1. For further competing interests as mentioned in "The Lancet", have a look at this official 2016 brochure from the EcoHealth/OneHealth organization/platform: idrec.ac.nz/user/file/88/J…
SIX of the Lancet authors (MacKenzie, Drosten, Daszak, Colwell, Carroll, Madoff) listed as members of OneHealth Platform supervisory board (page 14-15)
Mackenzie also listed as on Management board with Osterhaus on Page 11.
3. Speakers list (Page 2) spot the familiar names
4. a prominent member of this supervisory board is George Gao (Deputy Director-General of CDC PR China) and yes, conspiracy nuts, it is all connected ;)
as PREDICTED!
5. under "Supporting Partners" (page 20) and "Corporate Supporters" there are "Manufacturers of vaccines, antiviral medicines, antibiotics, diagnostic tools, antiparasitic agents or any other product or service that contributes to One Health"
"During shooting in Thailand, I was shocked by Daszak’s fast & loose with facts, his refusal to acknowledge his conflict of interest,& his denial of his gain-of-function res in collaboration with Wuhan lab"
You guessed right, i hope?
@janeqiuchina
She continued:
"I was equally shocked by Daszak’s constant self-promotion and how effective it was."
@janeqiuchina About the film:
"Blame: Bats, Politics & a Planet Out of Balance"
"Christian Frei seemed entranced by hero worshipping, apparently having lost all sense of objectivity & critical judgment. I felt strongly then, as I do now, that the film was a blatant piece of propaganda"
Bloody Hell, it's worse than even I imagined in my darkest nightmares about #scamdemia.
Time to spend some of this tax money on local electronics, biological, ecological, IT, optical, chemistry, engineering & physics labs run by local amateurs for the benefit of our communities?
Short 🧵on Primer & PCR Test issues (Pangolin Covs)
1. The key issue with pangolins and Pcovs is that:
It was discovered that the standard PCR tests used in 2020, and often still used, failed to actually detect many of the betacoronaviruses generously hosted by the pangolins.
2. Unless
The samples are retested with bespoke primers & more accurate PCR tests available now,
We will not know exactly whIch Pangolin (or bat) coronaviruses were hosted by Pangolins at WIV & elsewhere pre-pandemic.
However, "they" (I will name who they are later) should, and perhaps in the future, may retest the stored samples at WIV, IPB, SCAU AND GIABR, to clarify the question of which coronaviruses were present in their pangolin samples.
2. May have been for research and commercial purposes, but they were caught bang to rights.
"LIU initially stated that he did not know what the materials were and that someone must have put them into his bag"
3. When asked why someone would put them into his bag, LIU stated that he did not know, and that maybe he had accidentally put the materials there. After further questioning, LIU acknowledged that the materials were different strains of the pathogen Fusarium graminearum