M.A. Franklin Profile picture
Jun 30, 2021 22 tweets 4 min read Read on X
Sexual debauchery leads to the collapse of a civilization within 3 generations.

TLDR: The sexual revolution was a mistake. A poison. It unleashed termites into the foundation of the west.

How do we know this?

Read on.

/ THREAD
Oxford anthropologist J.D. Unwin studied 86 societies and civilizations to see if there was a relationship between sexual morality and human flourishing.

What did he find?

This thread is a summary of a summary. Read to the end for the full article with additional resources.
First, Unwin defined four categories of cultures. Each is differentiated in their pursuit of art, engineering, literature, agriculture, etc.

1. Dead - these cultures are only focused on the day-to-day needs of life. They don't care about higher questions and so do not progress.
2. Superstitious - these cultures develop beliefs that help them explain the natural world. This can be represented in the special treatment of the dead.

3. Deistic - characterized by belief in gods or a god. This requires more imagination and higher-order thinking.
4. Rationalistic - characterized by rational thinking. This was the category with the most human flourishing.

Next, Unwin defined sexual ethics and restraint into two categories:
- Prenuptial - this was measured on a scale from complete sexual freedom to "remain a virgin until married."

- Postnuptial - how easy is it to get a divorce? How many wives can a man have? How faithful are the women expected to be?

What did he find?
The single most influential factor: prenuptial chastity.

If people were expected to remain virgins until they were married, the culture was more likely to have all of the markers of human flourishing.

They were more likely to be an "advanced" civilization.
The best combination, resulting in a culture that exceeds other cultures?

You probably won't be surprised.

Prenuptial chastity combined with absolute monogamy. Absolute monogamy means one spouse for life.
Why was prenuptial chastity the most important?

In cultures where virginity was no longer expected, within three generations the following disappeared:

- absolute monogamy
- deism
- rational thinking
Virginity before marriage is literally one of the prerequisites for modern civilization.

Without it, people usually regress into the lowest "dead" category as they become interested only in their own wants and needs. They become slaves to their appetites.
Cultures that have embraced total sexual freedom collapse within three generations.

They might limp along for a time, powered by some momentum, but eventually, they are conquered or taken over by another culture.
In the West, the sexual revolution started in the late 1960's. Three generations from then would put us in the 2070's.

Are we on the way to collapse?

The evidence points to "yes."
You cannot have both sexual freedom and progress.

Unwin: "Any human society is free to choose either to display great energy or to enjoy sexual freedom; the evidence is that it cannot do both for more than one generation."
Marriage is not just a private contract between two individuals. It has ramifications for the entire community and culture.

And what two (or more) people do together in the bedroom is not, indeed, a private matter. Writ large, it has consequences for that entire civilization.
Porn is cultural cancer. It rots the bones.

A healthy civilization, or one that wants to progress, will want to eradicate it or push it to the fringes of society.
This is one reason why Christendom has produced some vibrant cultures. It's sexual ethic.

The Gospel really is a leaven that gradually leavens the whole loaf.

Any culture that embraces Christianity will eventually rise up.

Can you imagine the vitality of a Christian China?
A culture can be turned around, so there is always hope. Massive repentance can bear fruit.

But based on the data, it also takes three generations for improvements to start showing up.

Sexual ethics is a powerful rudder, but it is still a rudder on a huge, lumbering ship.
Unwin's work also lines up with other literature on male sexual energy and how it must be contained and directed in order for a culture to thrive.

May we heed the warning.
For more details, check out @KirkDurston and his article on Unwin's work. Durston also provides a PDF full of notes on Unwin's book if you want to dive deeper.

kirkdurston.com/blog/unwin?fbc…
Another article draws similar conclusions from an understanding of human nature. From @TellYourSonThis

illimitablemen.com/2015/08/26/pro…
If you found this thread, you'll also find the Foundation Father newsletter helpful.

I send out practical tips every week dealing with fatherhood, culture, and homeschooling.

Sign up now and you'll get a free gift.

foundationfather.com/subscribe/
@TellYourSonThis There might be hope!

There is evidence that the current generation is reversing the trend the Boomers started.

63% of minors currently reside with both birth parents.

By the grace of God, maybe the West is not doomed.

lifenews.com/2021/06/28/num…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with M.A. Franklin

M.A. Franklin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FoundationDads

May 12
Good women are to be dangerous, but not in the same way as men.

A kingdom, a city, a household with a Biblical queen on the ramparts is a beacon of strength to her king, and a terrible visage to her enemies. And warfare requires more than weapons and soldiers.

Here are 11 ways to raise dangerous daughters.

1. Tell your daughters they are beautiful.

If your daughters don’t think they are beautiful, it’s your fault. They should hear this truth from their father often. Too many girls are crippled by insecurity, and an insecure girl will not grow up to be a dangerous woman.Image
2. Teach your daughters to be modest.

This is more than just clothes and dress, but modesty is not less than that. A girl should not place her worth in how much attention she can attract. She has better things to focus on.
3. Teach your daughters to be quiet and gentle.

The world wants your daughters to be brash and abrasive. To speak loudly. To reach out and grab what is rightfully theirs like a toddler reaching for a cookie.

In refusing to be quiet and gentle, a woman is giving up a large source of her power. She is reaching for a weapon that she cannot wield, though it may feel good to pretend for a time.
Read 11 tweets
May 8
You want your boys to be dangerous.

