No. You are wrong. 7.96 lists what is left unprotected after a war and allocates who must take responsibility for them. Hence includes women (because men fought the war).
Manu Smriti 7.97 (very next verse) says that the army gives everything to the ruler+
However after a king wins, the people in defeated territory become his praja (subject) and are protected.
Swami Dayanand writes here that women and children of dead warriors get their property and security from king.
+
Manu Smriti has throughout specified that nothing must happen without woman's consent. 5.149 says only family of woman (with her consent) can decide on her behalf. 7.45-52 prohibit warriors from indulging in women. Chapter 9 describes women must be respected and never forced+
8th chapter of Manu Smriti describes punishments for those who exploit women (by force or even consent like in LJ cases)
8.352 says that they be severely and immediately punished
8.344-351 state that this applies even if accused is guru, child, scholar, friend or rich +
Manu Smriti 8.323 says if someone steals, he may be killed. And if he targets a woman, he may be killed.
Hence, interpreting 7.96 to assume women are war-booty is wrong in context of entire Manu Smriti and Vedas. That is why Shivaji, Rana Pratap never touched women of enemy+
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
जी हाँ। जो सनातन धर्म की आर्य पद्धति में विश्वास रखता है वह पहन सकता है। भारत में अनेक कन्या गुरुकुल हैं जहां बालिकाएँ इसे पहनती हैं। वाराणसी के पाणिनी कन्या गुरकुल ही चले जाइए। सावरकर ने कितने ही जनेऊ यज्ञ किए थे दलितों में।
यह देखिए वीर सावरकर का सर्व जाति जनेऊ यज्ञ। हमारा @agniveer भी सावरकर की प्रेरणा से सर्वत्र जनेऊ संस्कार करवाता है। स्त्री पुरुष सब पहनते हैं। जन्मना जाति नहीं मानते। किंतु कर्म व मानसिकता अवश्य देखते हैं। @thewire_in को धूर्त एवं शठ मानते हैं।
यह देखिए @agniveer का यज्ञ जहाँ सब जनेऊ पहनते हैं। ऐसे सैकड़ों उदाहरण साझा कर सकता हूँ।
आप @thewire_in को छोड़िए। हिंदू घृणा वालों का कुसंग त्यागिये। आपका भी स्वागत है।
Hindi, English, Bengali, Marathi, Telugu and Tamil have more speakers than Urdu in India. (If we consider those who can "read" Urdu, the number will be much lesser)
Why does NCERT then publish books in Urdu? Why there is an Urdu promotion council under Central Govt since 1996?
Some morons justify neglect of Sanskrit by citing number of speakers. This is foolish. 1. Sanskrit is actually the most popular language of India because all Hindus use Sanskrit for religious/ cultural purposes 2. Almost all languages are derivatives of Sanskrit. +
3. Sanskrit is a framework. Technically, a form of Sanskrit can be spoken that is mutually intelligible with other Indian languages. Hence, Sanskrit is the root or the mother, other languages are children. And Urdu is a divisive imposition
There is no evidence of beef in any of the 4 Veda Samhitas. On contrary, there are ample mantras that declare cow as fountainhead of all prosperities. In fact, as per Vedas, nothing must be done to trouble animals.
Refer my book "Hindu's Fight for Mother cow" for details
Thread:
Swami Shraddhanand was star of Satyagraha movement and faced near-death situations to make it success.
However he dissociated from Satyagraha for following reasons: 1. Gandhi accused Satyagrahis for being responsible for being shot by police (like Godhra victims)
2. Lala Shankar Lal was falsely accused of inciting mob to beat a Muslim police officer Faquir Mohammad. Gandhi wired an order asking Shankar Lal to offer no defense. This prejudiced the court against Satyagrahis.
3. Gandhi would sent posters in bulk asking Satyagrahis to get arrested if police wants so. Other experimental posters were also sent (from safe zone).
Swami Shraddhanand had to burn these posters
When Swami Shraddhanand was murdered by Abdul Rashid, Mohandas Gandhi said: "..I have called Abdul Rashid a brother and I repeat it. I do not even regard him as guilty of Swamiji’s murder. Guilty indeed are all those who excited feelings of hatred against one another."
Gandhi had been blaming Swamiji for launching the largest Shuddhi (Ghar Wapsi) movement in history and hence upsetting Islamists.
There is no way I can even pretend to admire a person who makes murderer of my Gurudev his brother. I share same views on Gandhi as BR Ambedkar
Congress party made sure that name of Swami Shraddhanand, the most influential and respected leader of his time to whom even Gandhi owes his brand image, is completely wiped off from education and historical references.