Last week, I presented orally at a hearing of the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Comission on China's efforts in the clean energy transition, focusing on industrial electrification.
Testimony and recording in link. This is a summary thread. 🧵
China has already achieved dominance of the current "big three" pillars of cleantech: solar PV, batteries, and EVs.
To these, add wind turbines and ultra high-voltage transmission, and China's 2030 carbon emissions peaking target seems quite assured.
But what then?
Yes, the emissions peak is mathematically inevitable, with both coal consumption and petroleum consumption having already peaked, or about to peak, depending on to whom you speak. But what must happen post-2030 to ensure the peak turns into a decline, and not just a plateau?
Broadly speaking, the USA's China strategy as informed by guys who did a stint in the country 15-20 years ago has been so ineffective and incoherent that it's quite likely you could get sharper China policy and advisory from people who have never been here at all.
IMO, being an expat in China 15 yrs ago grants NEGATIVE effectiveness as a source of insight for policymaking/advisory in 2025.
Similar to HK or TW expats, their knowledge is worse than ignorance. They actively misinform, usually to the detriment of their OWN objectives.
It's not impossible to do better, and policymakers must do so to survive. Where do you imagine the fantasy that China would fold under tariff pressure because of its export reliance came from?
China Taxicab Chronicles: Mrs. Mi Will Buy a House in Kashgar
I'm heading to a meeting in Pudong. Mrs. Mi picks me up in a new GAC Aion Y and confirms my phone number.
Her accent sounds like me in Chinese class 15 years ago. Mandarin is clearly not her first language. 🧵
"You...you're not Chinese, right?" she asks.
"No, I'm American. Do I look Chinese?"
"You look Arabic, or from Afghanistan. But you sound Chinese"
"I've been here a long time"
"How long?"
"13 years"
"Oh, longer than me"
"How long have you been in Shanghai?"
"Over one year"
"Ah, welcome to Shanghai. I can hear your accent...you're from Xinjiang right? What part?"
"Yes. I'm from Kashgar"
"Oh, Southern Xinjiang. I have friends from Korla and Yili, but I don't know anyone from that far south."
"Yes, that's Northern Xinjiang. Different from us."
While everyone was busy freaking out about the Trump tariffs, China released a new list of its major low-carbon demo projects for 2025
This is Batch 2 - the first batch was announced last year.
All of them are important and ground-breaking projects...101 of them in total.🧵
Remember, the title of National Demonstration Project is a powerful designation with many practical benefits to project owners, including direct financial and fiscal support, policy and approval advantages, increased access to technology and talent resources, prioritization in government procurement events, and long-term institutional backing from local authorities (for example, being written into the province's five-year plan).
This list of projects is basically a direct summary of what national energy stakeholders think are the most important cutting-edge items in furthering the national low-carbon energy agenda, and a promise to support those projects to achieve success.
I won't go through the entire list one-by-one...that would be way too long, but I did review the list so I could provide some high-level summary of the types of projects on the list, and pick out some that I thought were particularly notable.
This is a longish and text-heavy thread, so it definitely won't be for everyone. But if you want to get an early view on what's happening on the cutting edge of China's energy transition tech, and not be shocked when they make some big announcement in a year or two, then this is the thread for you.
I'll provide link at the end of the thread for both Batch 1 and 2, of course, so you can review on your own. Okay, let's go.
When they teach about the rise of China in textbooks someday, I hope there's at least a section about how USA institutions psy-opped themselves into utter helplessness by meticulously sourcing all their primary insights from copium vendors. This could be a thesis.
No need to actually write the thesis yourself though; DeepSeek's got it covered.
"Institutionalized Copium Networks" I'm gonna borrow that one for the future.
This is the kind of stuff I'm talking about. These are exactly the narratives that people, want, need to believe are meaningful, so they can make themselves believe Everything is Fine.
Freedom and lack of corruption is the USA's secret sauce? Oh buddy...
I found the thesis of this article peculiar and the intention flawed.
The authors are so alarmed over the potential for China's policies on climate being mislabeled as virtuous that they felt the need to pen an article to refute this view...why? 🧵
It’s not even a stretch or oversimplification to characterize the thesis as: “China not good; actually, China bad”.
This makes for tedious reading, as it is an article focused exclusively on the litigation of China’s morality re: climate issues.
There is no attempt to rationalize or contextualize...no effort to examine the nature of, or motivation behind the “sins”, or a consideration what precedent is set by treating fossil-fuel driven energy expansion as such an explicitly moral issue.
I have discussed the main arguments and counter-arguments on China's carbon emissions at length previously, most recently in this article from January. I don't want to re-up has the entire thing (go read it on LI or Substack) but to summarize briefly...