Darrell Owens Profile picture
Jun 15, 2021 11 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Here Comes The Big Boss!

Tonight at Berkeley City Council we're mobilizing to get council to support SB 9, two-family housing only in single-family zones. It'll be early in the meeting. NIMBYs will show--will you?

Tonight at 6 PM
Zoom: us02web.zoom.us/j/87908681987
Key args below
⬇️
1: Research from UC Berkeley's Urban Displacement Project has compiled virtually all major peer-reviewed housing studies and revealed that building all-income housing ranks as the #1 strategy to combat displacement. Including their own research.
urbandisplacement.org/sites/default/…
2: Micro survey data from the 5-year Census reveals sampled residents who live in duplexes, even recently built ones, in the Oakland-Berkeley area earn a household income significantly less than single-family renters and homeowners (h/t @UrbFuturistDem ; github.com/UrbFutDem/IBTP…)
3: SB 9 is endorsed by the Nonprofit Housing Association of Northern California, the statewide consortium of all low income housing developers in the Bay Area who actually build affordable housing. Listen to Affordable Housing developers about doing their job.
4: SB 9 is opposed by exclusionary rich suburbs in CA. Additionally, SB 9 was approved by the Senate and every single no vote was from a Republican. Our neighbor Oakland has endorsed SB 9.
Does Berkeley stand with Low Income builders and Oakland or Beverly Hills and the GOP?
5: Under SB 9, duplexes cannot be built in places where:
- High firezones (Section 1, Line 2)
- Tenants occupying a single-family home (Section 1, Line 3-C)
- Within 3 years after a tenant vacates
This would be a massive expansion in protection statewide
leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavC…
6: Berkeley and Oakland is abolishing exclusionary zoning for four-family housing but cant do it alone. SB 9 ensures at the very least that other municipalities allow two-family housing on lots.
7 (last): Single family zoning was invented in Berkeley with the purpose of keeping out renters and POC. Today, it correlates heavily with white and rich areas. Berkeley received national recognition to declaring its end and has a responsibility to lead the way on its abolition.
You'll only have 1 minute so make it good and pick one or two to focus on. Especially speak up and note on record then you live multifamily housing, that 51% of Berkeley is zoned for duplexes or higher, and if you have housing struggles now or past *please* state them to council.
This is was a two family home under construction in Berkeley looks like. Why in the world would we oppose this and mandate it only for one family instead?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Darrell Owens

Darrell Owens Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IDoTheThinking

Sep 13
2023 Census estimates just released.
Top 11 fastest growing CA cities from 2019 vs. 2023.
Bakersfield +29217
Irvine +27,228
Menifee +18,687
Roseville +17,634
Victorville +16,472
Fresno +14,136
Sacramento +12,763
Clovis +11,251
Santa Clarita +11,064
Visalia +10,397
Merced +10,019
Top 11 most shrunk CA cities from 2023 vs 2019.
Los Angeles -158,574
San Francisco -72,561
San Jose -52,171
San Diego -35,540
Santa Ana -21,809
Arden-Arcade -17,293
Fremont -14,906
Long Beach -13,149
East LA -12,987
Riverside -12,514
Glendale -12,269
Obviously a lot of loss in tech heavy S.V. and Los Angeles proper but interesting variations going on with neighboring cities:
Oakland: +3,464
Berkeley: -2,391
Bakersfield: + 29,217
Santa Monica: -462
San Bernardino: +7,926
Antioch : +5,591
Fairfield: +3,628
Fresno: +13,136
Read 12 tweets
Aug 31, 2023
In my reading and convos with abolitionist scholars at UCSC, the immediate proposals to reduce material causes of crime is good. But the lofty, more visionary ideology of no incarceration falls into the same theory issues of Anarchism where states are undesirably re-defined.
i think its like an twitter/online thing because in abolitionist adjacent courses (led by Angela Davis) they didnt focus much on stateless, no jail ever utopias twitter talks a lot about but instead how crime is often materially motivated, directly and indirectly, and prevention
Once harm is done, what distinguishes prison abolitionists from reformists is the idea that incarceration by the state will never rectify the issue. I'm far more a statist than an anarchist and don't agree. But they say the more important convo is prevention before reaction.
Read 4 tweets
Jun 25, 2023
The co-housing experiments in Berkeley, Fremont and Sacramento where residents pools money to build new homes and removes the for profit developer -- collectivist development -- all cant afford to provide low cost affordable housing at current construction costs.
People who'd just mandate higher affordability should reflect on why communal development where housing is priced at cost are closing in on $1 mil. And that things deemed deregulatory like upzoning, streanlining, removing reqs etc would be done in a socialist system as well.
Its beyond supply and demand pricing; low price ceiling absent a subsidy wouldnt even work.
The workers are making their own housing, and they are achieving several $100,000s cheaper than market prices, but still Berkeley and Fremont are ranging $800k - $1 mil, Sac $400k - $600k
Read 8 tweets
Jun 10, 2023
I despise protected right turn lanes they are trash and should be banned. Every time i gotta play chicken with speeding drivers trying to make quick rights without stopping *just* so that i can press the beg button on a tiny lil concrete island flanked on all sides by traffic. Image
The one by Milpitas BART is more egregious than anything because BART or VTA has that stupid fence hiding vacant land so the drivers come flying in blind.
This is newly built infrastructure and traffic engineering seems to be pushing for drivers to never have to stop when taking a right turn on a street. Its not a freeway, all 90 degree turns should require a stop beforehand.
Read 4 tweets
May 26, 2023
Ok, now the Citi Bike story is 100% clear to me.

The teens were riding the bikes and docked them / ended their ride to basically avoid a charge when you take the rent-a-bikes out for too long. Its why I dont use those bikes cause they're strict.
1 /
The teens sit on the docked bikes. The bikes no longer belong to them but they see fit to sit on them because they're about to undock them again in a few mins and if dont sit on them, someone will undock and *they wont have one. This is a nothing burger.
(* key dispute here)
So pregnant lady comes up and sees the kids squatting on the e-bikes. She asks for one, none give theirs up. She uses the "im pregnant so give up your seat up" logic w/ e-bikes but the boys don't budge. I've seen this a million times on transit. Again a nothing burger.
Read 11 tweets
May 17, 2023
I cant believe "scare the Soviets" is real. Yeah they worked on the Manhattan project for years to scare Stalin's dumbass & no president or general ever wrote it in their diary. Hiroshima was evil but no American cared about scaring the Soviets who Truman wanted to enter the war.
The atomic bombs were dropped because it was the most expensive weapon in history of government and they intended to use it against a nation the homefront fanatically hated. Not to scare Stalin. Not to avoid a land invasion or anything else.
And thats supported by Leslie Groves who led the atomic bombings and had a bloodlust thing going on. When Truman's dumbass realized the bombs were used primarily against civilian targets he ordered the atomic enrichment to stop but lied publicly and acted like it was his idea.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(