Can "everyday politics" breathe new life into the Left, in an age of populism & popularisation? Really interesting discussion on the @MileEndInst podcast, featuring @colm_m, @mds49 & @ea_robinson, inspired by Marc Stears' recent book: "Out of the Ordinary" anchor.fm/mile-end-insti…
As I argued here last month, "If there is one lesson that Labour desperately needs to relearn, it is its faith in ordinary people". gladstonediaries.blogspot.com/2021/05/starme… Image
As @mds49 noted, one challenge for the Left is that it rightly wants to talk about big ideas & heroic changes; but as soon as it does that, it risks becoming detached from the experience & language of normal life. I wondered whether there's a longer-term reason for that?[cont...]
Until the mid-C20th, even the most radical reformers had a language that was grand, heroic & inspiring, but also part of the rhythm of everyday life: the language of the Prayer Book & the King James Bible. Campaigns to abolish slavery, win votes for women &build welfare states...
... could promise the New Jerusalem, the coming of the kingdom & the gift of "our daily bread". They could lead their people out of slavery, lay the axe to the root of the tree & speak to the better angels of our nature, in familiar words & phrases rooted in collective activity.
In that respect, secularisation may have been a problem for the left: so much of its thinking & speaking is drawn from a religious age, but the words no longer "land" in the same way with a wider public. Perhaps another reason why the "ordinary" & the "awesome" have moved apart?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Robert Saunders

Robert Saunders Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @redhistorian

24 Jun
Fighting breaks out in the House of Commons in 1893. The newly-elected Labour MP, Keir Hardie, describes the scene for the papers.

"As for Mr Gladstone, he was pallid to the lips. To him it must have been as the desecration of the Ark of the Covenant to Moses of old."
Conservative MP Ernest Beckett: "‘I seized one of them [the Irish Members], at which three others threw themselves upon me and by sheer weight of numbers bore me to the floor … A general mêlée began, members striking out wildly at each other". Hardie takes up the tale...
The Unionist Edward Carson thought a Radical had started it, and blamed Gladstone. Conservatives accused the PM of failing to step in and stop the fighting. (Spoiler: he was 83 years old).
Read 6 tweets
24 Jun
No. The purpose of education is to give people the skills to live a fulfilling life.

Human beings are not just workers. We are citizens, neighbours, parents and friends - those who cannot work and those who can - and our lives are enriched by far more than our salaries.
Curiously, Conservatives used to criticise "socialists" for viewing humanity simply as workers. Keith Joseph, Thatcher's mentor, thought that the "economics first approach has aggravated unhappiness & social conflict". Angus Maude wrote this in a 1969 manifesto for Conservatism:
Even Margaret Thatcher thought that "man needs more than material things". The aim of government, she declared, was "to build a flourishing society – not an economic system".
Read 4 tweets
23 Jun
Reading the 1893 Irish Home Rule debates, when Gladstone - half blind, deaf, 83 years old - carried his Bill single-handed through the Commons, speaking more than 80 times (often at 1 or 2am) & delivering some of the greatest speeches of the C19th. And all I can think of is...
Like Christopher Lee, Arthur Balfour knew he was hopelessly outmatched. Image
Unfortunately, Lord Salisbury controlled the Upper House, and threw out the bill by one of the largest majorities in the history of the Lords: 419 votes to 41. Image
Read 4 tweets
22 Jun
One hundred years ago today, King George V opened the first session of the new Northern Ireland Parliament. "For all who love Ireland, as I do with all my heart, this is a profoundly moving occasion in Irish history." bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northe…
Speaking at the close of the Irish War of Independence, George hoped that the Northern Ireland Parliament might become a beacon of reconciliation to the Empire. "I appeal to all Irishmen to stretch out the hand of forbearance and conciliation, to forgive and to forget".
The King hoped that the opening of the Northern Irish Parliament "may prove to be the first step towards an end of strife amongst her people, whatever their race or creed" - and that one day he might return to open a similar Parliament in the South.
Read 4 tweets
19 Jun
The Lord Chancellor, Robert Buckland, warned this week that "the rule of law" must not "be misused to weaponise the courts against political decision-making". This is an excellent response by @GeorgePeretzQC (read the replies by @DinahRoseQC, too). Some thoughts of my own follow.
Buckland frames the govt's reform agenda as part of a programme to “restore trust” in the constitution. That’s a noble goal, but in practice it means that one party is rewriting the rules of Britain’s democracy against the opposition of every other. That cannot be safe or healthy
As usual, criticism of the courts is framed as a defence of Parliament. It's an admirable sentiment, but if the executive is "the servant of Parlt", why was it shut down in 2019? Why is it not allowed to vote on cuts to the aid budget? Why was it sidelined in the Covid crisis?
Read 10 tweets
18 Jun
In the days before opinion polls, by-elections were the only tool parties had for testing public opinion in the middle of a Parliament. It's no wonder they were so often astonished by what happened at General Elections!
By-elections used to happen more often. Between 1832 & 1914 there were more than 2,600 by-elections - about thirty a year. In the 1852-57 Parliament, 1 in 3 constituencies had a by-election. So the balance of parties in the Commons could shift radically between general elections
Arguably, that made Parlt more sensitive to changes across the electoral cycle. The Conservative & Unionist Party saw its majority fall by c.60 seats over the 1900-05 Parlt, through defections & by-elections. A party elected with a landslide in 1900 could no longer govern by 1905
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(