On this day in 1954, the United States backed a coup against Jacobo Árbenz, the progressive, democratically elected leader of Guatemala, because he sought to restore land to small farmers and Indigenous communities that had been dispossessed by US fruit companies.
This move ended 10 hopeful years of democracy in Guatemala. The US went on to install and support a series of brutal right-wing dictatorships that ruled for 42 years, and massacred up to 200,000 Indigenous Mayans for resisting land grabs.
US intervention and collusion with right-wing regimes has utterly destabilized Guatemala, and much of the rest of the region. As the Biden administration seeks to discover the "root causes" of migration from central America, they would do well to look in the mirror.
This happened only a year after the US-backed coup in Iran, and was one of many that would be inflicted across the global South over the decades that followed. I summarize this history in The Divide; here is the section that covers Arbenz:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The G7's promises of charity are *not* a solution to vaccine apartheid. We need justice: waive the patents and enable global South countries to ramp up vaccine production. Our argument in the BMJ: gh.bmj.com/content/6/6/e0…
"Charitable donations are designed to deflect the substantive demands for reform that global South countries are fighting for. This approach will not work, because it is not designed to ‘work.’ If we want to end vaccine apartheid, we need to target the root causes."
"Rich countries and their pharmaceutical companies are using COVAX as a shield to deflect demands for IP waivers. This is an enduring problem with aid: it papers over and distracts our attention away from the underlying structural violence."
My eyes popped when I saw this. The European Environment Agency has acknowledged that green growth is "unlikely" and calls for post-growth and degrowth alternatives to be integrated into EU policy. eea.europa.eu/publications/g…
"Economic growth is closely linked to increases in resource use and has detrimental effects on the natural environment and human health. It is unlikely that a long-lasting, absolute decoupling of economic growth from environmental pressures and impacts can be achieved."
"The ongoing Great Acceleration in loss of biodiversity, climate change and pollution is tightly coupled to economic activities and economic growth."
"Technological development has so far been associated with increased consumption rather than the reverse."
A powerful intervention from the anthropologist Peter Metcalf. He shows how data on rising incomes in Borneo obscure a darker reality of dispossession and impoverishment, as Indigenous subsistence economies are ripped up for timber and palm oil. aljazeera.com/opinions/2021/…
"We’re told that growth is good. We’re told that more income lifts people out of poverty and improves their lives. This narrative is drilled into us by development institutions and echoed by media outlets. But what I have witnessed calls this simplistic story into question."
"In the 1970s, the Indigenous communities had virtually no money, but they lived well. Now they have money, and can barely feed themselves. They have been impoverished even as incomes rise. It is a story of destitution that is completely obscured by the GDP growth statistics."
The Land Back movement unites the struggle for decolonization with climate justice and ecological regeneration.
"Our struggle is interconnected with the struggles of all oppressed Peoples."
"Only when Mother Earth is well, can we, her children, be well." landback.org
"To truly dismantle white supremacy and systems of oppression, we have to go back to the roots. Which, for us, is putting Indigenous Lands back in Indigenous hands."
"The closure of Mt Rushmore, and the return of all public lands in the Black Hills, is our cornerstone battle."
Here is a good overview of the movement, in the words of four Indigenous leaders: grist.org/fix/indigenous…
The new IEA report on net-zero is a big step in the right direction, and its call to cease all new fossil fuel projects has grabbed headlines, which is welcome. But the report also has some serious problems that are worth discussing:
First, in order to maintain the assumption of economic growth-as-usual in rich countries, it relies on unprecedented rates of GDP/energy decoupling, to an extent that has been questioned repeatedly in the empirical literature.
Second, it achieves this decoupling in large part by relying on efficiency improvements, but the model does not take adequate account of rebound effects, which have been identified as a significant problem.
This new paper in Nature is a real breakthrough. It suggests that if we want to achieve the 1.5C climate target without relying on risky negative emissions schemes or speculative assumptions about GDP/energy decoupling, we need degrowth in rich countries. nature.com/articles/s4146…
Also, the degrowth scenarios in this paper propose a convergence in per capita energy use between global North and South - a core principle of global justice that is neglected by all existing IPCC scenarios. Hopefully this establishes a strong new precedent.
If you're a journalist, or if you have a podcast or radio show, this is a story worth covering - and you can reach the lead author at @LorenzClimate.