I don't have a lot to say about Kevin Hart in particular. There's something important to me about this cultural moment that has nothing to do with him. He is the same. There is a large part of the population who has grown and changed. We are different. And that's a good thing.
We talk a lot about what it means to learn and grow. To a lot of people, it's just lip service. But there are folks who are serious about changing themselves and the environment around them to cause less harm. And it's having an impact.
It's important that we keep perspective though. This path towards addressing the harmful parts of our culture is a very big shift. The more successful we are at this, the more upheaval and angst and opposition we should expect. That is the nature of change.
I also want to put things firmly into context. When we push comedians and other entertainers to be more mindful with their content, we are centering those who are usually marginalized in our society. We are saying we will not build our culture on their backs.
What we get in response is those who have the power and money telling us we should center them instead. They want us to be more concerned about them, because they made slightly less money and have slightly less fame, than we are for the most disadvantaged people in our community.
This is to be expected. But it's instructive for us to understand what happens when we center the most vulnerable in our society. The way it causes those in power to behave. We ask simply to let people live in peace, and it creates conflict where none should exist.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For me this brings to mind something I've been reading about in Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Freire goes into detail on what he calls the "banking model" of education. Where students are empty vessels that we deposit knowledge into.
This is the style that has become dominant in Western education. Freire explains why and how it serves to support and maintain systems of oppression. The teacher is held as an infallible actor. And the way students learn is by deferring to the teacher on all things.
First off, we can see how this model of uni-directional passing of knowledge supports this statement of one teacher for 300-400 students. The students have no say in their education. There's no interaction. They're just absorbing input from the teacher.
This is worth highlighting as a feature of both imperialism and Whiteness. The fundamental belief that there is no objective morality. And instead right and wrong are defined by who you are. As a result, morality becomes a function of who has more power.
This is what we're getting at when we say "history is written by the winners". It's not a simple statement. It's about how those with power actively rewrite the rules of morality to serve themselves.
We see this throughout history. Part of what it means to be in power is having the ability to absolve yourself of accountability. Historically, morally, legally, economically, socially. You can literally do no wrong.
Something I think about a lot. There's a whole part of the populace that gravitated towards "centrism" and "middle ground" kind of politics. It stems from our tendency towards binary thinking. E.g. "both sides", "two extremes". But at the root of it is a desire to avoid conflict.
The phrase "avoid conflict" evokes some feelings, but mostly sounds like a good thing. If we say "conflict avoidance", that evokes a different reaction. And we can start to see that trying to find the "middle" in a conflict that needs to be resolved is often counterproductive.
The conflict between white people and non-white people. Between Owners and workers. The conflict between oppressors and those they seek to oppress. These conflicts can't be avoided. They can't be swept under the rug. They are core to our society and must be faced.
A reminder. Nobody is pushing to CRT in k-12 schools. Nobody. This is an entirely fabricated "controversy". It's a clear example of how white supremacy is used to manipulate white people.
Sometimes it's just rhetoric that means something see. But in this case, I think we have to learn to take these folks at their word. They think their children are going to be taught to hate America and to hate themselves for being white.
These folks already fervently believe in the power of propaganda and conditioning to make people behave a certain way. That is how they operate. So naturally they would take it very seriously if they felt that was being used against them.
Whew. I remember being young. You couldn’t convince me I didn’t already understand everything. It was impossible to get me to listen to something I wasn’t ready to hear. I remember the feeling. When I reflect on it today, I had to *learn* how to be open to new information.
It’s helpful to think about listening as a skill you can develop. Not only so you can actively get better at. But also because you can do it with intentionality. You can decide that what you want to do is *seek* better understanding on a subject so you can grow.
But it also you allows you to be more intentional about when you are *not* listening. Not every message is worth hearing. It’s okay to not listen to messages you know are harmful. That’s how you avoid manipulation. What we want is to develop better judgment about which is which.
I've been thinking a lot about the labor "shortage" in lower wage industries. I feel like we are re-learning something important about movements of the past. I may screw this up. But let me try to explain.
What we see happening today is that industries that have been underpaying for decades are now finding it hard to re-hire now that they want to recover from the (ongoing) pandemic.
There are lots of reasons people aren't going back. But one claim is that they're living off unemployment and that means they don't need the low wages provided by work. That's why Owners are petitioning the government to cut unemployment. To force people back into desperation.