The next bitcoin difficulty adjustment will happen around July 1, and will likely be the largest downward adjustment in bitcoin's history, around -19%.

The previous largest downward adjustment was -18.03% in 2011.

diff.cryptothis.com
We've had years of news reports about China banning bitcoin, so skepticism of the latest ban was justified, but it is clear now that mining in China has been massively disrupted. Network hashrate has dropped ~40% from 180 TH/s to 107 TH/s.

blockchain.com/charts/hash-ra…
Make no mistake, this was a devastating blow for Chinese bitcoin miners. They'll have to incur massive costs to transfer their miners abroad & run them again. The miners' secondary market is so overwhelmed with supply that producers suspended new sales
reuters.com/business/china…
For years we've heard people say bitcoin is vulnerable to Chinese control because of miner concentration in China. We now see the impact of China banning bitcoin mining, and so far, it is a price crash & a few weeks of slower blocks, thanks to bitcoin's difficulty adjustment.
As hashrate declines, blocks take longer. But every 2 weeks, difficulty adjusts, & when blocks are slow, it adjusts downward, so blocks start clearing faster.
It may take many weeks for this adjustment to complete, but blocks will go back to clearing at ~10 minutes.
What happens if more countries ban mining? More hashrate will go off the network, blocks will take longer, and difficulty will adjust downward until blocks clear on time.
The ban has also undoubtedly played a big role in the recent price crash. These miners obviously hold a lot of bitcoin, and dismantling or relocating their business will require them to sell a significant amount of coins they'd otherwise have held, crashing the price.
This was a gift from the CCP to the rest of the world's miners. Chinese miners' loss is the gain of the rest of the world's miners, whose machines now form a larger part of the hashrate, allowing them bigger profits.
The more miners are taken off the network, the more profitable the remaining miners become. Banning bitcoin mining somewhere just increases the incentive to mine it everywhere else. Difficulty adjusts & blocks go back to clearing quickly with remaining miners better capitalized.
Bitcoin mining can be performed anywhere with electricity, and it doesn't need to be connected to any infrastructure, it just needs an internet connection. Stricter bans would heavily finance the growth of undercover mining worldwide.
Mining hashrate could decline significantly, but difficulty would just adjust downward the network would clear blocks, and the remaining miners would become much more profitable, having to sell fewer coins, spurring the price upward, incentivizing more mining.
Difficulty adjustment is the magic sauce that makes bitcoin work.

It means that bitcoin mining grows & shrinks to the size it needs to survive & keep blocks clearing.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Saifedean.com

Saifedean.com Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @saifedean

17 Jun
Is bitcoin a waste? How efficient is bitcoin?

The latest podcast answers this with a full cost-benefit analysis of bitcoin, based on a chapter from my forthcoming The Fiat Standard.

Listen, subscribe, rate, and share on your favorite podcast apps:

saifedean.com/podcast/63-bit…
Run The Numbers:

Bitcoin costs: electricity & infrastructure

Bitcoin benefits: appreciating savings, money transfer, & obsoleting fiat & its costs:

-inflation, estimated at 2.5% of global GDP annually
-rising time preference
-economic distortions
-activist govts
-conflict
How to think of bitcoin efficiency: return/expenditure

return = total market value of bitcoin savings (~$800b)

expenditure = cumulative miner expenditure from day 1 (~$30b)

Bitcoin has created $800b of secure savings today from only $30b of investments over 12 years.
Read 6 tweets
10 Jun
All the shitcoiners complaining about bitcoiners being toxic to their shitcoin scams spent the year 2017 supporting Segwit2x, the most serious attack on bitcoin ever.

They have not once admitted this was a mistake, because they are happy to sacrifice bitcoin for their dumb scams
The next time an altcoin-promoting con artist tells you bitcoiners are toxic, ask them what they did in 2017 to fight the toxicity of the corporate takeover that wanted to force bitcoiners to adopt new consensus rules & destroy bitcoin's most important property: immutability.
Of all the supporters of the segwit2x attack on bitcoin, only the great Wences Casares has introspected, apologized & admitted his mistake. All the rest are unapologetic opportunist scoundrels who would gladly destroy bitcoin for whatever scam they're pumping this week.
Read 4 tweets
24 May
Fiater thinks bitcoin is a bewildering bubble while living in a world where governments owe $100t+ of low & negative interest rate debt while locking their people at home & arresting them for working.
Everything in fiat world is a bubble propped up by fake money: bonds, stocks, governments, education, housing, credit markets, etc...

But if you listen to fiat media & education, there are only two bubbles in history: tulips and bitcoin.
Tulip mania basically didn't happen, but fiaters use it as the bubble bogeyman because real bubbles are all very similar to modern fiat.

Example: John Law's Louisiana Purchase assignats were a devastating bubble, and functionally no different from QE.
smithsonianmag.com/history/there-…
Read 5 tweets
21 May
The latest podcast:

Elon Musk: The Fiat Rockefeller

Under gold, the richest man in the world, Rockefeller, transformed the lives of billions.

Fiat's richest man trades carbon & shitcoin scams & gets govt subsidies to build expensive toys for the rich

saifedean.com/podcast/57-elo…
To become the richest man in the world under hard money, Rockefeller, born in poverty, built the foundations of modern industrial society by providing billions with the infrastructure that allows them cheap & reliable energy for heating, cooking, production & transportation.
Under hard money, there's no alternative to providing people value to get them to give you money to get rich. The richest man in the world will be the man who provides the world with the most value & Rockefeller transformed the world.
Read 6 tweets
15 May
Bitcoin consumes so much energy because it uses a fully mechanical & digital process to ascertain truth. It doesn't rely on the authority of anyone.

It isn't a more energy-intensive way of doing consumer payments; it's a less energy-intensive way of achieving consensus than war.
All attempts to compare bitcoin energy consumption with banks, consumer payment technologies, central banks, or gold completely miss the point of bitcoin's real opportunity cost. Bitcoin doesn't replace these & they can, in principle, coexist with bitcoin.
Bitcoin replaces the need for strangers to have to be subject to the same government & central bank in order to trade internationally, which necessitates one government imposing its will on the rest of the world, which can only be done with war. Image
Read 7 tweets
15 May
Carbonhysterics coming after Bitcoin will be the end of carbonhysteria. Nobody does their homework as thoroughly as bitcoiners, while climate hysterics are either scammy careerist grifters or unthinking simpletons who believe marketing press releases.
Carbonhysteria is science by press release and intimidation. You can't keep a career in fiat unless you are hysterical about CO2. Bitcoiners can't be cancelled because they have hard money savings. You'll have to run the numbers & show the receipts to convince them. Good luck!
Here's a sample of what sane people who aren't making a living from spreading hysteria have to say on CO2 & climate:
@AlexEpstein: The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels.
@ShellenbergerMD: Apocalypse Never.
Steve Koonin: Unsettled.
@ClimateAudit: climateaudit.org
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(