Sexual debauchery leads to the collapse of a civilization within 3 generations.
TLDR: The sexual revolution was a mistake. A poison. It unleashed termites into the foundation of the west.
How do we know this?
Read on.
/ THREAD
Oxford anthropologist J.D. Unwin studied 86 societies and civilizations to see if there was a relationship between sexual morality and human flourishing.
What did he find?
This thread is a summary of a summary. Read to the end for the full article with additional resources.
First, Unwin defined four categories of cultures. Each is differentiated in their pursuit of art, engineering, literature, agriculture, etc.
1. Dead - these cultures are only focused on the day-to-day needs of life. They don't care about higher questions and so do not progress.
2. Superstitious - these cultures develop beliefs that help them explain the natural world. This can be represented in the special treatment of the dead.
3. Deistic - characterized by belief in gods or a god. This requires more imagination and higher-order thinking.
4. Rationalistic - characterized by rational thinking. This was the category with the most human flourishing.
Next, Unwin defined sexual ethics and restraint into two categories:
- Prenuptial - this was measured on a scale from complete sexual freedom to "remain a virgin until married."
- Postnuptial - how easy is it to get a divorce? How many wives can a man have? How faithful are the women expected to be?
What did he find?
The single most influential factor: prenuptial chastity.
If people were expected to remain virgins until they were married, the culture was more likely to have all of the markers of human flourishing.
They were more likely to be an "advanced" civilization.
The best combination, resulting in a culture that exceeds other cultures?
You probably won't be surprised.
Prenuptial chastity combined with absolute monogamy. Absolute monogamy means one spouse for life.
Why was prenuptial chastity the most important?
In cultures where virginity was no longer expected, within three generations the following disappeared:
- absolute monogamy
- deism
- rational thinking
Virginity before marriage is literally one of the prerequisites for modern civilization.
Without it, people usually regress into the lowest "dead" category as they become interested only in their own wants and needs. They become slaves to their appetites.
Cultures that have embraced total sexual freedom collapse within three generations.
They might limp along for a time, powered by some momentum, but eventually, they are conquered or taken over by another culture.
In the West, the sexual revolution started in the late 1960's. Three generations from then would put us in the 2070's.
Are we on the way to collapse?
The evidence points to "yes."
You cannot have both sexual freedom and progress.
Unwin: "Any human society is free to choose either to display great energy or to enjoy sexual freedom; the evidence is that it cannot do both for more than one generation."
Marriage is not just a private contract between two individuals. It has ramifications for the entire community and culture.
And what two (or more) people do together in the bedroom is not, indeed, a private matter. Writ large, it has consequences for that entire civilization.
Porn is cultural cancer. It rots the bones.
A healthy civilization, or one that wants to progress, will want to eradicate it or push it to the fringes of society.
This is one reason why Christendom has produced some vibrant cultures. It's sexual ethic.
The Gospel really is a leaven that gradually leavens the whole loaf.
Any culture that embraces Christianity will eventually rise up.
Can you imagine the vitality of a Christian China?
A culture can be turned around, so there is always hope. Massive repentance can bear fruit.
But based on the data, it also takes three generations for improvements to start showing up.
Sexual ethics is a powerful rudder, but it is still a rudder on a huge, lumbering ship.
Unwin's work also lines up with other literature on male sexual energy and how it must be contained and directed in order for a culture to thrive.
May we heed the warning.
For more details, check out @KirkDurston and his article on Unwin's work. Durston also provides a PDF full of notes on Unwin's book if you want to dive deeper.
A Colombian philosopher spent 80 years writing fragments that read like prophecies.
Known as the "Nietzsche from the Andes," he rarely left his library and published books that almost no one read.
His name was Nicolás Gómez Dávila, and he would have dominated X. Some bangers:🧵
“In an age in which the media broadcast countless pieces of foolishness, the educated man is defined not by what he knows, but by what he doesn't know.”
You'll be more informed about current events by reading old books than by watching the news.
“Hierarchies are celestial. In hell, all are equal.”
Egalitarians hate beauty, and so wherever they are, hell follows.
is often celebrated or dismissed as environmentalist propaganda. This misconception is understandable. The film pummels the audience from the opening credits with a cartoonish version of human waste, prodigality, and corporate excess.
Towers of trash have replaced skyscrapers and the earth is bereft of all life except for robots and cockroaches.
If you asked a 6-year-old what the Earth would look like if adults kept littering, he might draw a similar picture.
For anyone not among Gaia’s faithful idolaters, the whole thing feels like you’re about to be scolded by your third-grade teacher for exhaling too much carbon dioxide, so I can forgive viewers who roll their eyes at the premise.
A recent study highlighted what everyone already knows, deep down.
Divorce places a generational curse on its children. The effects last for years, and unless someone stops the bleeding, they are passed down to the grandchildren.
Divorce is bad even for adult children.
Household income plummets by 50% and never fully recovers, even after a decade.
Kids who experience a divorce at a younger age are more adversely affected, surprising no one.
What does every culture in the history of the world have in common?
None of them treat men and women equally. All of them have different roles for men and women.
ALL of them.
Here are the 4 patterns they all have in common:
1. Sexual division of labor.
Every culture divides tasks between men and women. These tasks can change from culture to culture (though there is remarkable consistency), but the division is always there.
The types of tasks men perform across cultures are similar. Same for women.
2. Complementary roles in the communal and domestic spheres.
Every culture, past and present, assigns men the primary responsibility for the larger community (government and larger groups) and women the primary responsibility for domestic affairs and the rearing of children.
Peter Jackson committed many sins against Tolkien. None worse than his butchery of Aragorn.
The books show us a KING who knows exactly who he is.
The films gave us a whimpering man questioning his birthright.
One commands respect. The other begs for validation. (thread) 🧵
Book Aragorn has no character arc.
This was intentional.
From the moment we meet Strider at the Prancing Pony to his coronation, he knows who he is.
The story gradually reveals his greatness to others, not to himself. Aragorn is a constant anchor for other characters to grasp.
When confronting the Riders of Rohan, book Aragorn declares: "I am Aragorn, son of Arathorn, heir of Isildur, Elendil's son of Gondor. Here is the Sword that was Broken and is forged again!"
The riders bow in awe.
The film? A tired wanderer with nothing special to offer.