The difference between liberals, conservatives & critical race theorists in one tweet
Liberals: 'America is failing to live up to its promises when it comes to equality'
Conservatives: 'No it's not.'
Critical Race Theorists: 'What promises? Those were never meant for everyone'
Fundamentally this is the key distinction. The right thinks racial disparities are the fault of those on the bottom. Liberals think we just haven't quite perfected our system. CRTs say this is exactly what the system was meant to produce...
One can agree or disagree with any of these, in turn, or perhaps come up with some hybrid of them if you choose. But to say one school of thought (CRT) is forbidden and too dangerous to allow people to hear is authoritarian thought control
we ought to be able to discuss and debate theories to explain racial disparity in America. And if the right is allowed to be taken seriously when it blames biology/genes (Bell Curve) or Black culture "defects" surely the left should be allowed to argue for systemic injustice
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My latest essay on how the attack on Critical Race Theory (and antiracist education more broadly) would require canceling the real MLK from being taught. Strategically, this is a key point to emphasize in our response to them. Pass it along...
The reason this is an important response to the right's attack on CRT and antiracist education is two fold: first, they are seeking to wrap themselves in MLKs words, by distorting the only line they know of his. We must prevent them from effectively doing that...
And second, by responding with material like that I quote in this piece -- most of it stuff few people have ever read or heard from King -- we can further present the real MLK, which is helpful in and of itself...
I love it when folks say the South is so patriotic. They typically mean white conservatives of course. But historically white conservatives have been the LEAST patriotic group. Don't believe me?
A quick thread.
First, they wouldn't even join the nation unless slavery was protected & strengthened via the 3/5 compromise, a fugitive slave return provision in the constitution and the extension of the trans-Atlantic slave trade for 20 more years (2)...
...not to mention the 2nd Amendment, which, as @ProfCAnderson demonstrates in her brilliant new book, The Second, was principally about strengthening the white militia so as to put down possible rebellions by enslaved Black folks (3)...
Your daily reminder that those who would ban antiracist education or Critical Race Theory would have to ban MLK. And the only reason people don't realize this is they've never read King or listened to any of his speeches except one misinterpreted line from one speech
THREAD...
After all, King recognized the systemic nature of injustice and how to address it when he said:
"...the problems of racial injustice and economic injustice cannot be solved without a radical redistribution of political and economic power.” (2)
He also was clear about white ignorance:
'Whites are not putting in a similar mass effort to reeducate themselves out of racial ignorance. It is an aspect of their sense of superiority that the white people of America believe they have so little to learn.' (3)
Conservatives say we shouldn't teach that racism was embedded in the U.S. from the start bc that ignores the progress we've made. But only by understanding how deeply rooted racism has been can we truly appreciate the victories of the abolitionist or civil rights movements (1)...
By downplaying how central white supremacy was to the founding & creation of the country, we minimize how incredible the anti-slavery and larger freedom struggles were. Progress only has full meaning when contrasted with the depths of depravity from which it emerged (2)...
Ultimately, the reason the right doesn't want us teaching about racism isn't so we can focus on progress, but so we can ignore everything against which we needed progress to begin with. These are people who say we need to MAGA, which means they think we didn't need progress (3)..
Obviously, I'm no fan of Greg Kelly or Newsmax, but the main interpretation of his since-deleted tweet about military service & race is pretty clearly inaccurate. That said, what he IS saying, or trying to say, is also tone deaf and worth challenging...
A THREAD
On Sunday, Kelly tweeted this (2)...
At first glance, and taken literally, it sounds amazingly white supremacist. But truthfully, it should be obvious he's trying to be funny and ironic. Sadly, right-wingers aren't good at either, so it falls flat (3)...
To understand white denial about American history, consider two photos. First, this pic of Hazel Bryan screaming at Elizabeth Eckford during the integration of Little Rock Central High. The date: September 4, 1957. As for the second photo, follow along...(1)
This is a promo pic for the TV show Leave it to Beaver: a much-beloved program, especially for white conservatives, who view it as a nostalgic representation of family life and the ultimate example of a more "innocent time..." But here's the thing...(2)
Leave it to Beaver premiered on October 4, 1957: one month to the day after that photo from Little Rock was taken. America was not innocent, and the evil wasn't only in the heart of Hazel Bryan or other Little Rock whites. It was a national sickness. One most whites ignored...(3)