The ‘new’ Office for Science & Technology Strategy looks remarkably like the old OST, restored to its former base in the Cabinet Office: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of…
As well as a souped-up job title for @uksciencechief, this configuration presumably brings with it the current Govt Office for Science (from BEIS)—though the No.10 release is opaque on this point… gov.uk/government/new…
So the 50-year yo-yo between S&T policy in Cabinet Office and DTI/BEIS swings once more to the centre. This will please all those who believe in command-&-control science, but as @BBCPallab perceptively notes here, be careful what you wish for! bbc.co.uk/news/science-e… @jon_agar
Perhaps more interesting is the creation of the Ministerial Council, which strongly resembles one of the central (but until now, unfulfilled) recommendations of the 2015 Nurse Review gov.uk/government/col…
Will this be just another ministerial committee, of which there are many, or will it play a more proactive role in determining R&D policy & investment? Might suggest more of the promised uplift to £22bn/yr will be retained for Whitehall R&D priorities, with less for @UKRI_News?
Worth noting that these changes also align with arguments made at various points by @Dominic2306, who here & via ARIA continues to exert a big influence on S&T policy, despite his falling out with No.10 on other fronts.
A final, more cynical, point. Juggling structures for scientific advice right now further blurs lines of accountability for what went wrong (& well) in UK’s response to Covid-19. instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publications/s… @tom_sasse @instituteforgov
Moving & rebranding of Go-Science, which is responsible for SAGE (rather like the axing of PHE) means that when any public inquiry finally completes its work, few of the key bodies (& people) will still be in place to face the music. A perfect Whitehall solution…
NB @martinrsmith has helpfully pointed to this 8 June letter from @uksciencechief to @GregClarkMP which gives more insight into envisaged role for the new Office for S&T Strategy, inc as a “key customer” for Govt Office for Science. committees.parliament.uk/publications/6…
So on this account, Go-Sci continues as before, with OSTS now working alongside at the centre—both headed by the same person. It’s all clear as mud..!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Wilsdon

James Wilsdon Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jameswilsdon

1 Jul 20
UK’s ‘R&D roadmap’ is published today by @beisgovuk. It reaffirms govt’s pledge to double public R&D investment to £22bn a year by 2025, and initiates a consultation on how this should be allocated gov.uk/government/new… (1/9)
Initial headlines: 300m fast-tracked for scientific infrastructure; new ‘Office for Talent’ based in No.10 to attract ‘top global science, research & innovation talent’; extension for PhD graduates’ right to live & work in UK to 3 years; & new Innovation Expert Group. (2/9)
But the real action is yet to come, as Roadmap triggers a ‘big conversation on what actions need to be taken & how’. Includes 8 ‘high level questions’ which will lead to a ‘comprehensive R&D plan’ as part of autumn Spending Review. (3/9)
Read 12 tweets
25 Apr 20
No.10’s response to the Guardian’s SAGE scoop - trying to downplay political advisers’ participation as routine - fails to address the fundamental point, as raised by @Sir_David_King, that this is far from normal. And he should know, as a former @uksciencechief.
It also contravenes the second of the government’s own principles of scientific advice to government - “scientific advisers should be free from political interference with their work” gov.uk/government/pub…
As regards Cummings in particular, there are echoes here of his other interventions in science policy. Talking to several scientists who attended No.10 meetings on S&I funding back in the summer/autumn, one striking aspect was the extent to which those present, who included
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(