The ‘new’ Office for Science & Technology Strategy looks remarkably like the old OST, restored to its former base in the Cabinet Office: en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Office_of…
As well as a souped-up job title for @uksciencechief, this configuration presumably brings with it the current Govt Office for Science (from BEIS)—though the No.10 release is opaque on this point… gov.uk/government/new…
So the 50-year yo-yo between S&T policy in Cabinet Office and DTI/BEIS swings once more to the centre. This will please all those who believe in command-&-control science, but as @BBCPallab perceptively notes here, be careful what you wish for! bbc.co.uk/news/science-e…@jon_agar
Perhaps more interesting is the creation of the Ministerial Council, which strongly resembles one of the central (but until now, unfulfilled) recommendations of the 2015 Nurse Review gov.uk/government/col…
Will this be just another ministerial committee, of which there are many, or will it play a more proactive role in determining R&D policy & investment? Might suggest more of the promised uplift to £22bn/yr will be retained for Whitehall R&D priorities, with less for @UKRI_News?
Worth noting that these changes also align with arguments made at various points by @Dominic2306, who here & via ARIA continues to exert a big influence on S&T policy, despite his falling out with No.10 on other fronts.
Moving & rebranding of Go-Science, which is responsible for SAGE (rather like the axing of PHE) means that when any public inquiry finally completes its work, few of the key bodies (& people) will still be in place to face the music. A perfect Whitehall solution…
UK’s ‘R&D roadmap’ is published today by @beisgovuk. It reaffirms govt’s pledge to double public R&D investment to £22bn a year by 2025, and initiates a consultation on how this should be allocated gov.uk/government/new… (1/9)
Initial headlines: 300m fast-tracked for scientific infrastructure; new ‘Office for Talent’ based in No.10 to attract ‘top global science, research & innovation talent’; extension for PhD graduates’ right to live & work in UK to 3 years; & new Innovation Expert Group. (2/9)
But the real action is yet to come, as Roadmap triggers a ‘big conversation on what actions need to be taken & how’. Includes 8 ‘high level questions’ which will lead to a ‘comprehensive R&D plan’ as part of autumn Spending Review. (3/9)
No.10’s response to the Guardian’s SAGE scoop - trying to downplay political advisers’ participation as routine - fails to address the fundamental point, as raised by @Sir_David_King, that this is far from normal. And he should know, as a former @uksciencechief.
It also contravenes the second of the government’s own principles of scientific advice to government - “scientific advisers should be free from political interference with their work” gov.uk/government/pub…
As regards Cummings in particular, there are echoes here of his other interventions in science policy. Talking to several scientists who attended No.10 meetings on S&I funding back in the summer/autumn, one striking aspect was the extent to which those present, who included