Even if the @EBA_News headlines tries its best, it’s hard to find bad news in their latest risk dashboard on European banks: capital is up, NPLs are down, profitability jumped sharply…
@EBA_News When you think about it, it’s crazy how the Covid fears were exaggerated (more on why below.) I mean, look at this: even the most affected sector only saw a very modest rise in NPLs. A 25% scenario would not have been absurd! We're barely at 9% vs 8% in Q1 2020.
@EBA_News Payment holidays on loans are in freefall, with meaningful # only remaining in Spain, Italy or Portugal.
@EBA_News And what’s happening to expired ones? Can borrowers repay?
Well, there are NPLs, of course, but tbh the amounts are very modest and way lower than expectations from a year ago.
1/🧵The big banking question these days: “is private credit a systemic risk” with some comparing it to subprime crisis.
How deep in it are banks ? Data is very hard to find but luckily the Financial Stability Board just dropped its report on private credit. 9 charts that matter
2/ How big is private credit? That’s the fascinating question and the FSB is right to say we don’t know bc there’s no definition.
Estimates range from ~$1.5tn to $50tn depending on what you count.
So pick a number, any number.
3/ More importantly the chart we've been waiting YEARS for: how much do banks actually lend to private credit funds, globally? Answer: <0.3% of bank assets even in the UK (the "leader"). Every shadow-banking-contagion thinkpiece should reflect on this.
1) You might have missed it but the EU just published the CMDI package – one of the most consequential pieces of bank regulation. It fixes something that has been really embarrassing about European banking regulation for more than a decade. And the impacts are huge.
2. What was the problem: the resolution framework (i.e. how do we deal with bank failures) lies on a legal pillar, the No Creditor Worse Off principle which means gvts can play with property rights ONLY if creditors would have been worse off (or =) in a bankruptcy.... BUT
3. But we had one resolution framework and… 27 different creditor hierarchies in a 27-member single market! How big a problem is this ?
1/13 Fed Governor Bowman just dropped her US bank reform blueprint – on top of the “easy” headline you’ve all seen (less capital), there’s some pretty important stuff in there. A thread.
2) Something most analysts missed is that Bowman clearly wants assets BACK inside the regulated banking system. She said it multiple times. The shadow banking era had a good run, but the sheriff is back in town.
3/13 Non-bank lenders, private credit funds, money market vehicles — she's not naming names but the subtext is clear: if you're doing bank-like things outside a bank, the new rules are designed to make that less attractive. The moat is being rebuilt.
This is an opportunity for a bit of bond market education😊
You’ll often read that Italy is wider than France now, or actually the opposite, with people posting various screenshots from different sources to make their point.
An old theme is coming back to haunt them: Basel 4!
Quick thread.
After almost 10y of discussion the package was finally enacted with full implementation in 2033.
Everyone felt, after many EBA reports & banks' disclosures, that impact would be mild.
But for first time banks are publishing capital ratios w/ the new rules and for DB it's ugly
How does it work? Banks are still allowed to use internal models, but the RWA (in 2030/2033) must be at least 72.5% of the standard (non internal models) RWA. ("output floors") and for DB that's a 33% increase!
CET1r would go from 13.8% to 10.35%! Ouch!