NEW: ‘The judge, Mr Justice Swift, said he saw “no distinction” between a controversial talkshow host – or “shock-jock” – & career spies in Moscow seeking to disrupt British democracy.’ @lukeharding1968 reports for @guardian
Ben Bradshaw, Labour mp said: “This leaves our democracy defenceless against a hostile foreign power. The government has been wilfully negligent in investigating Kremlin interference in our democratic processes.“
"Every other western democracy takes this extremely seriously. Boris Johnson is looking away,” Ben Bradshaw said.
The court was told the Kremlin had mounted a troll driven disinformation campaign and a hack and leak campaign similar to that used in the US. Despite this, 5 years on the extent of the interference in UK elections & the Referendum remains uninvestigated.
@RhonddaBryant described the decision as 'extraordinary.'
The court heard "There was 'strong prima facie' evidence that Russia had interfered on the side of leave in the 2016 Brexit vote – and subsequently in the 2017 and 2019 general elections."
Peter Ricketts, former chair of the Joint Intelligence Committee said “Given the importance of knowing the extent of past Russian interference in assessing the risk for future elections, I do not understand why the government would choose not to investigate.”
Ricketts said he was 'very surprised' that the government had not sought evidence over Russian interference in the Brexit vote, nor carried out a post-referendum assessment of Russian attempts to influence elections in the UK.
The cross-party group of claimants 'were not seeking to overturn the Referendum result' but 'wanted the government to see what lessons might be learned, and to take steps to prevent meddling in future.'
Speaking outside the court, Alyn Smith, the SNP’s foreign affairs spokesperson said "the government had 'sandbagged' the Russia report by first delaying its publication, and then refusing to implement its findings."
“The ISC was a wake-up call. The government is refusing to wake up,” Smith said.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We have found that the UK gov paid substantially over the odds for many PPE items during the pandemic - once by as much as 226% - even when you take into consideration inflated prices caused by spiking demand. THREAD from @allthecitizens and @bylinetimes
Finding out how much the UK gov paid for PPE is not easy.
Most UK Covid19 contracts are redacted regarding quantity and unit price. Sections 43 of the Freedom of Information Act is used by the government to justify this. legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/36/…
Often, we can only work out price-per-unit because the total number of units is accidentally left visible.
But we found 3 contracts for hand-sanitiser where all appear to have cost HIGHER than the avg price, as recommended by the NHS-facing ‘Efficio Pricing Benchmark Analysis’.
Questions raised by @allthecitizens after we find two companies win £3.6m in gov contracts whilst clients for Tory lobbyist Simon Blagden. Blagden has donated over £300,000 to the party
THREAD:
Simon Blagden CBE has given £301k to the Tories personally and through 2 companies (Pietas/the Avre Partnership) in the last 2 yrs.
He’s a Leader's Group member, vice-chair of the British Italian Conservatives and industry chairman of the APPG on tech. ft.com/content/5bc434…
Blagden has 2 consultancies listed on the UK statutory lobby register; Avre Partnership and Larkspur International (as well as the above, Avre also gave to the Lib Dems pre-2015). …gisterofconsultantlobbyists.force.com/CLR_Public_Pro…
Should lobbyists be required to declare they’ve donated to political parties on the UK lobby register? We’ve found lobbyists Sir Lynton Crosby & business partner Mark Fullbrook have given £221,000 to the Tories personally / through 2 companies on UK's consultant lobbyist register
Sir Lynton Crosby and Mark Fullbrook are both political lobbyists and directors for the C|T Group (CT Corporate Advisory, CT Partners).
Combined they’ve given almost a quarter of million to the Tories. But you wouldn’t know this from the UK statutory lobby register.
CT’s director Mark Fullbrook - has personally donated £25,000 to the Tories.
Today @Dominic2306 revealed something @allthecitizens has been chasing for a while. That he, when a Special Advisor, conducted the business of government on WhatsApp - an encrypted messaging system that placed his correspondence beyond effective scrutiny.
Last year, our @iainoverton sent an FOI request to the Cabinet Office asking what information was held relating to the use of encrypted messaging software by its Special Advisors.
This was rejected with the claim "the information you requested is not held by the Cabinet Office."
However, Cummings - as a civil servant - clearly did have this information on his phone.
Note this: it is a potential criminal offence, according to the ICO, to "deliberately destroy, hide or alter requested information to prevent it being released."
NEW: June 21 re-opening shelved. Govt finally acknowledges exponential growth of new variant. Yet it’s *still* refusing to disclose data on schools. In this week’s newsletter @dgurdasani1 explains why this is such a scandal keepingthereceipts.substack.com/p/when-dido-me…
We’ve been banging on about this for last 3 weeks & we intend to carry on because this lack of transparency is literally a threat to life. @dgurdasani1 couldn’t say it any clearer. Full interview 👇 To support our work, please consider subscribing
Why haven’t scientists had access to the data? It’s absolutely infuriating that the govt has been allowed to bury this this crucial information. Secrecy & lack of outside scrutiny has allowed the govt to ignore the danger this new variant poses.
🚨NEW🚨
As a result of our legal challenge with our partner @foxglovelegal, the government had to admit Ministers and civil servants are allowed to set messages to delete instantly.
It's s YOUR WIN, because we could not have done it without your support. bit.ly/35gLZWCb
The admission from the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) was obtained though an @allthecitizens FOIA request
.@allthecitizens started a legal challenge out of deep concerns that self-destructing messages are being used to avoid scrutiny of decision-making processes, including on key issues such as the government’s coronavirus response.