@lamb_wf Transport accounts for 14-15% of global GHG emissions according to the latest figures (2018). Most of it from road transport (11% of global emissions). Aviation is 1.6%.
Road transport is both one of the highest emitting subsectors AND one of the subsectors with the most rapid growth since 2010 (+2% per year)
Global transport emissions have virtually *doubled* since 1990. Also, unlike other sectors, we see growth in pretty much all world regions, *including Europe and North America*. East Asia is absolutely booming.
On why transport emissions have increased in Europe see this report & thread
The road subsector accounted for most growth since 2010 (+1.9% per year), but growth was even faster for inland shipping (+3.2%/yr), domestic aviation (+2.8%/yr) and international aviation (+2.7%/yr).
So why have emissions increased? Transport emissions track GDP growth (& the associated increase in travel activity) pretty closely.
Carbon intensity has remained pretty much stable. Energy intensity has decreased, but not enough to offset travel activity growth.
These are our conclusions re: transport
NB: the aviation emissions calculated in the paper ⬇️ are the total GHGs, not the total warming - which is higher because of other factors. If those factors are taken into account, aviation accounts for a higher share of warming.
Since Israel attacked Iran, German media outlets & journalists of all political persuasions have started questioning international law and or heralding a new age where the law of the strongest applies in international relationships.
The reason why "transport poverty" is suddenly getting attention is ETS 2, which is expected to increase motor fuel prices a lot from 2027, and the associated "Social Climate Fund" which aims at supporting groups that are vulnerable to such price increases.
The Commission outlines a number of eligible measures which Member States can include in their SCF plans to tackle transport poverty
We first review existing cross-sectional evidence on the deteminants of air travel - summarised in this table (which the reviewers didn't like so didn't make it into the final paper :) )
Why it's interesting to use panel data?
1. How travel behaviour changes over the life course is interesting in and of itself
2. It provides better evidence of causality than cross-sectional data
3. Shows which groups & trends are driving rapid growth in air travel
Having grown up in Berlusconi's Italy, I can feel it in my bones that when they win the first time, it's tough, but when they win *again*, after all they've demonstrated, *that's* the really hard one to take
When it happens the first time, you can think "This is an aberration, this was a tantrum, people don't really stand behind this, this is not who we are". The second time around really brings home that yes, this is what many of "us" are & stand for.
But in a way, it cures you from populism. No there is no innocent, well-intentioned mass of people who have been misled. We live in liberal democracies with a lot of people who fundamentally reject key principles of liberal democracy.