Main takeaways from a webinar I just watched from the Equity Summit of the US Department of Education:
* Equity = school providing more to "those who have less" ("less" TBD by someone who is from a "marginalized" community)
* Non-white kids can't learn well from white teachers 1/
* The Fed. gov't needs to do MORE to ensure "equity" across the nation (those naughty states don't do it right)
* Kids know what they need school to be, let them tell you
* What they need (apparently) is more free stuff (like food, medical care, a ride, a phone, a tablet, etc)2/
* Getting people to give up on silly notions like "equality" under the law (where public dollars are being spent) is HARD WORK y'all!
* Universal pre-k is coming, whether we like it or not
* School needs to pull in ("replace") parents to meet all needs (for the "have-lesses")3/
* American taxpayers are stingy; teachers are still underpaid
* Only the education sector was "traumatized" by the pandemic (apparently)
* "Equity" must be CENTRAL to all we do
* "Representative" diversity matters more than diversity of ideas 4/
*America's core value is now "Justice"
* Meeting individual needs is paramount, as long as they're kids who "have less" than "others," whoever they are (you can guess).
* LGBTQ kids are going to war every day they go to public school, apparently. /END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's baffling to me that public employees -- public school TEACHERS especially -- can be so obvious they intend to subvert the U.S. Constitution and the values and laws enshrined therein, and get away with it. They're not just getting away with it either 1/
Teachers are being defended, and covered for, by elected officials who swore an OATH to "preserve, protect, and DEFEND the constitution of the United States of America!" 2/
Teachers are doing also conducting their Marxian revolution using impressionable children who are COMPELLED to sit and listen to them by the same gov't compelling their parents to pay for the "privilege" of having their kids shamed, abused, lied to, and EXPLOITED. 3/
To put the question of whether I'm "anti-white" b/c I oppose white identity/identarianism, here's what I would have said if I'd been in @realchrisrufo 's seat facing Marc Lamont Hill (a thread)1/
"Let's not engage in word games Marc, you're too smart for that. You hate, or resent, or want revenge against WHITE people specifically, and you are perfectly OK hurting white people, insulting white people, and even demonizing white people...2/
"Marc, you're just protected right now by this new definition of 'racism' that renders you (allegedly) blameless because you have black skin. Sorry, that doesn't cut it. Hate is hate, and you're obviously full of it." 3/
What would you do if you were required by law (still enforced, unfortunately for you) to keep all your documentation available to the public b/c they pay your salary, but you didn't want them to figure out you were robbing them blind to pay for turning their kids against them? 1/
Step 1: Word salad. You would write all policies about the brainwashing in words that sound benign or GOOD. You'd frame it as fighting BAD things everyone hates (racism, sexism, bullying, low self-esteem), but you're goal is the opposite, and you hope no one asks for evidence. 2/
Step 2: Deny. When anyone catches on, or tries to call you out on what you're doing, deny it using strong language like "Never" and "Nowhere" and "Nothing."
Step 3: Smear. If denial fails, smear the accusers, call them "racist," call them "white supremacist." 3/