McCarthy said of DC police officer Michael Fanone, who was badly hurt on Jan. 6 and has been trying to set up a meeting with him: “I'd gladly meet with him .. we gave him the phone number to the scheduler and said we'd love to meet with you. Unfortunately he hasn't followed up.”
Officer Fanone told me he finally spoke with a scheduler from McCarthy’s office today.
Fanone says he attempted to first schedule a meeting with McCarthy more than a month ago — on the day that Rep. Clyde compared the day’s events to a “normal tourist visit.”
But Fanone said the person who answered the initial call last month “was very disrespectful.” Then, the person passed the call off to another aide who gave an email address of the scheduler. He said he didn’t email the scheduler after he was treated rudely by the staff
Fanone denied that he was given a phone number to the scheduler as the leader asserted.
After McCarthy made his comments, Fanone says he got in touch with the scheduler today — and that aide took down his information and said they “would be in touch when he had availablity.”
Fanone added: “Trying to make an appointment with Kevin McCarthy is like trying to get an appointment with God.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Dem leaders have come up with a strategy to effectively pressure both wings of their party to fall in line behind the bipartisan deal and the reconciliation package -- with the hope of sending the bills to President Joe Biden's desk as early as September.
Pelosi said today that the House won't approve the bipartisan deal until the Senate passes the reconciliation bill first. That effectively pressures Manchin and other moderates to fall in line to back reconciliation proposal if they want to see their bipartisan deal become law.
Progressives, meanwhile, will be under pressure to back the bipartisan deal because it is expected to contain key authorizations of spending measures and an extension of transportation programs set to expire by Sept. 30, according to a source familiar with the matter.
Sen. Bill Cassidy, one of the key infrastructure negotiators, left a meeting and said: “We have a framework and we are going to the White House tomorrow”
He would not give any more details
Romney and Manchin both say there’s an agreement with the WH officials and 10 senators on infrastructure
They said it’s fully paid for and offsets the new spending. $1.2 trillion over 8 years
$579B in new spending
Cost is $974B over five years
Asked if there is an agreement on a framework, Warner told @morgan_rimmer and added “we would not be going to the White House tomorrow if there wasn’t one”
Schumer indicates Dems planning to go reconciliation on infrastructure. I asked him if he had confidence in Sinema-Portman talks. He noted they are “pursuing” reconciliation along with bipartisans talks. “That’s not going to be the only answer,” he said of bipartisan effort
Schumer: “We’re pursuing, a 2-path proposal. On the one hand there’s bipartisan negotiations, and those are continuing, the first were between President Biden and Senator Capito with just Republicans. Those seem to be running into a brick wall.”
Schumer: “But a bipartisan group … is trying to put something together that might be closer to what the President needs. And so we’re – that’s good – but that’s not going to be the only answer.”
Senate’s parliamentarian has ruled that there are clear limits to how senators use the filibuster-proof budget reconciliation process multiple times per fiscal year, per ruling provided by a source. There must be compelling economic reason + would have to go through full process
The ruling will NOT prevent Democrats from attempting to use the budget process again in the next fiscal year, which begins October 1.
Even before this ruling, however, Dems were unlikely to use this budget process again until the fall as WH talks with GOP on infrastructure.