Dr. Deepti Gurdasani Profile picture
Jun 20, 2021 24 tweets 6 min read Read on X
More & more evidence accruing that SARS-CoV-2 causes significant persistent effects on the brain. We now have multiple strands supporting this-
-long-term symptoms-brain fog, memory loss
-higher risk of stroke/neuro diseases
-structural brain changes
-virus persistence in brain🧵
We know that SARS-CoV-2 is neuro-invasive. This means that it enters the brain- we think this is through the olfactory nerve (the nerve that helps us smell) through the nose. This has been shown in mice, hamsters and directly in humans in autopsies.

nature.com/articles/s4159…
Image
Replicating SARS-CoV-2 has also been shown to persist in neuro-epithelium (olfactory nerves in the nose) for up to 6 months among people who have recurrent or persistent loss of smell.

stm.sciencemag.org/content/13/596…
Neurological symptoms are significant among people post-COVID, & they persist for long periods of time, even after other symptoms recover. ONS data shows that problems with concentration, memory, brain fog, loss of smell/taste are common persistent symptoms after infection Image
Symptom based surveys have consistently shown that neurological symptoms are more likely to arise later, and persist over time, and symptom clusters that have neurological symptoms generally also correlate with poorer day to day functioning. Image
A @TheLancetPsych study showed that neurological & psychiatric diagnosis were very common at 6 months after COVID-19, and the risk for psychiatric disorders, strokes, dementia, muscle disorders was significantly higher, even in those not hospitalised.
There have been earlier studies that have looked at cognitive decline following hospitalisation with COVID-19 suggesting significant reduction after hospitalisation. These studies have been limited by not having measurements pre-COVID-19 to establish that this was the cause.
This is addressed now in a study within UK biobank. This is a cohort of generally healthy people who have had many measurements done as part of the study. ~40,000 people have had brain imaging done for research purposes before the COVID-19 pandemic.
Of the people who have had their second MRI brain scan in the Biobank study, some of them developed COVID-19 before the second scan. We can compare brain changes between those infected vs not infected by comparing the change in brain structure between the two scans.
394 people who were COVID-19 positive (only 15 of these were hospitalised) were imaged after COVID-19 was diagnosed. These were compared with 388 controls (not diagnosed with COVID-19). Both groups had MRI scans done before the pandemic at baseline.
They were compared for volume and thickness in certain areas of the brain. Cases & controls were matched for age, sex, ethnicity & the time between the baseline and repeat MRI scan to ensure any difference in change in brain structure between the two groups was not down to these.
The groups were well matched. Age was between 47-80 (mean age ~59). Similar blood pressure, prevalence of diabetes and BMI. As mentioned, most of the COVID group was people who were infected & tested in the community with non-severe COVID-19. Image
Most of the patients had been diagnosed Oct 2020 or after, and the duration between infection and scan varied accordingly. Mean duration was 4.5 months post COVID-19 Image
The study found significant reduction in grey matter in certain parts of the brain- especially those associated with smell, and memory. Of note- these are changes in a population of people who mostly had mild COVID symptoms - *greater* reduction from baseline in those with COVID
Image
Image
While correlation isn't causation, the fact that these people were imaged at baseline before COVID-19 - allowing to compare to a group not infected with COVID-19 to look at difference in decline in grey matter after COVID compared to those who weren't infected makes it strong.
Remember, these groups were also the same age, had the same interval between scans, and many similar characteristics, making it unlikely this decline is down to something other than COVID-19
This is very concerning- we are seeing evidence of significant changes in the brain even among people with relatively mild COVID-19. This study was in 46-80 yr olds, and many would've been healthy. We urgently need to understand the impact of COVID-19 in younger age groups too.
This isn't just one study that suggests a link between SARS-CoV-2 and neurodegenerative disease. There have been several care reports of early-onset parkinsonism after SARS-CoV-2 infection, highlighting possible links with neuro-degenerative disease.

thelancet.com/journals/laneu…
Does this happen with other viruses?
Yes, many viruses invade and affect the brain: herpes viruses, Zika virus, measles, polio and of course, Spanish flu (encephalitis lethargica as immortalised in Awakenings). Other coronaviruses are known to invade the brain too.
This has been concerning for a while, but recent reports show us ignoring this will come at a huge cost. We need to stop focusing on hospitalisations & deaths as the only outcome, thinking that it's ok for transmission to continue at such levels. It's not.
This is the sort of thinking that will possibly leave thousands with chronic debilitating neurological illness, as well as other impacts of long COVID. By the time our scientific community & govt are satisfied that there is irrevocable evidence, it'll be much too late.
While I'm not a neuroscientist, I've worked with @HZiauddeen , who is, to make sure my interpretation of the UK biobank study is correct. I've seen several non-experts comment on possible limitations of the study, so wanted to ensure that I'd sought an expert perspective.
Conclusion: This is a robust study that shows significant change in brain structure, and thinning of grey matter in memory, smell and taste associated brain regions post-COVID-19. We should be concerned. This is not a virus we should be happy to expose anyone to.
Link to UK Biobank study here:
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Deepti Gurdasani

