Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Jun 25, 2021 8 tweets 2 min read Read on X
The DOJ's complaint against Georgia is surreal.... Image
2/ Image
3/ Image
4/ So, basically, the DOJ is now litigating because legislators opposed to the legislation lost. Image
5/ OMgosh....Maybe the guy who called the law Jim Crow 2.0 wasn't invited for a reason??? Image
6/ And, sure, GA is responsible for some wacko white supremacist group that everyone denounced! Image
7/ WTFudge?? Image
8/ And finally the substantive claim: "with the PURPOSE of denying or abridging..." Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Margot Cleveland

Margot Cleveland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfMJCleveland

Aug 1
Also, I've gotten the question of is Trump going to SCOTUS? I thought they would because d.ct.'s ruling was sooooo nutso, but the appellate court stayed the lower court's holding IJ had to give him a hearing on avoiding removal on alternative grounds. 1/
2/ IJ held removable for lying on visa application and Khalil sought a hearing on whether IJ should waive that based on loving husband/father. New Jersey judge said IJ had to give hearing on that argument. Appellate court stayed that. So he is still removable based on that.
3/ I think Trump Administration decided it wasn't worth rushing & seeking SCOTUS involvement because SCOTUS wouldn't see a "rush" risk b/c alternative basis allows it to percolate for some time. Given timing & desire to not push too much, I get it.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 31
🔥Below is play-by-play 🧵of quick once-over of Appendix. My big picture take-away is this: The details reveal how corrupt the investigation into Trump was! They opened Crossfire Hurricane on the Presidential candidate with nothing, continued it with that nothing disproven AND 1/
2/ continued it during President's first term with more nothings and evidence that it was all fake. I care more about that fact and fact that Obama, Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Mueller, and more conspired to further hoax, along with media than that they ignored Clinton plan.
3/ This new evidence is damning of FBI's failure to investigate Lynch, Clinton, and others, and that's bad. But what's worse is what they did--target Trump to destroy his candidacy and then his presidency. It's also damning on Think Tanks & legacy media's involvement.
Read 5 tweets
Jul 31
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING Durham appendix released. 1/
3/ Whoa! Russia hacked Soros' Open Society Foundations! Image
Read 26 tweets
Jul 30
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: Exclusive. Scandal re Obama-ordered fake Intelligence Community Assessment or ICA on Russia election meddling just keeps getting worse. Documents reveal Brennan's buddy threatened to w/hold promotion to get him to go along with fake ICA. 1/
2/2 Why? Because DOD's DIA trusted the senior intelligence official and if he agreed with assessment, DIA would have signed on with CIA & FBI. @FDRLST with @MZHemingwaythefederalist.com/2025/07/30/exc…
@FDRLST @MZHemingway 3/ I see the notes have just been uploaded! dni.gov/index.php/news…
Read 4 tweets
Jul 29
🧵on why I did not release the memo summarizing the Judicial Conference. Apparently some folks are suspicious of why I did not publish the memo, so here's a thread explaining. 1/
2/ As footnote 2 from the DOJ complaint suggests, any summary of the Judicial Conference was lengthy and the memorandum I reviewed was as well, nearly 20 pages of internal discussions, none of which had ANYTHING to do with Boasberg's comments. Image
3/ Those discussions provided neither content or context to Boasberg's comments and were either held no news value or in my judgment and that of my editor, with whom we discussed the issue at length, any slight news value did not justify revealing the internal communications.
Read 9 tweets
Jul 28
🧵So just noddling on what the Durham appendix will include and thinking it will include quite a bit of details on intercepts of Russian Foreign Intelligence
(SVR) Service. 1/ Image
2/ Lots re Clinton: Image
3/ Yup: Image
Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(