$TSLA Autopilot engineer CJ Moore, of DMV fame, admits that the "Autopilot computer" can itself...crash. Rarely. But it does happen.
When an automobile crash happens, $TSLA receives "on the order of seconds" worth of data from the vehicle's buffer, according to Moore.
Moore's testimony does not seem to be entirely accurate here. If there is no microphone, then it would be impossible to process voice commands. $TSLA
Moore distinguishes between different kinds of data buffers, which is a point never made when Elon Musk or other $TSLA representatives discuss the "billions of miles" recorded.
Who is in charge of Autopilot crash investigations at $TSLA? No one, according to Moore.
"the vehicle was not detected as a vehicle"
This is probably the clearest statement on the record from $TSLA about why radar is crucial for driver assistance systems. It's certainly different than what we have heard so far.
It must be very uncomfortable to maintain, under oath, that your software was working properly to accomplish its narrow purpose and that in so doing it led to your customer being decapitated. $TSLA
According to one of the people who built Autopilot for $TSLA, it is "not capable of detecting a general hazard." (Or from other examples, a traffic cone.)
On August 8, 2019, Elon Musk accused @AaronGreenspan of "putting people's lives at stake" for questioning $TSLA's safety claims.

About a year later, CJ Moore refuses to answer in the affirmative when asked if Autopilot is safer than a human driver—a claim Musk has made often.
@AaronGreenspan Is the problem that killed this person fixed today? According to $TSLA, no, not really. Shrug.
@AaronGreenspan An interesting answer given the "But there weren't any road lines" debate from Houston, Texas recently. $TSLA
@AaronGreenspan "...I would just reiterate the point that the system was working as intended..."

At $TSLA, user death and subsequent litigation equals "working as intended."

Wow.
@AaronGreenspan When someone dies in a $TSLA and Autopilot is involved, analysis of that crash and whether it could have been avoided...isn't recorded anywhere?
@AaronGreenspan Or maybe it is, but we CC the lawyers so it can be claimed to be attorney-client privileged. (Both of these explanations cannot be true.)
@AaronGreenspan For his part, Elon Musk claims he doesn't really know much more about this Autopilot thing than anyone else, and besides, he's so busy launching people and things into space that he couldn't possibly be bothered to be deposed about a customer's avoidable death. $TSLA
To see these documents and more, visit the case on PlainSite (and support our research by signing up for PlainSite Pro or Pro Se!): plainsite.org/dockets/40e7vo… $TSLA
We're putting the law in plain sight. $TSLA

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with PlainSite

PlainSite Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PlainSite

28 Jun
WRONG. The COMPLAINT is dismissed. The case is NOT dismissed.

Come on. It literally says this in the opinion.
"not the case" $FB
But what would you expect from @joshua_sisco, who works for Mark's buddy's wife?
Read 4 tweets
27 Jun
Introducing a new feature on PlainSite: Flags. While we always try to be true to the government sources of documents on PlainSite, including court dockets, sometimes those documents are just incredibly complex to navigate.
It makes no sense to post information so complex or voluminous that people get lost in the noise. We now can highlight documents that are especially important and of public interest. Lawyers and notaries have done something similar for years on paper with colored plastic tabs.
(That's the inspiration for PlainSite's logo.) And now we have the digital equivalent, starting with Elon Musk's deposition transcripts in the Tesla/SolarCity merger case. $TSLA
Read 5 tweets
16 Jun
This is a smoking gun e-mail. Since August 2019 at least, the California DFPI has known that Tether and similar "stable coins" pose a risk to anyone using the financial system. Yet Bob Venchiarutti has opted to do precisely nothing about it.
Then, in December 2020, Tether Limited registered with FinCEN—as it should have years earlier—as a Money Services Business under the Bank Secrecy Act. Two problems: it doesn't have state licenses required everywhere that Tethers are used, and it lied about where that is.
This is as brazen and consequential a violation of 18 U.S.C. 1960 as there ever has been: operation of an unlicensed money transmitting business. It's also a violation of the California Money Transmission Act. There is no DFPI or predecessor legal opinion exempting stable coins.
Read 12 tweets
16 Jun
New! California DFPI Documents Regarding Cryptocurrency Part II: plainsite.org/documents/2e4p…

With special guest appearance from @pmarca! $COIN
@pmarca The California DFPI is hard at work regulating cryptocurrency companies. Audits and capital controls are obsolete, having been replaced by back-scratching, congratulatory platitudes, and golf.
@pmarca From the Inmates-Running-The-Asylum Department... $COIN
Read 5 tweets
15 Jun
Did someone say they wanted 300 pages of documents about cryptocurrency regulation? $COIN
New! California DFPI Documents Regarding Cryptocurrency Part I: plainsite.org/documents/2dkk… $COIN
When Tether blows up, remember that it was on Robert Venchiarutti's watch. Image
Read 6 tweets
14 Jun
CNBC has been running a factually false front-page headline for pretty much all of Sunday, both before and after it was updated. Elon Musk did not say that $TSLA *will* accept bitcoin again *as* something has happened. He said the company *might* depending on future conditions. Image
Editors write headlines, not reporters. But this is particularly unacceptable as the same network also notes that this "news" has led to a price boost in BTC of 13%. Whoever wrote and/or approved this is utterly brain-dead, should be fired, and should never work in media again.
In short, if you can't tell the difference between what did happen and what might happen, get away from the content management system.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(