This long tweet 🧵 is mainly for my PCA colleagues who are meeting at our denominational assembly. As we gather, I believe it is wrong to dismiss the concerns of “conservatives” in the PCA [quote marks because the whole PCA is very conservative] who want to be vigilant 1/7
in a culture that is moving into a more highly secular, and anti-religious direction. It’s right to assume that such a pervasive, anti-Christian culture may have a powerful influence on especially our younger generations. Its also right to assume that the cultural winds are 2/7
against orthodox, evangelical Christianity and that it will be very difficult to thrive and grow as a denomination going forward. As a whole body, we should be talking about this—how will we convert people and grow as a faithful communion in a culture like the one that is 3/7
forming now? We should not be fighting each other but working on this question together. But we must be careful of not bringing into the PCA the talking points and the terminology of political secular conservatism or secular progressivism, which can be found in their respective 4
media and social media worlds. This will divide us too. The only solution is, in in all our interactions, to stay extremely close to the Bible and our confessions, and ground everything we say and do in them. If you worry about “CRT”—provide biblical or confessional 5/7
categories to define what you mean. If you call for “justice” be sure to root it in close readings of specific Scriptural passages where the word is used. Lets let the Bible & our theology critique the full range of political ideologies behind our current cultural polarization
so we do not allow the Church of Jesus Christ to be pawns in any particular secular political war. 7/7
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For PCA friends at the 2021 GA. WLC 151 says these sins are more “heinous in God’s sight” than others- Paragraph 1: if the person doing the sin should know better or is a visible bad example to others. Paragraph 2: If the parties more immediately offended are—1/8
God, Christ, the Holy Spirit, leaders, the weak, and the communal common good. Paragraph 3: If the sin itself—a) breaks many express biblical commandments at once; b) is not merely a desire but is acted upon so that “reparations” cannot be made; 2/8
c) is against laws obvious not only to Christians but to general reason (“the light of nature”) and society (“civil punishments”); d) is against specific covenants and vows made to God and men; e) if done deliberately, obstinately, frequently/continuously, boastingly, and 3/8
Thread: There seem to be basically two kinds of critics of evangelicals. “A-Critics” say evangelicals have done wrong because they HAVE NOT lived up to their own theology. Their theology is largely good and right, but it should be practiced consistently. 1/6
Sadly, American evangelicals have allowed hyper-individualism, misogyny, uncritical nationalism, anti-intellectualism, legalism, etc to mute and distort or smother its historic doctrinal commitments. 2/6
“B-Critics” say evangelicals have done wrong because they HAVE lived up to their theology—that it IS wrong. Evangelical belief in the infallibility of the Bible, the necessity of faith in Christ for salvation, the need to be born again-should be abandoned because they're toxic. 3
Only 60% of American evangelicals (believers in the Bebbington quadrilateral) are white, and less than 10% of world evangelicals are American. Increasingly, world evangelical leadership is non-white. Don't let some white American fundamentalists define an entire world movement.
It is imperialistic to say that because of the actions of American fundamentalists--others around the world who define themselves as evangelicals are now not allowed to.
Part 4. Last 🧵: Bail’s book Breaking the Social Media Prism argues that social media is a ‘prism’ because it distorts our identities—not only as individuals—but as a society. It makes extremists seem (to themselves and others) greater than they are, and moderates more marginal
than they are. In order to ‘hack the prism’ (chapter 8) we need to change behaviors that lead to the distortions: (1) Don’t engage someone you just began to follow. Take time to patiently listen to them for a while in order to do the next two things. (2) As much as possible use
their vocabulary and terms rather than those of your own tribe. (3) Use arguments that build on and ‘resonate with the worldviews of the people you are trying to persuade.’ Rather than saying, “I am all right and you are all wrong” say— “You believe this. Great!...3/5
Part 3 🧵: Social media mutes moderates because they are often people with stronger off-line identities than extremists and spend less time on it. While extremists can only gain status and belonging on-line, moderates have much status and belonging to lose:
(1) Moderates fear saying something that will anger co-workers or family or friends. (2) They get the impression from social media that the middle is vanishing and so it is useless to speak--but statistically political moderates are not shrinking.
(3) They are often attacked with enormous vitriol as moderates. Their arguments are not answered—rather people attack them either with ‘bad faith’ readings—construing the statement in the worst way possible—or attacking their social location or identity
Part 2 🧵: Social media drives extremism and mutes moderation. (1) 6% of all Twitter users generate 20% of all tweets. But 70% of all tweets they mention are about national politics. These 6% are mostly extremists. (p. 76)
(2) Research has shown that those taking extreme cultural/political positions “often lack status in their off-line lives” and have experienced marginalization. (3) Also their on-line personas are often far different more aggressive) than are their personalities off-line. (p.56)
(4) They are usually strongly opposed to being identified as extremist (tho they are, objectively) and therefore prefer to attack moderates on their own side. Why? (5) By attacking moderates as being unprincipled compromisers or “really” stealth members of the other side—