Share this page!

Maybe Scrolly?
Thomas Kirsop Profile picture
Twitter logo
25 Jun, 13 tweets, 4 min read
Random notes from first pass of proposed Canadian flavour restrictions at the federal level Image
Image
ImageImage
ImageImageImage
ImageImageImage
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
And now I’m agitated.

That is unproductive.

More later.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Thomas Kirsop

Thomas Kirsop Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MadMeathead

Thomas Kirsop Profile picture
27 Jun
Canadian proposed regulatory flavour ban. Chapter 3

Regulatory analysis section - initial notes.
Disclaimer: I have no training in the complexities of modelling. I am certain there will be things I miss. There will also be things I note that later turn out to be inconsequential.
Image
Read 31 tweets
Thomas Kirsop Profile picture
25 Jun
Canadian Flavour Restrictions -initial thoughts and opinions

Chapter 2: Instrument choice

Or

The Nuclear option is the ONLY option.
Option 1:
Status Quo Image
My opinion.
Adult Consumer Access maintained.
Legitimate Industry Impact unchanged.
Black Market Impact unchanged.
Youth Access unchanged
Read 17 tweets
Thomas Kirsop Profile picture
10 Apr
Let's talk about vaping/smoking relative risk statements in Canada. Why they are forbidden. How they were almost permitted and then disappeared, and why I think @PattyHajdu and @GovCanHealth are looking at RR statements from the wrong angle.

A Thread 1/16
May 2018. Tobacco and Vaping Products Act comes into force. Part IV, Div. 2, Sect. 30.43 (1) prohibits cessation claims (in Canada, cessation is considered an intervention). You can't say "quit" and you can't say "stop" with regards to smoking.

2/16
Sect. 30.43 (2) prohibits comparing vaping products and their emissions to smoking products or their emissions. You can't say better, less harmful, fewer toxins, or no smoke.

3/16
Read 17 tweets
Thomas Kirsop Profile picture
7 Apr
So Jennifer May, Vice President of Health Promotion & Govt. Relations for @LungSK gave the following OUTSTANDING quote to @ctvsaskatoon regarding vapour products taxation in Saskatchewan... (1/x)
Of course, no one thought to apply the basic principles of math and logic to the statement... so let us do that here shall we? I actually think I can make my point with just one publication from the Daily on the 2020 CTNS data www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/daily-quoti… (2/x)
Two things to note to get started... 1: Adults aged 25 and up. 854,600 said they had vaped in the last 30 days, 20-24 (legally permitted access) was 309,100 (3/x)
Read 12 tweets
Thomas Kirsop Profile picture
25 Mar
A "Highschool Educated" logical look at Canada's Tobacco Strategy and its target of 5% smoking rates by 2035 (A thread for @PattyHajdu @GovCanHealth and my "new friend" @PamDamoff)
Data Source #1

uwaterloo.ca/tobacco-use-ca…
Data Source #2

canada.ca/en/health-cana…
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @MadMeathead has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @MadMeathead!

Read all threads by @MadMeathead

:(