Have historical perspectives ‘mattered’ to policy-making? Yes and no. On the ‘no’ side, senior policy makers may talk to historians, but don’t necessarily think they should heed us if we are saying something outside of the main narrative. #PandemicMethodologies.
On the ‘yes’ side, we get invited to more meetings. There are lots of interviews and media work. Sometimes important people tell me historical work is so important. But influence feels pretty indirect. Maybe history is running in the background? #PandemicMethodologies#PanHist
#PandemicMethodologies All the things we do to reach out matter. Public talks have always been sustaining for me. There’s give and take. I listen to pandemic stories people tell me. And share my favourite #PanHist work like @kelmme and Brenda Child.
My main Covid-19 policy projects have been with @RSCTheAcademies taskforce. Hundreds of scholars are working on immigration, migrant worker rights, policing, prisons, mental health, Indigenous health, anti-racism, vaccine hesitancy, homelessness... #PandemicMethodologies
Our recommendations: dual approach supporting public health’s capacity to respond AND addressing social inequities. We suggest more accountability on social factors that shape health outcomes, creating a public health culture, and empowering advocacy. #PandemicMethodologies.
#PandemicMethodologies Does history teach lessons that can guide public health policy and discourse? Some might say ‘yes’ and ‘it’s complicated.’ But if we want to have that voice, to speak out, we have the privilege. I try to do this work with humility, listen, not just talk.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh