A coalition of 80 scholarly and educational organizations joined us @PENamerica issuing a pubic statement today voicing firm opposition to the troublesome "divisive concepts" legislation around the country. nytimes.com/2021/06/16/art…
"Educators owe students a clear-eyed, nuanced, and frank delivery of history so that they can learn, grow, and confront the issues of the day, not hew to some state-ordered ideology." Read the full statement and signatories here: pen.org/joint-statemen…
We write: "A white-washed view of history cannot change what happened in the past. A free and open society depends on the unrestricted pursuit and dissemination of knowledge."
Grateful to @AHAhistorians@AAUP and @aacu who partnered with us in authoring the statement, calling out these state-level bills for the threat they pose to education in a democracy.
It's clear anti-CRT bills are already impeding academic freedom and teaching around the country, in different ways.
Some examples:
In Oklahoma, a fully enrolled summer college course on 'race and ethnicities' has been outright dropped. koco.com/article/oklaho…
In Idaho, Boise State abruptly suspended 52 sections of a class on diversity and ethics b/c of an odd complaint. Investigators later found nothing... but 1300+ students had their course interrupted and made 'asynchronous'. insidehighered.com/news/2021/03/1…
In Iowa, the DoE cancelled a whole conference on “Social Justice and Equity in Education" b/c of the "divisive concepts" bill there. Note, this was not b/c it was yet law-- people were "mindful" of the pending law. This is how 'chilling' of speech works. iowapublicradio.org/state-governme…
Last week, we @PENamerica called the suspension of a diversity and ethics class at Boise State "unfathomable" -- an extreme reaction to halt over 50 classes for 1,300 students. Glad to see @michelleinbklyn discuss the issues surrounding it today: nyti.ms/3w48rPg
The classes were cancelled b/c of the alleged existence of a video of ONE zoom class where a student was degraded. That's unfortunate and concerning, yes, but University overreacted. Cancelled everything w/o actually seeing video. & there were no formal complaints lodged over it.
This week the University announced that the classes would no longer be suspended... But the catch is that they're being run asynchronously, while an external law firm conducts an investigation. So the classes aren't exactly suspended but they also aren't exactly running as normal
Today's Executive Order instructs various federal agencies to take "appropriate steps" to ensure universities which receive federal research and education grants promote "free inquiry" and comply with other laws, incl the First Amendment. Here's why that's a problem. THREAD.
One, the language is completely vague. There is no further guidance on what steps would be 'appropriate' or what 'free inquiry' means. Apparently agencies might make their own guidelines to ensure compliance. That's a recipe for inconsistent interpretation and confusion.
Second, universities are enormous, decentralized beasts. The idea of tying research funds from a grant won by an individual faculty member to the decisions of administrators or faculty with regard to "free inquiry" in general is overly punitive, nonsensical, absurd.