More & more evidence accruing that SARS-CoV-2 causes significant persistent effects on the brain. We now have multiple strands supporting this-
-long-term symptoms-brain fog, memory loss
-higher risk of stroke/neuro diseases
-structural brain changes
-virus persistence in brain🧵
We know that SARS-CoV-2 is neuro-invasive. This means that it enters the brain- we think this is through the olfactory nerve (the nerve that helps us smell) through the nose. This has been shown in mice, hamsters and directly in humans in autopsies.
Replicating SARS-CoV-2 has also been shown to persist in neuro-epithelium (olfactory nerves in the nose) for up to 6 months among people who have recurrent or persistent loss of smell.
Neurological symptoms are significant among people post-COVID, & they persist for long periods of time, even after other symptoms recover. ONS data shows that problems with concentration, memory, brain fog, loss of smell/taste are common persistent symptoms after infection
Symptom based surveys have consistently shown that neurological symptoms are more likely to arise later, and persist over time, and symptom clusters that have neurological symptoms generally also correlate with poorer day to day functioning.
A @TheLancetPsych study showed that neurological & psychiatric diagnosis were very common at 6 months after COVID-19, and the risk for psychiatric disorders, strokes, dementia, muscle disorders was significantly higher, even in those not hospitalised.
There have been earlier studies that have looked at cognitive decline following hospitalisation with COVID-19 suggesting significant reduction after hospitalisation. These studies have been limited by not having measurements pre-COVID-19 to establish that this was the cause.
This is addressed now in a study within UK biobank. This is a cohort of generally healthy people who have had many measurements done as part of the study. ~40,000 people have had brain imaging done for research purposes before the COVID-19 pandemic.
Of the people who have had their second MRI brain scan in the Biobank study, some of them developed COVID-19 before the second scan. We can compare brain changes between those infected vs not infected by comparing the change in brain structure between the two scans.
394 people who were COVID-19 positive (only 15 of these were hospitalised) were imaged after COVID-19 was diagnosed. These were compared with 388 controls (not diagnosed with COVID-19). Both groups had MRI scans done before the pandemic at baseline.
They were compared for volume and thickness in certain areas of the brain. Cases & controls were matched for age, sex, ethnicity & the time between the baseline and repeat MRI scan to ensure any difference in change in brain structure between the two groups was not down to these.
The groups were well matched. Age was between 47-80 (mean age ~59). Similar blood pressure, prevalence of diabetes and BMI. As mentioned, most of the COVID group was people who were infected & tested in the community with non-severe COVID-19.
Most of the patients had been diagnosed Oct 2020 or after, and the duration between infection and scan varied accordingly. Mean duration was 4.5 months post COVID-19
The study found significant reduction in grey matter in certain parts of the brain- especially those associated with smell, and memory. Of note- these are changes in a population of people who mostly had mild COVID symptoms - *greater* reduction from baseline in those with COVID
While correlation isn't causation, the fact that these people were imaged at baseline before COVID-19 - allowing to compare to a group not infected with COVID-19 to look at difference in decline in grey matter after COVID compared to those who weren't infected makes it strong.
Remember, these groups were also the same age, had the same interval between scans, and many similar characteristics, making it unlikely this decline is down to something other than COVID-19
This is very concerning- we are seeing evidence of significant changes in the brain even among people with relatively mild COVID-19. This study was in 46-80 yr olds, and many would've been healthy. We urgently need to understand the impact of COVID-19 in younger age groups too.
This isn't just one study that suggests a link between SARS-CoV-2 and neurodegenerative disease. There have been several care reports of early-onset parkinsonism after SARS-CoV-2 infection, highlighting possible links with neuro-degenerative disease.
Does this happen with other viruses?
Yes, many viruses invade and affect the brain: herpes viruses, Zika virus, measles, polio and of course, Spanish flu (encephalitis lethargica as immortalised in Awakenings). Other coronaviruses are known to invade the brain too.
This has been concerning for a while, but recent reports show us ignoring this will come at a huge cost. We need to stop focusing on hospitalisations & deaths as the only outcome, thinking that it's ok for transmission to continue at such levels. It's not.
