This is true.👇The pandemic has brought scientific conversations into the limelight. (Yay!) Our new media ecosystem puts these conversation in front of a broad public, often without the translation, context & nuance provided by journalists and comms experts. (Yikes!) 1/
Talking about "vaccine hesitancy' among researchers is one thing -- people in the room know what the concept stands for. Using the term broadly all of a sudden puts a label on people who haven't been able to get the vaccine yet, or are unsure about the vaccine. 2/
First problem is, it puts hesitancy at the front of everyone's mind, instead of confidence. This is basic crisis communications! Don't say words you don't want people to be thinking about. If they measure hesitancy, should I be hesitant? 3/
More importantly, it focuses on the individual when so many barriers are structural. Continued lack of access to vaccines, esp for underrepresented communities, is a structural barrier. Historic distrust is a structural barrier. Low quality information is a structural barrier 4/
Currently, it's the CDC, HHS and other agencies that are driving the continued use of the term, even after many have called to abandon it. Here's the fearless @RheaBoydMD 's piece from March 5/
Why change a term we've been using for a long time?
It's scientific concept, we need to be precise in our language!
Except: No scientist will misunderstand what you mean if you use words like uptake, intent, readiness, acceptance, confidence 7/
@RheaBoydMD This year, I've had the privilege to work with the magnificent @dsallentess a bit, and watch her affect change.
How does she do it? Well, one thing I observed is, she's not afraid to change words. Because words are concepts, ideas, descriptors. Words matter. 8/
@RheaBoydMD@dsallentess Don't take it from me, take it from the leader on a lot of this work, @ProfHeidiLarson There's a reason she named her efforts the Vaccine Confidence Project, known on twitter as @vaccine_trust 9/
By choosing to take masks off early and pushing a "get vaccinated" narrative, the administration has made a risky bet.
The country is splitting. Not into dems vs. republicans. Or rural vs. urban. 11/
@RheaBoydMD@dsallentess@ProfHeidiLarson@vaccine_trust The country is splitting into those who live -- and have historically lived -- comfortably enough that vaccines are a question of a bit more education and a little nudging. Let's have a lottery! Let's do a shot for a shot! Let's have vaccines after church! 12/
@RheaBoydMD@dsallentess@ProfHeidiLarson@vaccine_trust On the other side, increasingly unseen (again) or only seen by those who bother to look, are millions and millions of people for whom a vaccine will only become possible when basic life needs are met. Food, jobs, physical safety. Access to high quality information. Education. 13/
@RheaBoydMD@dsallentess@ProfHeidiLarson@vaccine_trust It's like we're back to square 1. Great conversations about justice, equity, social determinants and health! Really insightful.
Now, let's tell everyone who is not getting vaccinated they'r 'hesitant', since it is so easy to get a vaccine anywhere, right? 14/
Also: getting the vaccine to homes of people with disabilities. Those who can't hatch a ride. Would love to see vaccination data for this group 16/
@RheaBoydMD@dsallentess@ProfHeidiLarson@vaccine_trust In Oakland, community orgs are wrapping vaccination conversations into layered services:
Come for the help with paperwork, basic supplies and other supports, stay to learn how you can keep yourself safe with a vaccine. 17/
Here is how you can make a difference today in the frenzy around the J&J pause announcement:
Immediately retire the term "vaccine hesitancy."
It's become a catch-all that misrepresents, blames people over systems, and doesn't help anything.
A brief thread
Let's start here: Millions of Americans are eager to get vaccinated every day. Among those who are not yet ready, most are considering their choices & have important questions about COVID vaccines. We want to answer those Qs every day, in all languages spoken, on all platforms /1
"Vaccine hesitancy" means it's all about people's behavior. That's convenient. Consider this: In a recent HIT/Rockefeller Foundation poll, 73% of people of color said they wanted to get vaccinated. 63% didn't know how to get the vaccine. What's this about, behavior, or access? /2
So, the triple whopper of 1) the Peter Navarro op-ed, 2) the CDC being stripped of it's role as the COVID data collector, and 3) director Redfield saying spikes in the south are due to Northerners traveling South (in the summer!) kept me up until 3 a.m. Let's look at this 1/
The Navarro op-ed, which I will not repost so no more traffic to it, should see the fate of the Mike Pence op-ed and be denounced. It isn't opinion but lies and even peddles hydroxychloroquine again. And @USATODAY just puts a disclaimer at the end! 2/
The problem with this is that for those who don't know all the details, it sows doubt. Navarro can not be all wrong, right? (He is. ALL. WRONG.) It's clever. Effective. These narratives stick. Look at this Newsmax clip & what @ashishkjha gets asked. 3/