Listen, if you watched Bret’s Ivermectin video and you still have any respect for his understanding of science… 😩. The dude doesn’t understand basic science. He may as well be wearing a white coat and a stethoscope. He’s a cosplay scientist.
Like the bald entrepreneur explains he heard a story from his carpet cleaner that he had a heart attack two minutes after getting the Pfizer vaaccine and the cleaner’s wife got a shakey hand after hers. He says this would be impossible if the vaccine was safe .
How is anyone with a basic understanding of science nodding along to that? 1) it’s second hand anecdotes, that they didn’t verify, 2) even if true there is no evidence of a causal relationship, 3) it is perfectly possible for the claims to be true and the vaccines to be safe.
Let me elaborate: let’s say the house cleaner was unlucky and did have a heart attack just after the vaccine. He is shocked at this and talks with his wife about how she is feeling. She didn’t have a heart attack but now she’s worried, and she did notice her hand was shaking…
…recently, and wasn’t that after she got the vaccine? Viola! You now have the ingredients for the story and no one is intentionally lying it’s just people drawing unwarranted conclusions based on bad reasoning. If any of the vaccines did routinely cause immediate heart attacks..
…then we would know about it. Think about what happened with the J&J vaccine when they detected some extremely rare adverse reactions. Remember the abundance of caution? If there was a spike in immediate heart attacks doctors and public health officials would notice.
They haven’t noticed because it doesn’t happen and it doesn’t even mechanically make sense. How would an mRNA vaccine generate an immediate heart attack? And this is just one basic point. The video is 3hrs of getting this stuff wrong.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
