@ryangrim There are multiple toxicology related issues plus issues with the various claims about events at Location 2 and the hospital which remain *highly* problematic. I'll spell them out for you.
1) the NATO toxicologists consulted in June agreed with the Douma team that the immediate onset of pulmonary oedema symptom of frothing was not consistent with chlorine. wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…
2) These victims would not have died on the spot, gathering in piles, and then produce foaming at the mouth. This finding was clearly spelled out in the original report but expunged, with no explanation, in the final report. wikileaks.org/opcw-douma/doc…
3) A further issue identified in the original report but expunged from the final report concerned how unlikely it appeared for there to have been any build up of gas sufficient to kill the victims almost instantaneously.
4) The original report discussed how it was considered highly unlikely that concentrations could have built up either in the building, where windows on each floor were all shattered, or in the basement
5) In fact, as set out in the original interim report, many witnesses claimed that large numbers of people died in the basement, even though no plausible explanation could be found as to how concentrations would have built up there.
6) It is also notable that some so-called 'Country X witnesses' reported some symptoms only associated with a nerve agent when, in fact no traces of nerve agents were ever found. @CL4Syr@MichaKobs
7) Other important findings, highlighted in the original interim report but left unresolved or obfuscated in the final report, concern the authenticity of some of the observed foam and the 're-positioning' bodies throughout the night of 7/8 April.
10) These hospital scenes are generally reported as occurring circa 7pm. The alleged attack times are vary between 7 pm and some are as late as 8.30. Unless we believe those staging the hospital scenes anticipated an incoming chemical attack, questions are then raised about Loc2.
11) Here it is also worth while noting that a man at location 2 is also identified at the hospital scenes, taking photographs at both:-
12) Given these substantial issues, plus the ballistics noted elsewhere in this thread, and there are many more document here berlingroup21.org/background, it is an eminently reasonable request that the @opcw now allow *all* the douma inspectors to meet and review the investigation.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The @opcw's Syria operation is corrupted by Western powers, especially the UK government. The Douma scandal confirmed how this corruption occurred. thegrayzone.com/2026/05/24/opc… @caitoz @TuckerCarlson @rogerwaters @wallacemick @ClareDalyIRL @TulsiGabbard @ClarkeMicah @aaronjmate x.com/OPCW/status/20…
a) BG21's review provides a comprehensive account of the manipulation of the Douma investigation and has never been refuted. berlingroup21.org/front-matter-a…
b) Douma was not an isolated incident and other CW investigations can also be shown to have been manipulated. This 5-part series provides an overview; detailed reports are to come: ukcolumn.org/article/the-wh…
The ongoing problem for the @opcw is that it cannot erase the fact that it helped cover up the murder of 43 civilians in Douma during the investigation of an alleged chlorine gas attack in 2018.
1) When its own scientists sought to challenge the corrupted investigation, they were sidelined and then smeared. Inspector Brendan Whelan recently won his ILOAT case against the @opcw. thegrayzone.com/2026/05/24/opc…
2) During the course of the ILOAT legal battle, the @opcw inadvertently confirmed that they had censored a report from top NATO chemical weapons experts (toxicologists) which had concluded these civilians could not have been killed by chlorine gas:
Western intelligence assets in the @opcw worked hard to bury the toxicological evidence that these civilians were not killed by the alleged chlorine gas attack in Douma 2018. First they buried the toxicology report: ukcolumn.org/article/the-ce…x.com/TheGrayzoneNew…
And then, come the IIT report, constructed fraudulent claims about 1) the location of the dead, falsely suggesting they were all trapped upstairs: berlingroup21.org/front-matter-a…
and 2) manipulating two scientific references in order to suggest that this foaming at the mouth is compatible with asphyxiation from high concentrations of chlorine gas
An important read that helps you see through the ocean of propaganda surrounding the war against Syria, including the bogus chemical weapons allegations. @KevorkAlmassian @KitKlarenberg
As @INakamitsu is fully aware, the Syrian chemical weapons narrative rests upon fraudulent @opcw investigations. This fact was brought to light by the OPCW's own scientists who blew the whistle on the corruption of the infamous Douma investigation. berlingroup21.org/front-matter-a…x.com/TalalAlhaj/sta…
1) In that case, the @opcw investigation covered up the report by NATO CW experts that these civilians were not killed by chlorine gas.
2) Exhaustive investigative reporting on the Douma case is available via @aaronjmate & the @TheGrayzoneNews. thegrayzone.com/category/opcw-…
The war against Iran is the endpoint for a regime-change war policy, enacted by the US & its allies, including Israel. It is underpinned by lies and deceptions starting with what happened on 9/11. This blatant false flag operation started the wars. #Iran ic911.org/commentary/the…
1) First, Afghanistan was attacked under the pretext that it harboured Al Qaeda, the alleged perpetrators of 9/11. This led to a 20-plus year war and casualties conservatively estimated at 176,000 people. costsofwar.watson.brown.edu/paper/human-co…
2) The US and its allies then constructed the now infamous lies about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction (WMD) and, simultaneously, implied Iraq was behind 9/11. The invasion of Iraq in 2003 led to a decade long and bloody civil war. academic.oup.com/psq/article/12…