Share this page!

Steve Westlake Profile picture
Twitter logo
18 Jun, 5 tweets, 3 min read
Important new study finds there is "no strong reason to shrink away from campaigns designed to increase individual action to reduce GHG emissions as they are often seen as complements rather than substitutes for transformative climate policy." 1/

sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
The study adds nuance to the debate about whether to focus on individual change or system/political changes when it comes to the climate crisis. (It's not either or of course) @GreggRSparkman @Shahzeen @KHayhoe @michaelemann @StuartBCapstick @KevinClimate @GretaThunberg 2/
"Individual behavior change is a necessary part of the overall solution, although not sufficient alone, and we find engaging or reflecting on such change rarely leads to a belief that climate policy is unnecessary." 3/
"In fact, our studies suggest that campaigns to make lifestyle changes can help reach policy goals if they lead people to reflect on their behaviors in a way that is connected to their values or identity." 4/
h/t @ThierryAaron for highlighting the study. 5/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Steve Westlake

Steve Westlake Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @steviedubyu

Steve Westlake Profile picture
25 Feb
Should billionaires be "shamed" for their trend-setting contributions to planetary destruction?

The graphic below ranks billionaire emissions. It makes Gates, Bezos and Musk look quite good.

So I've added a graphic that includes the average global citizen (5t CO2)
Equity and fairness are said to be essential parts of tackling the environmental crises, so this matters.
It was actually quite tricky to put the billionaires' emissions in context of the global average because Excel only lets you zoom out to 10%, which still doesn't show the average person's emissions as anything more than a tiny slither.
Read 8 tweets
Steve Westlake Profile picture
8 Dec 20
A short thread on the risks of countries claiming to be "climate leaders":

The image of the heroic leader is ubiquitous in our popular culture, politics, business and media. This results in a tendency to exaggerate the role of leaders in both successes and failures.
An emphasis on heroic leadership can also lead to “learned helplessness” and dependency among followers. Thus followers use leaders to insulate themselves against uncomfortable feelings, and project hope and responsibility onto leaders.
Gemmill and Oakley say there is an inherent “deskilling” process in follower-leader situations, with followers becoming less functional as they attribute responsibility to the leader. Hence why bold national claims of climate leadership are risky. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00…
Read 7 tweets
Steve Westlake Profile picture
3 Nov 20
The pushback on @Shell's "blame-the-consumer" tweet has been brilliant and represents real progress. Long may it continue.

But...

...we do still need to talk about consumers and carbon footprints, and not give the highest emitters a free pass.

Thread
Because “consumers” are not some horizontal mass of equal beings. The disparities between the biggest and the smallest carbon footprints are absolutely vast.

The Martini glass of inequity highlights this well...
2/
The biggest consumers really are a problem for climate change. Not only do they (or we) make an oversize contribution to emissions, they also set the agenda, steer social norms, and influence what climate mitigation options are deemed acceptable. 3/ nature.com/articles/s4155…
Read 13 tweets
Steve Westlake Profile picture
27 Jun 20
Good news! Many of those who dropped litter had bought litter offsets that will, with luck, stop others littering in future. And some said they are confident Negative Litter Technologies (NLTs) will clear up lots of litter in a few decades's time.😉 standard.co.uk/news/uk/bourne…
A UK litterer said, “Actually, we are world leaders in cutting one type of litter. But we really can't control the litter from things we consume.”🤷

One of the litterers was visiting from the US. He said simply, “The American way of littering is not up for negotiation.” 🤐
An Aussie on the beach brandished a piece of litter and said: “This is litter. Don’t be afraid. Don’t be frightened.” 🤠
Read 6 tweets
Steve Westlake Profile picture
10 Mar 20
Last Sunday was a special but sad day. From 5am-5pm I was up in a beautiful 150-year-old tree in Cardiff, trying to help many others save it from the developers’ chainsaws. Ultimately though, we failed.
Thread 1/n
There were tears. On the street below local people cried as they cut the neighbouring tree first. My tears came at 2pm when the chainsaws backed away and I thought we may have won, but I was mistaken… 2/
They started to cut the tree down while I was still in it. Such is the dead-eyed resolve of the development machine. (You can see the pictures and videos from @XRCardiff @nspugh and others.) 3/
Read 19 tweets
Steve Westlake Profile picture
6 Jun 19
@keithalexander @LeeEnviron @tomhillonline @KevinClimate @ClimateBeard @MichaelEMann @penn_state @USATODAY Here's another take (from Nature Climate Change) on why personal behaviour change, particularly among elites, is crucial: "The lifestyles and consumption patterns of the super-rich strongly influence the globally growing middle classes..."
1/n
 nature.com/articles/s4155…
@keithalexander @LeeEnviron @tomhillonline @KevinClimate @ClimateBeard @MichaelEMann @penn_state @USATODAY "... who emulate upper-class consumption styles to distinguish themselves from lower classes. In addition, the super-rich have a great impact on technological innovation..." In other words, people copy the behaviour of those with high status.
2/n
@keithalexander @LeeEnviron @tomhillonline @KevinClimate @ClimateBeard @MichaelEMann @penn_state @USATODAY Here's the killer: "Our results suggest that a typical super-rich household of two people produces a carbon footprint of 129.3 tCO2e per year... and 66.5 tCO2e per year generated by... air travel." Maybe these are the people resisting a focus on individual behaviour.
3/n
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @steviedubyu has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @steviedubyu!

Read all threads by @steviedubyu

:(