517k doses reported, down due to second doses falling (they've dropped back below 1st dose volumes in the last couple of days).
1st doses of 280k are only up 7%, but the 7D total is pushing up towards 1.5m a week which is good to see.
1/
An update on 1st doses at younger ages, shows most of the UK is now heading towards 75% in the 30-39 group.
Under 30 W is very close to 70% whereas the other nations still have some way to go to reach that level.
So W has nearly completed 1st doses for all who want it.
2/
Over recent days there's been little progress in W and E in the 30-39 group suggesting we're reaching the level of take-up we're going to see.
S in contrast looks to still be pushing ahead, and NI is lagging somewhat.
3/
Under 30 W is also slowing down, but looks as though it will just hit 70% before 1st doses are complete.
Others are advancing much faster as you would expect, being further behind.
4/
Back to 2nd doses, 236k is down a third on last week, which is to be expected as we mirror a very slow period of 1st doses in mid-April. Allowing for an element of reduced take-up we're now fairly close to an 8 week average delay.
5/5
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A great thread on the state pension and National Insurance.
For me, the trailed abolition of NI and thus its replacement by general taxation in terms of funding state pension benefits will have a major generational redistribution of tax.
It’s been the case that (in aggregate) at any one time the working generation funds the SPs of the retired generation above it.
2/
If the abolition of NI results in an increase (albeit smaller - else why bother) in income tax, whilst those in work will in total be better off, pensioners will be worse off.
3/
The Pensions & Lifetime Savings Association has updated its guide to living costs in retirement. The full report is well worth a read, and goes into a lot of detail.
One key point is that it assumes that pensioners own their home outright - probably reasonable now, but the shift to renting means that in future years that may become increasingly questionable.
2/
It focuses on retirement income, but note that other sources may be used to fund retirement, whether it be income from savings/investments, or gradual withdrawal of capital. Much more likely to be relevant for those aspiring to a comfortable lifestyle of course.
3/
UKHSA estimates that prevalence of COVID in England and Scotland has nearly tripled in the month since the ONS restarted its COVID infection surveillance.
Fortunately prevalence is lowest at the oldest, more vulnerable age groups, but is estimated at just under 6% in the 18 to 44 age groups.
2/
Prevalence is estimated to be highest in the London area, at just over 6% across the population. Note though that confidence intervals are wider due to lower sample sizes than in previous studies.
So with the news this morning that the earnings growth announced today means the state pension (SP) will very likely increase by another 8.5% next year, it's time to set out once again why the SP triple lock (TL) is such a bad idea.
1/
It's all down to cherry-picking the best of the three rates each year. I did a thread nearly a year ago, that hopefully sets out clearly how the mechanism inevitably means that the SP will grow over time against both earnings (E) and prices (P).
With BH's still distorting individual weeks' figures, the cumulative position gives a better view, with the latest CMI age-standardised analysis showing mortality 3.8% (of a full year's mortality) worse than its reference year of 2019.
Here's the mea culpa - it was only wrong by a factor of 13, but at least the post has been deleted rather than just corrected and left up, when experience shows that only a fraction of the original audience will see the correction.
So what are the true numbers?
2/
In E&W the peak week in 2020 was just under 9,000, and the second wave peak was pretty close to that number.
In total ONS has recorded 199,728 COVID related deaths in E&W since the pandemic started.