They are squires. Knights in training.

This doesn’t mean that they only know how to physically fight. It means they can face danger when it is called for, in whatever form it happens to take.

A boy who is not dangerous will not be able to protect anything. He will not be able to ascend to any sort of manhood.

How do you raise sons that will grow up to be dangerous men?

Here are 11 ways:Image
1. Don’t tell your sons to be careful. Tell them to pay attention.

Expect your boys to be wild and get hurt. This is the glory of being a young boy. Skinned knees are an honor. Broken bones are a garland.

You should want to temper this wildness with wisdom, of course, but know that nothing is wrong with your sons just because they are reckless.

That just means they are unpolished, unprocessed iron ore.
2. Push your sons to expand their comfort zone.

Your sons must get used to going into new territory. This will serve them well for the rest of their lives. They will be able to walk into new situations and, if not conquer them, at least surveil with confidence.

Fear and nervousness are ok as long as he pushes through.
Read 12 tweets
Apr 15
In 1841, Scottish journalist Charles Mackay detailed how entire nations lose their minds at the same time.

From financial manias to holy wars and everything in between.

His conclusion? Men think in herds. They go mad in herds.

They recover their senses slowly, and one by one.

You think you're too smart to fall for a scam? You aren't. (thread) 🧵Image
Mackay studied the madness across centuries and cultures. The same mechanism repeated every time.

A nation fixates on one object. Gold. Tulips. Land. Crusade. Witch trials.

Millions become simultaneously impressed with a single delusion and chase it until something shinier comes along.

What does the cycle look like?
The pattern has four stages:

1. A plausible story emerges. Just credible enough to hook the ambitious.

2. Early winners appear. Their success silences the skeptics.

3. The entire population joins. Nobles, merchants, servants, clergy. Nobody wants to be left behind.

4. The floor disappears. Those who got in last are ruined. The few who got out early hide their wealth from their neighbors.

What made these manias so devastating? 👇
Read 19 tweets
Apr 13
In 1784, the French government sent Benjamin Franklin and Antoine Lavoisier to investigate a man who claimed he could cure any disease by waving his hands.

Thousands of Parisians believed his claims. Even the queen endorsed him.

What the commission found is a warning for every age.

"Trust the experts" has always been used to exploit the credulous. (thread) 🧵
The man was Franz Mesmer.

He arrived in Paris in 1778, claiming he had discovered an invisible magnetic fluid that pervaded all nature. He could channel it through his hands and into the sick, and doing so could cure anything.

A prominent physician named D'Eslon converted to his cause. From that moment, magnetism became the fashion in Paris.
His method was simple:

1. Claim access to an invisible force that only you understand.

2. Surround yourself with the trappings of authority.

3. Target the anxious, the credulous, and especially women in distress.

4. Produce dramatic emotional reactions and call them "cures."

That was the entire playbook. Very similar to faith healers today.
Read 14 tweets
Apr 9
Western civilization is not declining. It is already dead. What you are living in is the corpse.

In 1918, a German philosopher studied every civilization that collapsed and found they all shared one trait in the final stage:

The population stops having children.

And it stops having children because it no longer sees the point.

His work was mocked, dismissed, and debated by 400 scholars. But he was right (thread) 🧵Image
Schoolteacher Oswald Spengler published his work that rejected the idea that history moves in a straight line from "primitive" to "progress."

He called this the Ptolemaic view of history. We place ourselves at the center and assume everything is building toward us. A form of chronological snobbery.

He offered a more Copernican view: every great civilization is its own world. Egypt, China, India, Babylon, Greece, Rome, the West. Each one blooms and dies according to the same pattern.

None is the "goal" of another.
There is a difference between a Culture and a Civilization.

A Culture is the living, creative phase. It produces cathedrals, great art, deep philosophy, genuine faith. It is rooted in the soil.

A Civilization is the dying phase. It produces world-cities, money-worship, sterile intellectualism, and imperial expansion. It is rootless.

Every Culture eventually hardens into a Civilization.

And every Civilization eventually collapses.
Read 16 tweets
Apr 6
Harvard's first chairman of sociology, Pitirim Sorokin, spent decades analyzing every major civilization in recorded history to answer one question:

Why do great cultures die?

His answer, published in 1941, predicted almost everything happening today.

Down to the collapse of the family, the death of art, and the rise of tyrants. Maybe even the popularity of TikTok.

(thread) 🧵Image
Sorokin identified three types of culture that every civilization cycles through:

1. Ideational — Reality and value are rooted in the supersensory. God is the organizing principle. Art, law, science, and family all serve the Absolute.

2. Idealistic — A synthesis. The supersensory and the sensory are blended. Think fifth-century Athens or thirteenth-century Christendom. Noble, selective, and sublime.

3. Sensate — Only what you can see, hear, smell, touch, and taste is real. Everything beyond the senses is dismissed as fiction.

Every great culture moves through these phases.

The question is: which phase are we in now?
Western civilization entered its Sensate phase around the sixteenth century (around the Enlightenment)

The only true reality is what the senses can detect, absolute empiricism. Everything else — God, the soul, absolute moral law — is superstition or irrelevant.

From this single premise, Sorokin traced the transformation of every sector of culture: art, science, ethics, law, family, government, and economics.

All of them reorganized around one idea: the sensory world is all there is. 👇
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(