So, not a doctor here, and I know nothing about Ivermectin. But I have a few questions for anyone willing to engage. I promise I won't press too hard, I appreciate anyone trying to honestly engage.
1. What would have to be true for 60 controlled trials, 30 of those randomized, no matter the size, to all be pointing in the same direction? What's our alternative explanation here?
2. What's the rationale for the FDA controlling use of a substance that's no more dangerous than certain kitchen spices? Forget effectiveness, given that we know it's very well tolerated, what's the rationale for not allowing people to make their own choices here?
3. Why is "it's an antiparasitic" a relevant argument? Do people not use their hands to open doors because they're "pen and keyboard handling instruments"? The adjective comes from the result, not vice versa.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
