal harmed the security of Israel and Arab states alike -- but it was implemented in 2015, Trump admin won the 2016 election, and then reimposed sanctions, cracked down on Iranian terror, and in 2018 pulled out of the nuke deal. 3/
Let’s take a closer look at this offensive lie. Why would someone who works in far-left American politics refer to a religious-national dispute in the Middle East using an irrelevant phrase taken from US domestic politics? It's odd and out of place. What’s going on here?
Maybe Orton is ignorant or misinformed? Not plausible – he prefaced his accusation that Israelis are racists with perfunctory, insincere throat-clearing about his deep concern for the Jewish state. He knows what he’s doing.