Bar and Bench Profile picture
Jun 25, 2021 6 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Pro-active steps by Union govt during COVID first wave helped to quickly enhance Oxygen production during second wave: Supreme Court audit panel

#SupremeCourt #Oxygencrisis #COVID19India

Read FULL REPORT and story: bityl.co/7VzG
What is the truth on the report submitted to the #SupremeCourtofIndia panel?

Read FULL REPORT and story: bityl.co/7VzG
Who were members of the Sub Group of the committee appointed by the Supreme Court of India who submitted a interim report of Oxygen Audit of NCT of Delhi #SupremeCourtofIndia #SupremeCourt #ArvindKejriwal #Manishsisodia

Read FULL REPORT and story: bityl.co/7VzG
How was the Oxygen requirement in Delhi Calculated as per the interim report of submitted to the Supreme Court of India?

#SupremeCourtofIndia #SupremeCourt

Read FULL REPORT and story: bityl.co/7VzG
As per MOM (May 19) recorded in the interim report submitted to Supreme Court, the Sub Group agreed that Delhi Oxygen demand is around 400 MT due to "dramatically falling rate of cases"

#SupremeCourtofIndia #SupremeCourt #ArvindKejriwal

Read: bityl.co/7VzG
It was the presentation of Petroleum and Explosives
Safety Organisation (PESO) report (which is added as the annexure to the main report) that suggested that Delhi has demanded more oxygen than its required.

#SupremeCourtofIndia #SupremeCourt #ArvindKejriwal @msisodia

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Jan 9
Supreme Court to resume hearing its suo motu case on stray dogs today, marking the third consecutive day of proceedings in the matter.

Bench: Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and NV Anjaria

#Straydogs #SupremeCourt Image
Yesterday, the court had asked counsel opposing the removal of stray dogs from institutional areas to come prepared on a ToI article titled “On The Roof Of The World, Feral Dogs Hunt Down Ladakh’s Rare Species”.

Read yesterday’s coverage:

barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Sr. Adv. Krishnan Venugopal: in relation to the question of Ladakh, my client was also part of the issue. I have handed over a note on this aspect.
Read 13 tweets
Jan 8
Supreme Court resumes hearing its suo motu case on stray dogs.

Bench: Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and NV Anjaria Image
Amicus Gaurav Agarwal: the 4 remaining states mentioned yesterday have filed their compliances last night. So between yesterday's note and today's note, sixteen states are done, seven are left. I would need one more day to complete that tabular chart.
Sr. Adv CU Singh resumes his arguments.

Singh: apart from the vacuum effect etc mentioned yesterday, there is also a rodent menace. There’s also a problem of monkeys in institutional areas. We have annexed studies. When there is an abrupt removal of dogs, rodent populations shoot up and lead to unintended consequences. There has to be a balance. Your lordships know what happened in Surat 20-30 years ago.

Court: did that have anything to do with removal of dogs? On a lighter note, dogs and cats are enemies. Cats kill rodents so we should promote more cats and less dogs. That would be the solution. Tell us how many dogs you want roaming around in hospital corridors?
Read 59 tweets
Jan 7
Supreme Court resumes hearing its suo motu case on stray dogs.

Bench: Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta, and NV Anjaria Image
On the last hearing, the Court had directed the State governments and NHAI to ensure removal of stray animals from the highways across India. It had also ordered that government and private educational, health institutions should be fenced within 8 weeks to tackle stray dog menace and prevent stray dog bites.

The matter is listed today for monitoring compliance of these directions.

Read more:

barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Court: today we will hear everyone. The victims, the haters, the lovers.

Court analyses report submitted by amicus Gaurav Agarwal
Read 45 tweets
Jan 6
Supreme Court hears the Delhi Air pollution case

CJI Surya Kant: the amicus has filed a report which has some long term solutions

ASG Aishwarya Bhati: Let us go issue wise..

CJI: Yes we don't want to be super experts but a forum where expert opinions can be placed so that best practice can be adopted.Image
CJI: It is being said that heavy vehicles are contributing to it and then there is construction in NCR area..people need housing. So we have to see if construction is contributing it. If CAQM wants to come now after 2 months is not possible. That is like it's failing in its duty.
CJI: As I am speaking... vehicular pollution is now contributing to 40 percent.

Amicus: 2022 report of CAQM had conducted an exercise... But the plan is not in public domain
Read 14 tweets
Jan 5
Supreme Court hears plea by Telangana government seeking directions to halt the expansion works allegedly being undertaken by the Andhra Pradesh government to link the Polavaram project to Banakacherla or Nallamala Sagar without the required statutory approvals

Sr Adv AM Singhvi argues

#SupremeCourtImage
Sr Adv Singhvi: Addition of lift component near barrages was also not discarded. CWC just last month directed that no in principle consent should be given. The committee cannot be rendered infructuous before it is made.
CJI Kant: We are seeing whether there is a violation or attempt to violate the award by AP govt. Polavaram project is a central govt project and you are correct that nothing can be added or diverted without permission of centre.. so you can write to the committee

Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi for AP govt intervenes
Read 7 tweets
Jan 5
Supreme Court hears plea seeking reservation for specially abled lawyers in the Bar Council of India

Bench: CJI Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi Image
Sr. Adv. Manan Mishra (BCI Chairman): there is no scope for their adjustment in the main council. But we can make adjustments in committees.

CJI: ensure there is adequate representation.
Sr. Adv. Indira Jaising: they shouldn’t be asked to pay the fee for nomination form while contesting elections.

CJI: Mr Mishra, for specially abled persons you only charge a nominal fee when they contest elections. It can be a symbolic amount. Instead of 1.25 lakhs it could be 25000.

Jaising: 25000 may also be a little high.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(