WTF. #AbigailShrier

Also, I enjoyed My Little Ponies in middle age. Call yourself childish, Abigail.
I'm reading this Shrier piece--follow Merkin's link if you're curious--and an obvious pattern is this.

#AbigailShrier reports with benevolence and understanding on these children's disabilities and mental health struggles UNLESS it's gender dysphoria.
She has detailed paragraphs to build good will from readers based on how supportive she is (and the parents she portrays are) in relation to a child's or teenager's autism, eating disorder, suicidal ideation, self-harm, insomnia, anxiety, depression, PTSD.

Shrier accepts those.
But as soon as the suggestion of gender dysphoria enters the picture?

It's the devil!

A sudden possession of spirit that can't be real!

Exorcise!

The pattern of skewed story-telling is that transparent.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Katja Thieme 👀

Dr. Katja Thieme 👀 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Katja_Thieme

16 Jun
Just yesterday I wrote a wee theoretical thread on the concept of good faith. And today, I receive the apposite gift of the arguer who knows to smile in good faith while trying to stab you at the same time.

Here are some fun aspects of the pattern. Image
1. Asks questions that sound serious and and at first curious and sincere, but that only ever end up requiring extra work of you while he is never offering any work of his own (beyond the well-trained talking points that are the basis of his questions).
2. When you’re not immediately forthcoming with the work he asked for, the questions will turn nasty. Can’t you answer? Here’s another question. Can’t you answer that either? Are you not capable of it? What are you, a fraud?
Read 13 tweets
16 Jun
Yes. This is a policy I‘d fully support.

🔥🔥🔥

Also, set a base cost-of-living for college/uni students, then give it to those who supply documentation of their own & their parents‘ finances that shows they can’t fund themselves. Simplify award funding & feed into the bursary.
Honestly, I think North American higher education has gone way way overboard with topical awards and special prizes and conditional scholarships. It ties up so many resources: dept staff who could be doing other things, profs who could use the time researching and teaching.
Have staff dedicated to checking documentation and distributing the bursaries to students across the institution. Tell students upfront this is what they can get, save yourself a whole set of specialized communications for each different award.
Read 5 tweets
16 Jun
"Billionaire businessman and right-wing political donor Richard Uihlein, who owns the shipping supply company Uline, gave $400,000 to the FDRLST Media Foundation. Conservative funding vehicle DonorsTrust contributed $249,000, and the Thomas W. Smith Foundation added $150,000.
"The three known donors to the FDRLST Media Foundation also fund the nonprofit behind the news site RealClearPolitics. The Real Clear Foundation has been around for a number of years and took in close to $3.8 million in 2019, roughly $500,000 more than the year before."
"From 2015-19, the Real Clear Foundation received $5.1 million from DonorsTrust, $850,000 from the Ed Uihlein Foundation, and $450,000 from the Thomas W. Smith Foundation. Other Real Clear donors include the Charles Koch Foundation and the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation."
Read 5 tweets
15 Jun
On the concept of good faith.

Let's contrast two views.

View 1. Good faith as interactional tool. Be nice. Remain polite. Summarize the other's views strongmanly.

If your own views are quite different, you could exhibit this kind of good faith almost to the point of trolling.
In fact, some perceive it as trolling and will complain about that.

Say you want to listen. You want to learn. (Whether you do or not.) Genuinely, you want to understand. You have one more question. And another question.

All might go well.

Or not.
View 2. Good faith as faithful attitude. Say what you think. Be honest about your feelings. You owe it to your interlocutor to make your views clear.

If those views are views directly critical of your interlocutor's, oh boy. You may be accused of misrepresenting their views.
Read 6 tweets
15 Jun
Jimmy Concepts thinks that the concept of structure in critical race theory refers to (1) structuralism in language (!!!)—which he thinks is postmodernism saying there is no agency (!!!)—and (2) Marx’s superstructure (!!!).

ROFL.

ROFL.

*gasps for air*

*laughs louder still*
I really cannot express how funny that is.

His words are a salad mixed from miniature children’s toys and clown figurines.
The salad bowl. And a closeup of well-tossed clown faces.
Read 9 tweets
14 Jun
„Around the country, parents are showing up to school board meetings to protest what they call communism. It's worth seeking out local newspaper articles and reading quotes from those parents to see how they understand the ghost ideology they're objecting to.“
HT to Kevin for the idea of the above tweet.

Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(