Thread by @Naley___

You know what? Fuck it. I want to watch this shit, so let's do a live Twitter watch of Jimmy Snow's video so you guys don't have to watch it.

He's starts off by stating that he is a friend of Gabbie's, but not Rachel's. His hand feels forced to make this video because of what's being said about him. He hates drama, but his channel is suffering due to the slander. He resents his video is going to make Rachel look bad.

Rachel is a lying/misrepresenting him. He was MUCH closer to Rachel than Gabbie. He's upset about the interview she gave, but he MUST address it.

He doesn't want anyone going to Rachel on his behalf to say "you lied about Jimmy" yeah, no one is doing that.

"Never have people once said, Jimmy what is your part of the story!"

He's upset that there will be no accountability for the people weighing in on the situation and commenting. 😏

"There's so many people saying 'I'm so surprised you did this', but not saying I'm so surprised their saying you did this"

"I don't agree with everything Gabbie has done, we've had heated arguments about it..... not all over Twitter, but"

"If either rachel or I really wanted to hurt eachother, we could." Says he knows A LOT about Rachel, and if they were driven to hurt eachother, they could. He makes a veiled threat, and then says he's not trying to make a veiled threat.

It turned out their friendship wasn't what he thought it was, so he left it. He'd be open to a conversation. I'm 9 minutes in and he has stated numerous times that this video will make Rachel look bad.

He hasn't watched anything Gabbie has said about him or Rachel because he "can't find it" let me help you out here sport, since you clearly have no desire to put any research into your videos, or have the full picture before you speak on it:

He says from heresy it sounds like Gabbie was "just an angry person says angry things" he does he say that if Gabbie said anything not in the messages he's going to read, it's not true. Again, feel free to watch:

He vocalized to Gabbie that he didn't agree with her calling Rachel a bitch. He expressed that to her the one time they spoke about this situation. He basically said it seems like she was at her wits end and "there are things about her wanting to hit back at people who hurt her

That I don't bother me. But there are some things in there that do"

He never saw the stories, because he has no desire to be involved in any of it. He's making this video to clear his name, as the pressure to speak out is overwhelming.

No one is checking 4 you

Black Wolf's thumbnail is clickbait, "could be a good guy, could be a terrible guy"

All the screenshots aren't out there, despite Rachel saying that they are.

He's going to go over the messages. He regrets sending the initial message because of all that came from it.

He sent the message because he saw tweets on Twitter talking about this review, none of it was constructive, and the tweets were hurting Gabbies feelings.

"Gabbie can roll with the punches better than most people can, because she's one of the most hated people on the internet."

Yeah, she REALLY takes it in stride.

Gabbie is "not even his most controversial friend" and we would be shocked at who he associates with.

So, more controversial than rape apologist, abusive, gaslighting, victimizing, invalidating, ABUSERS.... what an accepting guy!

"We should be friends with unsavory characters, so we can change them"

He has never seen a single Rachel video where she has reviewed poetry, nor did he read Gabbie's book even though she sent it to him. He seems like a very supportive friend!

Gabbies entire book is about 200 words, but fuck it.

He's criticizing Rachel's criticism.

He assumed Rachel's videos were mean spirited and offered no constructive criticism, because her tweets about the book weren't nice.

Again, you could have watched her video and actually informed yourself, but it doesn't seem like he's super into researching what he speaks on.

He shows a clip of Rachel saying she felt a bit manipulated by his message, and that it seemed to be a misunderstanding.

Which given the fact that the video was already out, this message DOES read manipulative. He didn't say he didn't watch it, or even say he didn't know it

Was out. Leading Rachel to believe that Gabbie watched it and was upset. Again, if he had researched or put 2 seconds of thought into the situation, the message would A) be different, or not even sent. Rachel is not responsible for what you do or do not do, or how you come

Across if you don't have all the information and don't relay that.

"Rachel knows me. She didn't know I had autism back then, but people know now.

Rachel also has autism.

He's cleared up all these miscommunications several times now, and she's still lying.

He's pointing out that Rachel uses overly negative language, and that painted a picture of her in his head.

It's a mystery to him why Gabbie sent Rachel to book. He said Gabbie said she sent it in good faith. He thought sending it was a stupid idea.

Him and Gabbie have spoken twice in 2021, they don't talk all the time

They were in the middle of privately doing, and Rachel ignored the message (from her FRIEND) and started to post to Twitter.

He cared about Rachel SO much, that he went and attacked a creator that "was being awful to her" and he "put his reputation on the line to do so"

Wow, Rachel should kiss this man's ass for being a good friend and doing what was right. Do better, Rachel. 🙄

"As a friend I loved Rachel, we were closer than most people."

Loved her so much he backed an absolute monster he's spoken to twice this year.

He felt like he had to reply because Rachel was implying that Gabbie sent him to talk to her.

Again, given the context of the message, and the fact that you didn't even know the video was UP or what her reviews were LIKE, everyone agreed with the way she took it.

Side note, this man is SO condescending and hollies than thou just proving how WILLFULLY ignorant he is about everything that's gone on. People watch him?

"Rachel was using a version of the conversation that wasn't true"

YOU. DID. NOT. SPECIFY. ANYTHING. TO. HER. The video was UP, you made no mention that you didn't know the video was up, nor did you watch it. Your entire argument is based on MOUNTAINS OF CONTEXT YOUVE PURPOSELY

IGNORED. Any logic person would have drawn the same conclusions as Rachel, with no contrary context?! My GOD.

He was upset, because Gabbie was getting MORE hate. That's why he identified himself. He's such a fierce friend, he had to sort it out.

Side note, for someone that prides himself on his "controversial" friendships, it sure was easy for him to throw away his much closer friend for "misinterpreting" and venting about a conversation she kept anonymous. Yet chooses to back Gabbie. Sure.

