A lot of parents are asking me whether if a school tells your child to self isolate there is a legal duty for them to do so (meaning that you could be given a fixed penalty notice or charged with an offence if you do not comply)
I am actually going to change what I said in the original thread - an be a bit less equivocal. I think that it is entirely possible that the legal duty to self isolate and would be triggered as school could be engaged by a local authority in communicable disease control. Image
As with all things Covid regulations, the answer is not particularly clear!
It's actually very bad that it isn't clear whether the parents of hundreds of thousands of children having to self-isolate are subject to a legal duty (ie can be given a fixed penalty notice or charged) or not
I read the schools guidance (gov.uk/government/pub…). I am not convinced the govt think schools telling children to self-isolate triggers a legal duty.

"Anyone told to isolate by NHS Test & Trace or by their public health protection team has a legal obligation to self-isolate" ImageImageImage
It's pretty obvious from the guidance that "NHS Test and Trace or ... their public health protection team" relates to the "relevant person" test under the self-isolation regulations

legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/1045… Image
A school could, in theory, be "a person employed or engaged by a local authority in communicable disease control" but that sounds quite narrow ("a person") and I doubt parliament intended for it to capture every school in the country - could have easily said that if so.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam Wagner

Adam Wagner Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AdamWagner1

1 Jul
Police breached 'fundamental rights' at Sarah Everard and Kill the Bill protests, parliamentary inquiry finds news.sky.com/story/police-b…
Here is the full report

Finds multiple serious failings in the way that police handled Clapham Common vigil and Bristol protest

A common finding was police applied a “presumption of illegality” and did not properly account for the right to protest

static1.squarespace.com/static/6033d65… ImageImageImageImage
Accuses the police of using disproportionate and excessive force at the events.
Read 5 tweets
30 Jun
One thing that I have been saying for a long time is that the problem of making laws by ministerial decree is that it makes them far more open to corruption. I don’t necessarily mean corruption in the sense of people enriching themselves (though that may have happened!)…
… I mean the banality of everyday corruption. The evidence with the Covid regulations is how many times exceptions seems to have been made for “friends of the government”. The exception for grouse shooting, for foreign travel to buy a property, the exception now to…
the self isolation rules for (quite literally) big business people. The worry I have always had is not the exceptions we know about but the ones we don’t, how many times did someone knock on the door or send a WhatsApp message and get a change to the law?
Read 4 tweets
25 Jun
I appreciate some will see the Hancock story as a private affair - but there is an important question of whether the Health Secretary broke his own lockdown laws

As I explain 👇🏼, private indoor meetings between people not living together were unlawful for most of the past year
The Sun photo was apparently taken on 3 May, when lockdown was in Step 2.

Gatherings of 2 or more indoors were illegal except for permitted purposes

One purpose was "work" which would cover being together at work but arguably not for this purpose

Were they meeting up before this? The Sun suggests they were.

If they were at work, they might argue this fell within the work exception but I think - especially for Health Secretary - that's not a good argument.

If they went elsewhere to meet up, that would clearly be illegal
Read 6 tweets
23 Jun
Lord Sumption makes a convincing argument in the new Law Quarterly Review that Dolan was wrongly decided and use of the Public Health Act to impose lockdowns was contrary to the principle of legality

It's behind a paywall so I can't post a direct link sweetandmaxwell.co.uk/Product/Academ…
I'll post this though

He may be right. I wonder if time will tell? Hard to see this issue going back in front of the Supreme Court but maybe
Oh and this
Read 4 tweets
23 Jun
🚨⚽️Amendment to travel regulations in force yesterday

The Health Protection (Coronavirus, International Travel and Operator Liability) (England) (Amendment) (No. 3) Regulations 2021

People with a "Euro 2020 invite" avoid self-isolation/hotel quarantine
legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2021/731/…
Remember this story? That is what this is about

theguardian.com/football/2021/…
Basically, anyone who falls within these categories is exempt from both the requirement to self-isolate and the hotel quarantine rules
Read 13 tweets
22 Jun
I am popping up on #TheMoralMaze tomorrow. Listen to @BBCRadio4 from 1pm
Sorry, it’s on at 8 this evening not 1 bbc.co.uk/programmes/m00…
This is the topic
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(