📢 HOT OFF THE PRESS: The latest issue of our magazine is here. Though we’ve called it the “Change” issue, it’s really about two things: reflection and empowerment. technologyreview.com/2021/06/30/102…
For far too many of us, the pandemic has been a study in feeling powerless, and we’ve had little time to reflect, @Reillymj writes. We’ve been forced to cope almost constantly with the twisting, morphing uncertainties that life has thrown at us. technologyreview.com/2021/06/30/102…
And yet in this unprecedented environment incredible stories of hope and empowerment have emerged. We see people finding ways to respond to suffering and injustice with positive change.
@sarahljaffe writes that a failed vote to unionize Amazon workers at a facility in Alabama may be discouraging, but around the US, workers in the increasingly expansive tech sector are waking up to their power to organize, and to demand dignity.
In an essay on the arc of progress, @SJasanoff harks back to West Bengal in India, where she was born, and tells how under British rule the region’s thriving industry of woven textiles was crushed by the Industrial Revolution.
The lesson isn’t that technological advancement is bad—it’s that we must take care not to assume that all such change is for the best, or that it comes without costs.
As Jasanoff writes, the good news is that we are not bystanders in the process. We are the ones who create technology, after all; we have the power to choose what gets built and how it is used. technologyreview.com/2021/06/30/102…
This year’s list of 35 Innovators Under 35 is a group of people creating the future before our eyes, from swarms of French-toast size satellites to a pair of budding companies racing to bring optical computing to market. technologyreview.com/innovators-und…
@ScienceHsu wrote about how America is racing to catch up to manufacturers overseas when it comes to support for government funding of high-tech industries like chip fabrication. technologyreview.com/2021/06/30/102…
The price of solar panels has tumbled over the last few decades. With a bit of a boost from further R&D funding and favorable policies, solar stands a real chance of helping decarbonize the planet, @GernotWagner writes. technologyreview.com/2021/06/30/102…
@_KarenHao covered a group of marginalized AI workers who suffered indignities for years in the white-male-dominated field before finding a community. They realized they had the power to challenge the biggest companies to be better and more inclusive. technologyreview.com/2021/06/14/102…
Not yet a subscriber? For $50 per year, you’ll get unlimited access to our journalism and our Webby-nominated newsletter on artificial intelligence, The Algorithm. Your support also helps sustain our mission-driven journalism.
The Olympic and Paralympic games are set to begin on July 23 in Tokyo, where covid-19 cases are rising, prompting the city to announce its fourth state of emergency since the start of the pandemic.
The rising caseload is especially troubling because the country’s vaccination rate remains low, with just 18% of Japan’s population fully vaccinated. nytimes.com/interactive/20…
🧵 A few lonely academics have been warning for years that solar power faces a fundamental challenge that could halt the industry’s breakneck growth. Simply put: the more solar you add to the grid, the less valuable it becomes. technologyreview.com/2021/07/14/102…
The problem is that solar panels generate lots of electricity in the middle of sunny days, frequently more than what’s required, driving down prices—sometimes even into negative territory.
Unlike a natural gas plant, solar plant operators can’t easily throttle electricity up and down as needed, or space generation out through the day, night and dark winter. It’s available when it’s available, which is when the sun is shining.
If you’ve applied for a job lately, it’s all but guaranteed that your application was reviewed by software, in most cases, before a human ever laid eyes on it. This is a thread about episode one of our four-part investigation into the world of automated hiring.
They called it a conspiracy theory. But this postdoctoral research tweeted life into the idea that the virus came from a lab. Here’s a thread about how she did it—and why it matters to the search for the origin of covid-19. technologyreview.com/2021/06/25/102…
.@Ayjchan started asking questions in March 2020. She was chatting with friends on Facebook about the virus spreading out of China. She thought it was strange that people were saying it had come out of a food market. If that was so, why hadn’t anyone found any infected animals?
She wondered why no one was admitting another possibility, which seemed very obvious to her: the outbreak might have been due to a lab accident.
Was the covid-19 pandemic caused by a laboratory accident? A year ago, this idea was denounced as a conspiracy theory. Now, a group of prominent biologists say there needs to be a “safe space” for asking this question. technologyreview.com/2021/05/13/102…
In a letter in the journal @ScienceMagazine, 18 prominent biologists—including the world’s foremost coronavirus researcher—are lending their weight to calls for a new investigation of all possible origins of the virus.
They are also calling on China’s laboratories and agencies to “open their records” to independent analysis.
The hype around “scariants” is overblown, but we also shouldn’t be too complacent. Here are five reasons why you shouldn’t panic about coronavirus variants.
Real-world data out of Qatar suggests that the Pfizer vaccine works quite well, even against B.1.351. Full vaccination offered 75% protection, still “a miracle,” says Andrew Read, a disease ecologist at @PennStateBio.
While scientists testing vaccine efficacy often focus on antibodies, they are only “a very narrow slice” of what the immune response might be, says @drjenndowd. T-cells also help keep infections in check—and there’s data that the vaccines elicit good T-cell responses.