Dr. Deepti Gurdasani Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dgurdasani1

Apr 17
Just read this beautiful author's note after finishing Bloodmarked by @tracydeonn
This encapsulates my discomfort with how we tend to glorify surviving trauma as 'strength' & those who suffer as 'resilient', when they have no choice & cannot escape the violence aimed at them. Image
This is not to diminish in any way the lived experiences of survivors of trauma, but rather to re-iterate that being human and vulnerable means being able to fall apart, and not having to be 'strong' in the face of the cumulative grief & trauma of just living in the world we do.
People deserve not to have to live like this, rather than having their pain and suffering being glorified as 'strength' & 'resilience'. Rather than celebrating the impact of trauma, we should be seeking to build a society that doesn't require people to survive this amount of pain
Read 12 tweets
Apr 5
The success of movements and their reach often depends on solidarity between these leading to advocacy on multiple related fronts. Health equality, disability advocacy, decolonialism, anti-racism, feminism, trans rights, climate justice, health & social equality, are connected🧵
Not all movement leaders see these connections. From my experience, it's often the least privileged groups, and/or groups with an understanding of systemic power structures (often because they are subject to systemic violence themselves) who understand these connections better.
I often see solidarity missing from movements like the COVID cautious movement, and even some advocating for long COVID. Often people with ME/CFS or other chronic illness, or disability are excluded, despite similarities and the v. long history of systemic violence against them.
Read 15 tweets
Apr 2
This epidemiological history suggests there may be cow-to-cow transmission of H5N1 taking place (cows affected without clear exposure to poultry/birds), which is quite concerning. To date, mammal-to-mammal transmission has only been identified in experimental conditions. 🧵
H5N1 has been showing adaptation to mammals (PB2-E627K and PB2-D701N mutations)- which may explain the extensive transmission to mammals (sea lions, cats, foxes, and now cows) and high mortality among mammals affected over the past year.
There is spillover to humans that has also happened in some cases, but to date there is no clear instance of human-to-human transmission that has been identified (almost all cases have had contact with birds/poultry).
Read 13 tweets
Mar 31
A huge point missing from the 'cumulative risk' discussion is that it's not just about the cumulative risk of developing long-COVID population-wide, but also what happens to the quality of life of those who have long COVID with subsequent infections. Or does no one care?
The limited research we have so far shows that this group is at high risk of worsening with each infection- significantly affecting their quality of life. Something not measured in cumulative risk studies- because those studies only measure new LC among those who don't have it
Given the high levels of prevalent long COVID in every single country (as shown by the ONS survey, the household pulse survey and others), shouldn't we also care about what repeated infection are doing to this very large population?
Read 10 tweets
Mar 30
Given that 'cumulative probability' has now become additive- I guess the chance of getting a head from three coin tosses is 50% +50% +50% =150%?
(yes this is a subtweet, and no those calculations make no sense at all to anyone who has any basic understanding of probability!)
The *real* cumulative probability for getting LC is as follows: 1-(the probability of not getting LC)=
(1- [(1-x)(1-y)(1-z)]....), where x, y, z... are the probabilities of getting LC at 1st, 2nd, 3rd infection and so on. The probability increases with each infection.
Always amazed by how people can be so consistently and confidently wrong when they clearly don't even have basic mathematical knowledge to be able to grasp the most foundational concepts.
Read 8 tweets
Mar 24
A brief 🧵on recent experience with possible MCAS (Mast Cell Activating Syndrome) as part of long COVID. Hoping this thread may help others who have symptoms of MCAS post-COVID who may not have been diagnosed, or have considered this possibility & may be untreated as a result
Some background- I have had hypermobility, GERD, auto-immune disease (UC) & mild POTS before COVID. After COVID, the POTS, GERD worsened & I developed fatigue, brain fog & PEM. To those who know about MCAS, none of this will be surprising, as all these are associated with MCAS.
I recently had a wk long episode of gastro-enteritis, and was very puzzled as to what was going on. I hadn't eaten out & no one else at home was ill. I am on treatments that could cause this as a side effect, but I'd never had these effects with the doses I was using before.
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(