Big news: The Senate just held a hearing on whether to get rid of the crack/powder cocaine sentencing disparity that has separated tens of thousands of Black families for decades. Here are a few things you probably don't know, and they will shock you to the core:
First, for seven years from 1988-1995 after Congress created the 100:1 crack/cocaine disparity, U.S. prosecutors chose not to prosecute a single white person for crack cocaine in Boston, Denver, Chicago, Miami, Dallas, Los Angeles, and 17 states.
Second, cops and prosecutors chose to use the harsh crack cocaine sentences almost exclusively against Black people, even though Black people were not even the majority of people who used or sold the drug!
Third, feds created the 100:1 disparity even though they knew there was no pharmacological difference between the two substances. Cops/prosecutors/judges sent generations of Black people to prison, many to die, because of this indefensible policy that they knew had no basis.
Fourth, over 10 years ago, the federal government finally admitted in public testimony what every expert had been saying for years: the crack cocaine disparity was racial discrimination and served no legitimate penological purpose whatsoever.
Fifth, in 2010 the Senate chose to only reduce the disparity to 28:1. I want you to pause on this for a moment: ***politicians knew it served no purpose and was discriminatory, but they allowed prosecutors and judges to keep doing it for more than a decade anyway.***
Sixth, in one of the most shameful moments in U.S. legal history, after a federal court overturned the disparity as unconstitutional discrimination in a ruling that would have freed 1000s of Black people, Obama DOJ got right-wing judges to reinstate it. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Congress now has an opportunity to end one of the most grotesque and flagrant racial injustices in modern times—part of why the U.S. incarcerates Black people at 6 times the rate of South Africa at the height of Apartheid. Will politicians do it? judiciary.senate.gov/meetings/exami…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alec Karakatsanis

Alec Karakatsanis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @equalityAlec

24 Jun
THREAD: A 57-year-old houseless man named Israel Iglesias died in the Houston jail on a $1,500 money bond. You should know the story of what police, prosecutors, legislators, and judges did to him. (1)
In October 2020, undercover Houston cops went to a “homeless camp.” They gave Mr. Iglesias cash from the City of Houston and asked him to get them meth. They say he got them 0.6 grams from another houseless man. They tipped him a few bucks of City cash and left. (2)
Four months later, in February 2021, the cops decided to arrest him for it. Maybe they wanted overtime cash? They took the case to the Harris County DA Kim Ogg, whose office decided to press charges. Iglesias was frail and had no money. (3)
Read 11 tweets
22 Jun
Thread: When working on bail in Alabama, we found a man trapped in jail for cocaine possession because he couldn't pay $500 cash. He had been there for 3 years, and the system had forgotten to give him a lawyer. What happened to him is important. (1)
After two years in jail, the man desperately sent letters to the court trying to figure out what was happening to him. (2)
The prosecutor and the court knew his rights had been violated but they chose not to release him or have a hearing about whether he should be kept in a cage for $500. Instead, they finally gave him a lawyer after a few more weeks in a cage. (3)
Read 8 tweets
21 Jun
Thread. Many non-lawyers don't have any idea what a sham criminal trials are in the United States. Did you know that virtually every piece of "forensic evidence" used in court to send people to prison for the last 50 years doesn't meet basic standards of science? (1)
In 2009, the National Academy of Sciences issued a landmark investigation into the evidence that police, prosecutors, and judges use to convict people. It found that, other than DNA, no forensic discipline met the most basic requirements for scientific rigor and reliability (2)
What does this mean? It means that the "experts" testifying about things like fingerprints, ballistics, arson, bite marks, etc... were not using scientific methods and couldn't meet basic standards of scientific reliability. (3) papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
Read 7 tweets
18 Jun
Breaking news: A California state judge has just sided with cop unions to strike down one of the most inspiring forms of direct democracy in modern U.S. history. If you don't know this story, you should. (1)
In the last election, voters overwhelmingly passed Measure J to amend the charter of Los Angeles. It was a visionary plan, resulting from years of organizing, requiring LA to shift *hundreds of millions of dollars* per year from incarceration to community based investments. (2)
Police, sheriff, prosecutor, and probation unions were outraged. They profit from endless expansion of the punishment bureaucracy. They brought a long-shot legal challenge to invalidate the democratic will of the people. (3)
Read 8 tweets
17 Jun
Huge story: The Biden administration has **still done nothing to cancel** the Trump administration's quiet plan to work with a for-profit surveillance corporation to end physical mail for people in prison and their families. The shameful program continues every day.
You can register for a webinar on how to fight against this monstrous plan here: us02web.zoom.us/webinar/regist…
I first reported on this plan more than four months ago, and the Biden administration appears to be happily going along with the Trump plan. Read more here:
Read 5 tweets
15 Jun
Thread: This the story of one of the most remarkable cases in U.S. history, and you’ve probably never heard of it. The story of what the U.S. government did to Ezell Gilbert is important because it explains how our legal system works as well as any case I have ever seen. (1)
In 1997, Ezell Gilbert was sentenced to more than 24 years in federal prison in a crack cocaine case. Because of mandatory sentencing (treating crack 100 times as severely as powder), he was put in a cage for a quarter century, and even the judge said this was too harsh. (2)
At sentencing, Gilbert saw an error that increased his sentence by about **ten years** based on a misclassification of a prior conviction. In 1999, without a lawyer, he filed a petition complaining about the mistake. The Clinton DOJ opposed him, and a court ruled against him. (3)
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(