The latest PHE surveillance report on Delta is now out. A flash summary on some key points.
The analysis of cases/admissions/deaths now helpfully includes an age split at 50. Of 109 deaths over 50, 38 were unvaccinated (a third), yet represent ~5% of that population.
1/
Nevertheless 50 who died had received both jabs. Remember though that no vaccine is 100% effective, and the risk factors are many times higher in the fully vac'd group because of the priority ordering.
In the last couple of weeks for which data is available, there seems to have been a big increase in the proportion of cases via hospitality, consistent with the reopening of indoor venues in mid May. Education setting fell with half terms.
3/
You can see here how the growth in Delta has been predominately in the under 30s groups, whom are only now going through the first stage of the vaccination programme. Even allowing for lower population numbers, there's much less prevalence at older ages. 4/
There's been a slight increase in the estimate of first dose effectiveness against symptomatic disease, but it's still only 35%. Against two doses it stays around 80%, but that's still twice the level of escape as for Alpha.
5/
In contrast, against hospitalisation there's no evidence (given the CIs) that it is any more or less effective than against Alpha, and after 2 doses is 96%.
So having that 2nd dose reduces vaccine escape from 20% to 4%, an 80% reduction is risk. You know it makes sense!
6/
The secondary attack rate comparison with Alpha has fallen this week to 35% (from 42%) as the estimate is refined with more data. That's more encouraging news. The absolute figure has fallen too from 11.4% to 10.7%.
7/
Thanks as always to the terrific team at PHE for producing this huge volume of data like clockwork each week, and for continuing to enhance the information in it. assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
8/8
Note also this interesting thread from @JamesWard73 regarding the inter-relationship between SAR for household and non-household contacts.
A great thread on the state pension and National Insurance.
For me, the trailed abolition of NI and thus its replacement by general taxation in terms of funding state pension benefits will have a major generational redistribution of tax.
It’s been the case that (in aggregate) at any one time the working generation funds the SPs of the retired generation above it.
2/
If the abolition of NI results in an increase (albeit smaller - else why bother) in income tax, whilst those in work will in total be better off, pensioners will be worse off.
3/
The Pensions & Lifetime Savings Association has updated its guide to living costs in retirement. The full report is well worth a read, and goes into a lot of detail.
One key point is that it assumes that pensioners own their home outright - probably reasonable now, but the shift to renting means that in future years that may become increasingly questionable.
2/
It focuses on retirement income, but note that other sources may be used to fund retirement, whether it be income from savings/investments, or gradual withdrawal of capital. Much more likely to be relevant for those aspiring to a comfortable lifestyle of course.
3/
UKHSA estimates that prevalence of COVID in England and Scotland has nearly tripled in the month since the ONS restarted its COVID infection surveillance.
Fortunately prevalence is lowest at the oldest, more vulnerable age groups, but is estimated at just under 6% in the 18 to 44 age groups.
2/
Prevalence is estimated to be highest in the London area, at just over 6% across the population. Note though that confidence intervals are wider due to lower sample sizes than in previous studies.
So with the news this morning that the earnings growth announced today means the state pension (SP) will very likely increase by another 8.5% next year, it's time to set out once again why the SP triple lock (TL) is such a bad idea.
1/
It's all down to cherry-picking the best of the three rates each year. I did a thread nearly a year ago, that hopefully sets out clearly how the mechanism inevitably means that the SP will grow over time against both earnings (E) and prices (P).
With BH's still distorting individual weeks' figures, the cumulative position gives a better view, with the latest CMI age-standardised analysis showing mortality 3.8% (of a full year's mortality) worse than its reference year of 2019.
Here's the mea culpa - it was only wrong by a factor of 13, but at least the post has been deleted rather than just corrected and left up, when experience shows that only a fraction of the original audience will see the correction.
So what are the true numbers?
2/
In E&W the peak week in 2020 was just under 9,000, and the second wave peak was pretty close to that number.
In total ONS has recorded 199,728 COVID related deaths in E&W since the pandemic started.