Paul Poast Profile picture
Jun 26, 2021 24 tweets 10 min read Read on X
Here are 10 reasons why 🇺🇸 military officers should learn about the history of racism & racial discrimination in America.

[THREAD]
1) Understanding the American Civil War.

Racism, in the form of slavery, was a core reason the war that killed the most American soldiers was fought.

amazon.com/dp/B0044XV6G6/…
Indeed, once ending slavery became a key war aim of the Union, this ensured that the Europeans would not intervene on the side of the Confederacy.
2) Improving Battlefield Performance.

Improving the diversity and inclusion of a military can enhance cohesion & resiliency, thereby improving battlefield performance. @jaylyall_red5 wrote a whole book on the topic.

amazon.com/dp/B07WGWW3LY/…
Here is @jaylyall_red5 describing his research to
Joint Special Operations University
3) Winning Great Power Competition.

America's two major military competitors, 🇷🇺&🇨🇳, have terrible track records on treatment of ethnic minorities. See 👇&...
hrw.org/news/2020/01/1…
This seems like an area where the US could gain "soft power" advantage to complement & enhance the "hard power" provided by the US military.
wilsoncenter.org/publication/so…
4) Understanding the Cold War's End.

Building on #3, during the Cold War, the US EVENTUALLY sided itself with movements seeking racial equality at home & abroad. @marydudziak's book shows how and why.
amazon.com/dp/B006QNPIAC/…
Building up legitimacy (i.e. soft power) was a key reason the US was able to "win" the Cold War without direct major military confrontation with the USSR.

amazon.com/Human-Rights-A…
5) MLK was right.

In his 1968 "Beyond Vietnam" speech, Martin Luther King Jr explained how maintaining domestic support for the military's mission required improving race relations at home.

www2.hawaii.edu/~freeman/cours… Image
This passage in particular hits hard: violence at home feeds into US violence abroad (& vice-versa) Image
6) Improving Recruitment.

The enlisted ranks of the US armed forces are more diverse than the US population as a whole (though this is not the case at the higher ranks).

Source: cfr.org/backgrounder/d… Image
Understanding the reasons for the demographic makeup of the US military seems critical to improving recruitment, as discussed in this @CNASdc report
cnas.org/publications/c…
7) Improve Mobilization.

The US highway system came about in large part over concerns about domestic transportation & evacuation. There is a reason it is now officially called the "Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and DEFENSE Highways"

army.mil/article/198095…
But US highways are not always constructed in the manner optimal for achieving those aims. Too frequently, racially motivated policies led to the suboptimal design of the highways, especially in and around major cities. See @ClaytonNall's book.

amazon.com/Road-Inequalit…
8) Understanding how NOT to use the military.

During much of the 19th century, the US military was largely used for "imperial policing" against Native American nations. To see how racism both fed into this policy, see @richardmaass book.

amazon.com/dp/B07Z9M9M5R/…
Such a policy, then and now, is a poor use of the US military. See my piece with @WarInstitute @IrregWarfare
mwi.usma.edu/imperial-polic…
9) Understanding International Politics.

Military "hard" power is a (the) key instrument of international politics. If you are in the military, you should have an understanding of international politics.
Well, guess what is a central feature of international politics? Race. An outstanding summation was offered last year in @ForeignPolicy by @kelly_zvobgo & @meredithloken

foreignpolicy.com/2020/06/19/why…
As one example, race played a key role in shaping US policy towards entry (or not) in World War I
10) US military officers are US citizens.

Race has been central to US politics and political development since its founding (I mean, it's right there in the Constitution) Image
Indeed, racially discriminatory policies are a key reason why scholars question when the US actually became a democracy
In sum, there are actual war fighting, national security, and good citizenship reasons that US military officers should learn about the role of race in the history and policies of the United States.

[END]

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul Poast

Paul Poast Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfPaulPoast

Apr 21
The House passed a defense supplement for Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan.

Ukraine aid was the most controversial portion of the supplement and might cost Speaker Johnson his leadership position.

Why did he do it?

[THREAD] Image
As is being reported, Johnson stated “To put it bluntly, I would rather send bullets to Ukraine than American boys. My son is going to begin in the Naval Academy this fall....This is not a game, this is not a joke.”
cnn.com/2024/04/21/pol…
While it's partly personal for Johnson, his remarks emphasize a larger point, one that I raised in a recent @WPReview column: cutting off US aid won't end the war. Instead, it would embolden Russia.
worldpoliticsreview.com/us-ukraine-aid…
Read 19 tweets
Apr 20
Let's do this.

A close reading of Donald Trump's recent description of the Battle of Gettysburg.

TL, DR: there were no pirates.

[THREAD] Image
ICYMI, here is a clip of what Trump said about the Battle of Gettysburg at his recent Pennsylvania rally

Let's start at the beginning:

"The Union was saved by the immortal heroes at Gettysburg"
Read 30 tweets
Apr 14
Are we on the brink of a larger Middle East War?

The risk increased in the past day, but is still low.

[SHORT THREAD]
Many of the points raised in 👇 🧵 from October still apply: larger wars happen because states want to be drawn in.

Is that still the case?
This @goodauth piece from October made related points about the tools states -- specifically Iran and Israel -- can use to control escalation.

goodauthority.org/news/will-the-…
Read 9 tweets
Apr 13
"International law is fake law."

"The only real law is domestic law."

Both statements are wrong. In some sense, the opposite might be true.

[THREAD] Image
As I wrote recently in @WPReview, international law is flawed. But flawed shouldn't be confused with pointless.

worldpoliticsreview.com/war-gaza-inter…
I emphasized how international law is part of a broader diplomatic process where states try to convey their preferences over policy.

In other words, from signing a treaty to filing a ICJ dispute, international law provides information.

journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…
Read 20 tweets
Apr 6
To truly understand the current value of NATO, you need to think about a world without NATO.

Such "counterfactual thinking" lies at the heart of policy analysis...and IR scholarship.

[THREAD] Image
This 🧵 builds on my latest @WPReview piece. I argued that NATO is more valuable than ever to its members. But how do we actually know that?

worldpoliticsreview.com/nato-ukraine-r…
The key is to ask, "if NATO wasn't here, what would happen?"
Read 26 tweets
Mar 30
NATO turns 75 years old this coming week.

To mark the event, here are 7 (and a half) historical facts about NATO.

[THREAD] Image
These facts draw from the #NATO7for70 series of 🧵 I wrote during NATO's 70th anniversary (along with *half* a new one). So this is essentially a 🧵 of🧵s.
Fact 1: NATO almost didn't happen. The negotiations were contentious, with France (yep, France) almost scuttling the whole deal. Lot's of contention over the treaty covering Algeria (then part of France) and including Italy.

Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(