"If something seems really uncharacteristic of me, that should be your first clue that it's not true"

Ok, Shane Dawn, David Dobrik, GlamnGore, etc!

No one knows who you are. It is ridiculously easy to hide who you are online behind a persona.

He's white knighting for Gabbie, saying that she receives non stop hate, most of which she doesn't deserve.

There are some things she's done that he doesn't agree with, but that won't stop him from being her friend.

Gabbies trying to put on a brave face when she says things like she's "trolling" she embraces people hating her, because it's too hurtful if not.

"I think if 99% of those people (haters) had a private conversation with Gabbie, would feel really bad about what Gabbie goes through"

Let's take a second to look at some private conversations Gabbie has had with others:

1) Her speaking with Oscar Wylde about him LIKING A TWEET.
2) Threatening @helloleesh who was a (at the time) 26k channel with "war" for wanting to explain her side of the story. Here's some context:

3-5) An unprovoked message sent to Jen Dent on Christmas day
6) Harassing Jessi Smiles, the woman she has abused and bullied for 7 years, (here's some more context to that: ) spreading FALSE child r*pe allegations against Jen Dent.

"The amount of hate Gabbie gets she does not deserve, even when she's in the wrong."

Again, let's put this here:

He is speaking about his autism and how it affects him, and how it can muddle his thoughts

Again, Rachel is also autistic.

He is "far more upset when people hurt his friends, than when they hurt him."

Which is obviously why he threw away that "much closer" friendship so quickly, had nothing to say when Gabbie viciously attacked her, and is, again, piling on to the harassment train towards her. 👍

More talking himself into a corner because he did no prior research before any of this took place.

In response to this message from Rachel, he says that she "seemed so cold and out of character that he wasn't surprised that in the interview she said there was other stuff going on"

Now he's talking about how much she cries, and it's bizarre that she'd have no compassion for

others that cry.

This is disgusting and wildly manipulative. Fuck this guy.

Again, talking about how he knows nothing about the fucking situation, because he didn't bother to watch 5 minutes of his close friends youtube video.

He doesn't care about poetry, and he makes sure to say that at least 10 times.

Says that if he had more context (a solely HIM problem) he would have come at the situation differently.

Now he's talking about Gabbie crying to him too 🤨

While Rachel is explaining her side, he laughs and says "I just don't respond to points that don't matter to me"

Who watches this absolute unresearched, manipulative, asshole?

"The problem here is that she says she's done, but then she gets drunk and starts tweeting"

I REALLY don't think that's the problem.

The message he sent back to her seems relatively fair and understandable to me. However, given all the context, willfull ignorance, and deflecting he has done prior to reading this message, negates any sympathy.

Rachel's response:

His response to "did you miss all the times I publicly said...." was happily "yes, of course I did"

He goes on "yes I missed that too, but none of this matters to the original point"

It all matters to the original point, that being your initial message

and the insertion into the drama. He is SO proud of himself for doing zero research, and having zero context. He is an absolute joke.

He's saying that he didn't infer anything that she's saying.

He's saying that he can count on one hand how many people care about him, so when Rachel said said the "unlike you thing, it emotionally hit him like a knife"

Sharing this screenshot of his reply really hurts him:

He's feeling very sorry for himself..... while he lights the girl he already publicly ran over, on fire.

Also, just so everyone knows. "YOU LIAR, *I* BLOCKED *YOU*!"

1 point douchebag.

He specifies that he doesn't know who blocked who actually, but this small detail seems very important to Gabb- I mean him.

"I'm already really good at arguing"

Where?

He's upset at Rachel for not understanding and listening to HIM... when he had no idea what her review was like, that the video was even up, and the fact that she understandably misinterpreted those messages because of it. Got it.

He doesn't know how to use Twitter enough to find Rachel's drunk tweets. Are his videos just shower thoughts?

He's "very proud" of himself for the way he acted in this situation.

This message might hold some weight or be understandable, if he AGAIN, did not insert himself into this drama TWICE, disregard the things she said because he "doesn't respond to points he doesn't care about", or do the smallest bit of research.

Rachel made a fair, concise

poetry critique. Something she does all the time. The entitlement and nerve of this asshole is beyond.

He's upset because Rachel is still telling her version of events.

Again, nothing he says in this situation holds any weight, because things turned our the way they did BECAUSE he didn't bother to watch, research, or put the slightest bit of effort into his close friendship.

Now he's talking about how flirty him and Rachel used to be.

That, along with her always crying, is really important information that he feels compelled to share.

He's smugly stating that people write him off because "you're a piece of shit that's friends with Gabbie Hanna"

YES, you're a piece of shit because you're friends with and defend Gabbie Hanna. Are you going to cruise high schools with James Charles next? Your online are so edgy

"And again, I am friends with much worse than Gabbie Hanna"

He says he has adequately shown his side, and it would be ridiculous for anyone to accuse him of what they've been saying.

LOL sweetie? If anything this video has made you look a MILLION times worse. He did no research, had zero context, and knew nothing of what he was speaking

on. At no time in the beginning did he make thid fully aware to Rachel, and then shit talked her when SHE misinterpreted him. He defended his "controversial" friend Gabbie, and put all of this on Rachel for literally doing his job. He was manipulative, belittling, and smug

throughout the entire video. He shared her constant crying, that they used to flirt, he questioned her character and tried to paint himself as a martyr for STARTING this specific drama. He condemned Rachel again and again, but did not ONCE condemn Gabbie for the abusive, horrible

things she said to Rachel on his behalf. Despite him being much closer to Rachel, and still caring for her. He's disgusting, and he's a piss poor Youtuber. That is all.