Thread by @uberfeminist

surely this will age well

Bret Weinstein's podcast getting a shoutout from RFK Jr is just perfect

these are the paper authors cited by Robert Malone.

Robert Malone was the only MD on Bret Weinstein's podcast panel, and these are his sources @RWMaloneMD

Robert Malone seems to be particularly impressed by an alt medicine quack, a guy that thinks paleo cures cancer, and a guy that is really impressed with his ability to force open luggage locks

recall Bret Weinstein and his brother Eric Weinstein believe that peer review is an 'autoimmune disease'

https://twitter.com/uberfeminist/status/1219393196049846273

Eric Weinstein also believes himself to be the inventor of Seiberg–Witten equations

https://twitter.com/uberfeminist/status/1219416433714585601

either

Harvard tried to steal Eric's PhD, pension, parent benefits
& he found Seiberg–Witten first
& his wife solved econ
& he solved physics
& feedback was Greider plot to end Bret
& Building 7 is inexplicable
& Pfizer will kill you

or... the Weinsteins are just dumb assholes

here is Eric Weinstein sharing some Building 7 conspiracy theory

here is Eric Weinstein trying to imply that he predicted the housing crash, when in reality he wrote an extremely boring paper talking about how certain securities could be expected to pay due to the volatility's inherent link to rewards

in 2009, PZ Myers called vaccines 'settled science' and called Bill Maher 'ignorant'

Bret Weinstein called PZ Myers 'smug' and referred to his position as 'weak'.

Has Bret Weinstein been antivax all this time?

Bret Weinstein just isn't good at making any sense at all

"we don't know much about this at all, except that it's definitely all about fucking and also that perfumes, like, definitely completely ruin the whole purpose of the thing that it most definitely does"

THE PAPER DIDN'T EVEN LAST A WEEK

ROBERT MALONE DELETED HIS TWEET

hahahahahhaahahahaha mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/7/…

wait, you're telling me that a paper that had this guy as a primary author was RETRACTED?

yes, that's exactly what i'm saying 😂😂😂😂😂

don't bet against me

let the record show that @RWMaloneMD didn't even need to read the paper, all he needed to do was check Walach's wikipedia page to find out that the primary author is a total fucking goofball.

imagine having Robert Malone as your family's physician. what a fucking nightmare!

Walach also published an article in JAMA saying that masks give kids hypercapnia.

any wagers on when this paper will also be retracted?

jamanetwork.com/journals/jamap…

here is Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying:

- saying 'a cabal' is pushing vaccines
- saying Israeli authorities are changing data to make vaccines look good
- endorsing the retracted Walach study, calling it 'conservative' and suggesting we kill 2 kids to save 3 old people

Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying:

- will tell you that ivermectin works, but cannot tell you why they don't believe the same about hydroxychloroquine
- will tell you that the mRNA vaccines are scary, but cannot tell you why they haven't just taken the J&J shot

Bret Weinstein & Heather talk paper retraction

Instead of discussing their errors, Walach's errors or Walach's history, they:

- say retractions are sometimes political
- question history of journal itself
- question peers that should have caught it
- complain about mean people

Bret Weinstein & Heather Heying looked at a paper, read aloud the conclusion that mRNA vaccines were going to kill hundreds of thousands of Americans, and then when proved wrong they lash out at critics and the journal itself instead of addressing their own credulity

Walach is a nutjob.

Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying are nutjobs.

When faced with their inability to detect a nutjob, they get mad at third parties they expect to be protecting them from all the nutjobs.

take some fucking responsibility

if you want to say Bret Weinstein & Heather Heying made an honest mistake, please just skim Walach paper, then look up his name, & then look up the co-authors & their supposed relevant experience.

it will take you two minutes.

Ask yourself, why didn't Bret have two minutes?

if you are a real Bret Weinstein fan, you're going to say 'just because Walach is a loon, it doesn't mean he was wrong! He could be Galileo'.

Not the point. Walach being a loon should have given Bret pause, instead of irresponsibly livestreaming the fucking paper.

Bret Weinstein & Heather Heying demonstrated absolutely no intention to read the Walach paper or revisit the paper, they only issued a retraction because enough people gave them shit on twitter. They cannot be trusted to follow up.

if Bret Weinstein & Heather Heying didn't spend the two minutes of bullshit detection necessary before going live, what makes you think they were going to spend an entire evening reading paragraphs of that very same document?

if you believe this shit... you're beyond hope