There are some words I use a lot, as tools, whose actual meaning (as in the discriminatable bounds of their usage and application) I might be hard-pressed to define. "Moral" is definitely one.
The sense is something like "contributing towards
the narrative function of establishing an order of values". I don't often use "moral" to mean "good"; I often use it to mean "salient within the process of determining what 'good' is"
And often, in that sense, I'm using it critically, to note where one genre of discourse - narration organised around the purpose of discovering or demonstrating value - is aliasing another (e.g. factual description).
There's an argument this aliasing is always going on - we are always mixing up fact and value, all theories about what is the case are tangled up with theories about what ought to be the case - but I think the moral and the factual are distinct centres of narrative gravity
Hence, for example, in the previous thread, my premise is that a moral image of sexual difference (a Mars/Venus-type typology) is a different kind of thing to a scientific image (description of biological systems), and it's bad for the former to alias the latter
I also think that "gender" is not distinctly either of these things: phenotypic sex is a tall stack of effects, with all kinds of weird feedback loops between levels, in which psychology and social organisation are cogs in the same apparatus as endocrine and anatomical variance
In a way, gender is a machine "for" mixing up fact and value, producing a being whose functioning in the world is distributed across ontological strata. It has multiple centres of gravity - a three-body problem, if you like (what would be the third?)
(the answer is possibly "the spiritual", another word I use a lot without quite being able to explain what it means - if I were a Hegelian I might have a better story for this...)
Anyway, there's a difference between mixing of genres, and aliasing of one by another (or what Badiou calls "suture": one genre becomes the "driver" for another). Everything in the human world has a moral aspect, but it's still bad to suture e.g. factual description to morality.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with a gnarled woodland spirit

a gnarled woodland spirit Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(