This is the sort of thinking that will possibly leave thousands with chronic debilitating neurological illness, as well as other impacts of long COVID. By the time our scientific community & govt are satisfied that there is irrevocable evidence, it'll be much too late.
While I'm not a neuroscientist, I've worked with @HZiauddeen , who is, to make sure my interpretation of the UK biobank study is correct. I've seen several non-experts comment on possible limitations of the study, so wanted to ensure that I'd sought an expert perspective.
Conclusion: This is a robust study that shows significant change in brain structure, and thinning of grey matter in memory, smell and taste associated brain regions post-COVID-19. We should be concerned. This is not a virus we should be happy to expose anyone to.
The idea that people are chronically ill or disabled because they don't want to get better or aren't trying to get better is borne out of nothing but abelism. It's easier to think it's the patient's fault rather than acknowledge you don't know how to help patients. 🧵
There isn't a shred of evidence to support this view, yet it gets constantly doled out by medics to patients who are struggling & would do anything to get better. The impact is further gaslighting a patient population that has been offered very little for decades.
The lack of curiosity about patients' illness means that no one delves further to try and understand it, because it's so much easier to just throw up your hands, and blame them for being ill. As if anyone would want to live with debilitating chronic illness if they had a choice.
Rather concerning that only 5% of dairy farmworkers *exposed to ill cows after H5N1 detection* wore CDC recommended PPE. H5N1 (avian influenza) is highly pathogenic, and this is really worrying, given the large numbers of spillover events that have been observed in humans lately
H5N1 has been adapting to mammals, with the recent circulating strain in dairy adapted specifically to binding to cells in the human respiratory tract. Mammal to mammal transmission has been suspected in specific outbreaks (e.g. mink in Spain), but not shown clearly in others.
Thankfully, efficient human to human transmission hasn't been observed yet, but if it's given a chance to spread across mammals in farms, with multiple spill overs into humans, it's only a matter of time.
The hubris of blaming those whose families & communities have been slaughtered by your leaders for not voting for those same leaders - because now *you* feel unsafe - while sitting in your intact homes that are not being razed to the ground, with your children alive and safe.
Implicit in this cry of American liberals is the devaluation of brown and Muslim lives. If it were their relatives murdered by their government, against their screams and protests, it's unlikely they would've voted for them. But white lives and safety always matter more.
A genocide becomes 'a single issue'. If it were a genocide of white Americans, I can guarantee it wouldn't be a 'single issue'. You can just see this by all the tweets about how Americans now feel unsafe.
If you've lived this long and have not had to realise that - *everything*- where you live, what you read, the streets you walk, what you eat, what you feel, where you work, the climate you live in, and even the air you breathe is political, I have news for you: that's privilege.
I automatically find myself looking at how people parse the world, and whether they fit into the former or the latter.
People who understand the systemically unjust & violent nature of the world, and how literally everything is shaped by capitalism, imperialism, colonialism are the people who understand the need for change, and the radical means necessary to enact this.
COVID has disproportionately affected disabled, clinically vulnerable, deprived & black/brown/indigenous communities. To say that that airborne precautions worsen inequity is BS. Rather, these protect *everyone*. If you care about equity, set air Q standards, provide respirators.
The WHO has done so much harm in this regard, & still continues to, because they simply cannot seem to acknowledge that they were wrong, and that very likely caused harm - which led to loss of life, and to chronic illness in many. We need accountability & learning here. Not lies.
If @WHO wants to restore any trust, they must acknowledge mistakes that have caused untold harm, and seek to show learning and change. None of this is happening when they say BS like this, and parade people like Farrar with more lies and BS to try to justify the unjustifiable.
I remember all those who told us that RAT sensitivity was near 100% to detect 'infectiousness' - this study reports 47% compared with RT-PCR and 80% compared with viral culture. The lowest sensitivity is for those who are asymptomatic, and also during the pre-symptomatic phase.🧵
Sensitivity of RATs tends to rise when symptoms begin, but there is infectiousness before this that may not be picked up. Apart from the obvious impacts on transmission, this also has v. important impacts on treatment for people who are clinically vulnerable.
For many people who are clinically vulnerable, the primary consideration is getting treatment to them on time. Given the low sensitivity of RATs against PCR, especially in the early periods of infection, treatment may be significantly delayed by reliance on RATs over PCR.