All the writers who keep repeating as fact that the line in my #1619Project essay about slavery and the American Revolution is an error, are going to be really, really surprised when they see all the evidence and citations backing it up in the book when it published Nov. 16.
I've repeatedly listed the evidence, and the historians and historical texts backing up this assertion. The NYT issued a response of its own. I've posted essays and Twitter threads by other historians backing this assertion. Folks remain impervious to this, and that says a lot.
*when the book publishES Nov. 16.
Trust & believe: I did not just sit down one day & decide to make up something about slavery as one of the motivations for Americans to join the revolution & then print it in the New York Times. One can say there are disagreements, but one cannot study this and call it an error.
I will say that reading so many books on the American Revolution, challenging the mythology that I'd learned, digging into the complexities, the divergent identities, politics, and motivations of the 13 colonies has been so fun and interesting. This part of my job I just love.
This nation has been much, much more protective of its mythology around our founding than even of the Civil War. The Lost Cause has nothing on the whitewashing of the narrative of our founding and our founders, and people across the political spectrum fight hard to protect it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ida Bae Wells

Ida Bae Wells Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nhannahjones

15 Jun
"1000s of educators & others gathered at historic locations in more than 20 cities to make clear that they would resist efforts in at least 15 Republican-led states to restrict what teachers can say in class about racism, sexism and oppression in America." washingtonpost.com/education/2021…
"In Iowa, where Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds this week signed legislation banning the teaching of “specific defined concepts,” including critical race theory, teachers say the law is already a chilling effect."
“I will say it’s already playing out,” sixth-grade teacher Monique Cottman said in an interview with Jesse Hagopian, a Seattle high school teacher and co-founder of Black Lives Matter at School."
Read 6 tweets
15 Jun
Powerful U.S. senators, in seeking to defend American freedom and values, are again trying to prohibit the teaching of the #1619Project, a work of American journalism protected by the First Amendment. cotton.senate.gov/news/press-rel…
@SenTomCotton: “Activists in schools want to teach our kids to hate America." My essay: I wish that I could go back to the younger me & tell her that her people’s ancestry started here, on these lands, and to boldly, proudly, draw the stars and those stripes of the American flag.
Only if one believes that the Black Americans fighting to force this country to live up to its founding ideals, who died expanding democracy and rights for all, are not real Americans, can one treat the #1619Project as teaching anyone to hate America.
Read 7 tweets
9 Jun
It's a failure of journalism if stories on the critical race theory "controversy" do not include the factual and contextual reporting that this is a well-planned Republican misinformation strategy and that nearly nothing being labeled critical race theory actually is CRT.
Like, basic reporting would demand that we make Republicans define critical race theory, and then we fact check that against what CRT actually is and whether CRT is actually being taught where and how Republicans claim.
Almost none of this reporting actually defines critical race theory, a clear indication that the reporters reporting on it do not actually really know what it is, nor does it question why everyone is "suddenly" talking about a legal theory that has been around for decades.
Read 7 tweets
8 Jun
As @GovAbbott proudly signed the 1836 Project into law, & states across the U.S. are banning teaching that centers slavery and truthfully recounts our nation's racist past, history is again instructive: This's part of a legacy of the government banning the discussion of slavery.
One of the historical facts that you likely won't learn in the 1836 Project, 1776 Project or any other 1619 Project copycats is that in 1836, Congress adopted a "gag" rule against any conversation abt the abolition of slavery being considered. history.house.gov/Historical-Hig…“gag-rule”/
The following year, abolitionists sent > 130,000 petitions to Congress demanding the abolition of slavery in OUR NATION'S CAPITAL. Ths gag rule prevented any of them from being heard. Even then, conservatives were pushing to prohibit speech that forced confrontation with slavery.
Read 6 tweets
7 Jun
Article VIII, SEC. 1. 1845 TX Constitution: The legislature shall have no power to pass laws for the emancipation of slaves without the consent of their owners, nor without paying their owners.
"In 1829, When Vicente Guerrero, then president of the Republic of Mexico, issued a decree that all enslaved people were henceforth emancipated, Anglo settlers were aghast. 'We are ruined forever should this measure be adopted.'" texasmonthly.com/being-texan/ho…
“Ninety-five percent of the entire Republic of Texas economy was cotton, so what they’re building is a cotton nation,” Torget says. To do that, they “believed they needed slavery to be legal and protected, because that’s what makes it profitable.”
Read 4 tweets
3 Jun
"There may be some nuance to what she was saying there but I thought, ‘Holy Cow.’ I know there are people who advocate Black separatism, you know, in America. I don’t know if she’s one of them but I said, ‘Here are her words. What do they mean?'”
pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2021/06/03/unc…
"But the text of Hannah-Jones’s piece does not appear to argue for building largely black schools, exclusive Black communities or any sort of racial separatism. In fact, the piece argues any form of reparations should include enforcement of existing civil rights laws."
"Much of Hannah-Jones’s most celebrated journalism — including work that won her a MacArthur “Genius” grant, the George Polk and George Foster Peabody awards and multiple National Magazine Awards — is about the necessity of school integration, not separatism."
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(