SpaceX has filed for FCC approval to fly Starlink terminals on the Super Heavy and Starship vehicles during the orbital launch demonstration. The requested start date is Aug. 1, meaning no launch in July if SpaceX wants to fly with Starlink onboard.

apps.fcc.gov/oetcf/els/repo…
"SpaceX intends demonstrate high data rate communications with Starship and the Super Heavy Booster on the ground at the launch site in Starbase, TX during launch, during booster recovery, in flight, and during reentry."
"Starlink can provide unprecedented volumes of telemetry and enable communications during atmospheric reentry when ionized plasma around the spacecraft inhibits conventional telemetry frequencies."
"The terminals will use the same antenna and communications electronics as SpaceX’s previously authorized consumer terminals but with a revised enclosure and mounting that is suitable for the mission profile."
I have attached the exhibit with additional details to this forum post.

forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topi…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Baylor

Michael Baylor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nextspaceflight

16 Apr
"I agree with the SEP’s assignment of a significant strength for SpaceX’s proposed capability to substantially exceed NASA’s threshold values or meet NASA’s goal values for numerous initial performance requirements."
"I note that the SEP did not identify any significant strengths within Blue Origin’s technical proposal. Nonetheless, Blue Origin’s proposal has several attractive technical attributes."
"I note that while the SEP evaluated several positive attributes for Dynetics’ technical approach under this factor, none of them resulted in the assignment of a significant strength."

nasa.gov/sites/default/…
Read 11 tweets
19 Jan
Following up on @thejackbeyer's find, I can confirm that Deimos and Phobos are the names of two oil rigs purchased by SpaceX – likely for conversion to support Starship operations.

ENSCO 8500 and ENSCO 8501 were the previous names of the rigs. They are nearly identical twins.
BOOM!
Both rigs were purchased by Lone Star Mineral Development LLC which is either a SpaceX subsidiary or a subsidiary of a company that SpaceX is leasing the rigs from (like SpaceX does with the droneships).
Read 10 tweets
19 Jan
If you think we didn't do a quick Google search, go "hey, this actually might be related to the Shell Deimos project," you are wrong. We did. It is not related.
Furthermore, ENSCO 8500 and ENSCO 8501 (aka Valeris 8500 and Valeris 8501) were sold to an undisclosed buyer this summer.

energyglobalnews.com/valaris-sells-…
Is the undisclosed buyer SpaceX? I have found no indisputable evidence other than a Deimos sign appearing on the side of the rig (spotted by @thejackbeyer). So yes, there is some uncertainty, but it seems very possible.
Read 4 tweets
29 Sep 20
Watch Live: Crew-1 overview briefing

@JimBridenstine notes that this mission will allow for 3x as much science on the Space Station due to increased crew capacity.
@KathyLueders: A culmination of a lot of work to get to this point. Excited for a Halloween launch.
Read 12 tweets
23 Sep 20
Looks like SpaceX may be making a pressurize to failure attempt.

Watch Live: Image
Tons of condensation coming from the bottom now. This might finally be happening. Still could have an issue at any time of course, but looking promising!
After something like 18 hours of streaming, FROST IS FORMING! Image
Read 4 tweets
13 Aug 20
SpaceX was awarded its first launch of NSSL Phase 2 for $316 million. ULA was awarded its first two launches for a total of $337 million.

Elon states that this price disparity was because SpaceX was not given $967 million in development funding like ULA.
The lack of development funding means that SpaceX has to price funding for a Mobile Service Tower, extended payload fairing, etc into their pricing for NSSL Phase 2.
I wonder if this could have hurt SpaceX's NSSL Phase 2 bid, as their pricing probably ended up being very similar to ULA. Thus, SpaceX's usual advantage on cost might have been wiped away.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(