Paul Poast Profile picture
Jun 26, 2021 24 tweets 10 min read Read on X
Here are 10 reasons why 🇺🇸 military officers should learn about the history of racism & racial discrimination in America.

[THREAD]
1) Understanding the American Civil War.

Racism, in the form of slavery, was a core reason the war that killed the most American soldiers was fought.

amazon.com/dp/B0044XV6G6/…
Indeed, once ending slavery became a key war aim of the Union, this ensured that the Europeans would not intervene on the side of the Confederacy.
2) Improving Battlefield Performance.

Improving the diversity and inclusion of a military can enhance cohesion & resiliency, thereby improving battlefield performance. @jaylyall_red5 wrote a whole book on the topic.

amazon.com/dp/B07WGWW3LY/…
Here is @jaylyall_red5 describing his research to
Joint Special Operations University
3) Winning Great Power Competition.

America's two major military competitors, 🇷🇺&🇨🇳, have terrible track records on treatment of ethnic minorities. See 👇&...
hrw.org/news/2020/01/1…
This seems like an area where the US could gain "soft power" advantage to complement & enhance the "hard power" provided by the US military.
wilsoncenter.org/publication/so…
4) Understanding the Cold War's End.

Building on #3, during the Cold War, the US EVENTUALLY sided itself with movements seeking racial equality at home & abroad. @marydudziak's book shows how and why.
amazon.com/dp/B006QNPIAC/…
Building up legitimacy (i.e. soft power) was a key reason the US was able to "win" the Cold War without direct major military confrontation with the USSR.

amazon.com/Human-Rights-A…
5) MLK was right.

In his 1968 "Beyond Vietnam" speech, Martin Luther King Jr explained how maintaining domestic support for the military's mission required improving race relations at home.

www2.hawaii.edu/~freeman/cours… Image
This passage in particular hits hard: violence at home feeds into US violence abroad (& vice-versa) Image
6) Improving Recruitment.

The enlisted ranks of the US armed forces are more diverse than the US population as a whole (though this is not the case at the higher ranks).

Source: cfr.org/backgrounder/d… Image
Understanding the reasons for the demographic makeup of the US military seems critical to improving recruitment, as discussed in this @CNASdc report
cnas.org/publications/c…
7) Improve Mobilization.

The US highway system came about in large part over concerns about domestic transportation & evacuation. There is a reason it is now officially called the "Dwight D. Eisenhower National System of Interstate and DEFENSE Highways"

army.mil/article/198095…
But US highways are not always constructed in the manner optimal for achieving those aims. Too frequently, racially motivated policies led to the suboptimal design of the highways, especially in and around major cities. See @ClaytonNall's book.

amazon.com/Road-Inequalit…
8) Understanding how NOT to use the military.

During much of the 19th century, the US military was largely used for "imperial policing" against Native American nations. To see how racism both fed into this policy, see @richardmaass book.

amazon.com/dp/B07Z9M9M5R/…
Such a policy, then and now, is a poor use of the US military. See my piece with @WarInstitute @IrregWarfare
mwi.usma.edu/imperial-polic…
9) Understanding International Politics.

Military "hard" power is a (the) key instrument of international politics. If you are in the military, you should have an understanding of international politics.
Well, guess what is a central feature of international politics? Race. An outstanding summation was offered last year in @ForeignPolicy by @kelly_zvobgo & @meredithloken

foreignpolicy.com/2020/06/19/why…
As one example, race played a key role in shaping US policy towards entry (or not) in World War I
10) US military officers are US citizens.

Race has been central to US politics and political development since its founding (I mean, it's right there in the Constitution) Image
Indeed, racially discriminatory policies are a key reason why scholars question when the US actually became a democracy
In sum, there are actual war fighting, national security, and good citizenship reasons that US military officers should learn about the role of race in the history and policies of the United States.

[END]

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul Poast

Paul Poast Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfPaulPoast

Jun 15
When you hear "Liberal International Order", just think "the G-7, for better and for worse"

[THREAD] Image
While some scholars and policy makers like to speak of the "Liberal International Order" as the collection of post-World War II international institutions....
cambridge.org/core/journals/…
...the phrase itself is much more recent in origins, largely a product of the mid-1990s. Image
Read 19 tweets
Jun 8
Are the "opportunity costs" of arming Ukraine too high?

Short answer: no

Long answer: compared to what?

[THREAD]
For those not aware, I am asking this question because of a new International Affairs piece that makes the argument "yes, they are too high"

academic.oup.com/ia/advance-art…
Overall, their argument is that the resources going towards Ukraine would be better allocated to address other pressing global challenges.
Read 24 tweets
Jun 1
In international politics, population is destiny.

[THREAD] Image
As I wrote in my latest for @WPReview, shifting patterns in population growth will inevitably influence international politics.
worldpoliticsreview.com/global-demogra…
This isn't a new idea. It's one found in classic works on change in world politics.

amazon.com/War-Change-Wor…
Read 14 tweets
May 18
What's wrong with the word "genocide"?

[THREAD]
To be clear, I think we need to talk more about genocide in my discipline, International Relations.

And there is still much about genocides in the past that we don't understand...

tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…
Read 17 tweets
May 11
Should everyone have nuclear weapons?

That's the core question in the Waltz-Sagan debate

[THREAD] Image
In my latest @WPReview thread, I wrote about another debate: whether nuclear weapons actually deter.
worldpoliticsreview.com/nuclear-weapon…
I pointed out the difficulties in answering that question, namely that we don't actually know when deterrence works (i.e. selection bias)...
tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.108…
Read 22 tweets
May 4
Does the United States have a responsibility to protect the civilians of Gaza?

[THREAD] Image
In my latest @WPReview column, I wrote of the downfall of "Responsibility to Protect" or R2P.

worldpoliticsreview.com/us-foreign-pol…
R2P is "the responsibility to protect its populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity". This means nations can't hide behind the barrier of "sovereignty" to stop interventions.

un.org/en/genocidepre…
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(