Inside ‘chaotic & crowded’ Wuhan labs which may have unleashed Covid
Billy Bostickson, an anonymous researcher from DRASTIC & Yvette Ghannam, compiled a damning 60-page report on the labs.
2. DISASTER ZONE!
Bostickson and Ghannam confirmed the errors "support the possibility of a lab leak" of Covid, "either via an experimental animal or an infected researcher at one of the Wuhan University laboratories".
3. DISASTER ZONE!
"The authors noted another disturbing finding at the nearby Wuhan Institute of Biological Products. During their investigation into the facility, they found its sewage & drainage systems were damaged and old, "potentially contaminating local canals and creeks"
4. DISASTER ZONE!
Shocking biosecurity lapses spanning over 40 years!
And now a detailed examination of a host of other labs in Wuhan which carry out coronavirus research on bats has revealed a catalogue of shocking errors.
5. What the Monkey Saw in Wuhan
and even he was shocked at the mess!
6. Our 3rd report hotlinked in the SUN article
Researchers have uncovered a number of unnerving biosafety hazards at the WIV, the Wuhan Institute of Biological Products, the Wuhan Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, and Wuhan University.
And they say suspicion does need to be just on WIV - but potentially all the labs in Wuhan need to come under scrutiny in the hunt for Covid's origins.
8. In 2019, just months before the deadly virus started spreading across the world, an inspection of the labs at Wuhan University revealed how the rooms were filled with "lots of debris", there were no safety facilities, and students did not wear lab coats.
9. Researchers also revealed the whopping size of the animal experimentation centre at the WIV, where suspicions have grown over the origins of the pandemic.
Built in 1996, the 1,216 m2 facility contains 3,268 cages of live animals, including 12 ferret cages and 12 bat cages.
10. Live Bats
The lab captures bats from the wild to be used as experimental animals, the researchers said - with video this week appearing to be the first to show the live creatures at WIV.
11. 'ACCIDENTAL LEAK'
"At least three laboratories were actively involved in studies of bat coronaviruses and/or bat sampling activities without the use of proper PPE in the years leading up to the Covid-19 pandemic," Bostickson and Ghannam said.
"
12. Three Laboratories
"These three laboratories are thus considered potential sources for accidental leaks whether within the laboratory or during field sampling expeditions."
13. Whistleblowers, Documents and Subpoenas
Speaking to The Sun Online, Bostickson said the study provides more circumstantial evidence of a lab leak
"We need more whistleblowers, more internal documents, we need Daszak & others to be subpoenaed & questioned"
14. You never know...
Asked whether a lab leak could have been accidental or intentional, Bostickson said:" I don't think [it was] deliberate but you never know."
15. "DRASTIC never only focused on WIV..."
Gilles Demaneuf, a data analyst from DRASTIC, told The Sun Online the WIV is a "good contender" for the source of the lab leak - but it could have emerged from one of a number of labs in Wuhan.
Richard H Ebright, professor of chemistry & chemical biology at Rutgers University, also said staff working on projects around bat SARS-related coronaviruses at the WIV were poorly protected & there was a lax approach to biosecurity @R_H_Ebright
17. Prof Ebright said:
"they used PPE, usually just gloves; sometimes not even gloves & safety standards were usually just BSL 2, posing high risk of infection of field-collection, field-survey, or lab staff in contact with a virus having transmission properties of SARS-CoV-2"
18. The Stakes are High!
"Xi Jinping ‘could be OVERTHROWN’ if Wuhan lab leak is proven as world punishes China for Covid chaos"
19. Monkey didn't get BANANAS as usual 🐵🍌😵💫
We pay for your stories!
Do you have a story for The Sun news desk?
Email us at exclusive@the-sun.co.uk or call 0207 782 4104. You can WhatsApp us on 07423 720 250. We pay for videos too
20. Help reanimate the Monkey by donating!
PM me if you've got deep pockets & plenty of bananas!
🍌🍌🍌🍌🍌🍌🍌🍌🍌🍌🍌🍌🍌
21. Link to Article in the SUN...Woops!
DISASTER ZONE Crumbling sewers, no PPE, & filthy cages – Inside ‘chaotic & crowded’ Wuhan labs which may have unleashed Covid
2. Prof Peter Shields, Professor of Medical Oncology at Ohio State University
“This paper does not add anything we do not already know, but selectively cites studies (and omits many others that refute the authors statements throughout) that leads the reader down the wrong path"
3. Prof Peter Shields (2)
“None of their mechanistic studies (selectively cited) has been validated as actual risk predictors in people, and the authors failure to recognize that leads to harmful conclusions."
Critical Examination of 3 Related Studies on SARS-CoV-2 Origins
My latest paper, a pleasantly vicious critique, reveals exactly how the zoonati clique try to bamboozle gullible journalists and scientists to drive their biased narrative of natural originresearchgate.net/publication/40…
2. This core interpretive move by the authors, from failure to detect a shift in selection pressure to claiming strong evidence of “no adaptation being required”, exemplifies the pernicious absence of evidence-based reasoning so characteristic of their tedious papers.
3. Yet, a small cluster of publications from a recurring group of agenda driven authors continues to exert disproportionate and malign influence on the debate over the origins of SARS-COV-2.
1. A truly stunning example of what is called an "ad hoc hypothesis", i.e. a secondary hypothesis added to a theory specifically to save it from being falsified when evidence for its original version is missing or contradictory.
2. They used a modeling framework called RELAX to claim that viruses like SARSCoV2 may already have the ability to infect humans whilst in their natural reservoir, meaning an intermediate host or long-term adaptation wouldn't leave the evolutionary footprints previously expected.
3. A classic post hoc justification for the absence of physical evidence by grant stuffed criminals, in short:
I couldn't find the evidence I said was required, so I've invented a theory that explains why the evidence I failed to find was never actually needed in the first place
1. The long awaited 293 questions for Dr. Ralph Baric have finally been completed and shared! Long live the quest for truth! You are hereby invited to read the sharpest, most lethal 293-question dossier ever built.
1. "These tiny fragments were far smaller than cells and even smaller than many viruses. Some were close to the size of DNA strands. Under high magnification, she noticed small hooked shapes with sharp points.
✴️2. OVERLOOKED
"She realized that the plastic in human brains was not only present, but surprisingly small. The fragments were so tiny that common diagnostic tools could not detect them. Pathologists had likely been overlooking them for years."
"The two original samples showed a strong link between plastic particles and dementia. As Bearer expanded her work to ten more donated brains, she found plastic in every single one. None were free of synthetic fragments."