1. SCOTUS' new decision further undermines the Voting Rights Act & KAGAN is not mincing words: "What is tragic
here is that the Court has (yet again) rewritten—in order
to weaken—a statute that stands as a monument to America’s greatness, and protects against its basest impulses"
"Never has a statute done more to advance the Nation’s highest ideals. And few laws are more vital in the current moment. Yet in the last decade, this Court has treated no statute worse."
"Yet efforts to suppress the minority vote continue. No one would know this from reading the majority opinion. It hails the “good news” that legislative efforts had mostly shifted by the 1980s from vote denial to vote dilution."
"The majority’s opinion mostly inhabits a law-free zone. It congratulates itself in advance for giving Section 2’s text
'careful consideration.' And then it leaves that language almost wholly behind."
"In sum, the majority skates over the strong words Congress drafted to accomplish its equally strong purpose: ensuring that minority citizens can access the electoral system as easily as whites."
"By declaring some racially discriminatory burdens inconsequential, and by refusing to subject asserted state interests to serious means-end scrutiny, the majority enables voting discrimination."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Judd Legum

Judd Legum Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JuddLegum

1 Jul
1. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court says Cosby's constitutional rights were violated because he was prosecuted after a DA (Castor) promised that he would never be prosecuted for assaulting Constand.

That can only be true if such a promise EXISTED.
2. The only contemporaneous evidence that it existed is a 2005 press release that includes the following line: "District Attorney Castor cautions all parties to this matter that he will reconsider this decision should the need arise."
3. Apart from that there is not one scrap of paper -- not an email, not a memo, not some notes scribbled on the back of a napkin -- that proves such an agreement existed
Read 6 tweets
30 Jun
1. A lot of misinformation is floating around about the nature of the PA Supreme Court's decision on Cosby.

So I want to clarify a few issues.

Let's talk about EXACTLY WHY the court decided it had to invalidate Cosby's trial.

And why their rationale is very weak
2. First there are a lot of lawyers on Twitter saying the court found there was a type of "contract" between the DA (Castor) and Cosby where the DA promised he would never be prosecuted

The PA Supreme Court court did not find that

The court expressly says there was no contract
3. The court found that there was an UNCONDITIONAL PROMISE from the DA not to prosecute Cosby and that Cosby relied on that promise.

And that, despite the absence of an actual agreement, "fairness" requires that the court to honor this "promise"
Read 13 tweets
30 Jun
1. The PA's Supreme Court decision to release Cosby based on a former prosecutor's "agreement" not to prosecute Cosby and instead grant him immunity from prosecution is not legally sound.

Here's why.
2. PA has a very specific process for being granted immunity from prosecution.

AND IT CANNOT BE GRANTED BY A PROSECUTOR.

Rather, a prosecutor has to ask a court to grant immunity

IN COSBY'S CASE THE PROSECUTOR NEVER ASKED
3. So we are basically going off of the former prosecutor's (and Cosby's) word that such an agreement existed. The record is shaky, but IT DOESN'T MATTER. The prosecutor has no power to immunize Cosby unilaterally
Read 10 tweets
29 Jun
1. @DanCrenshawTX, who has spent years railing against "cancel culture," is calling for any athlete who expresses political views he disagrees with to be expelled from the U.S. Olympic Team

popular.info/p/dropping-the…
@DanCrenshawTX 2. This gets to the heart of the issue about "cancel culture."

There is an underlying issue -- freedom of expression -- that is extremely important

People should not be punished for expressing controversial views

But that's not what its really about

popular.info/p/dropping-the…
3. @DanCrenshawTX's call for Gwen Berry to be kicked off the Olympic team because she has different views on racial justice, shows that Crenshaw is not concerned about freedom of expression.

He's interested in "cancel culture" as a political cudgel

popular.info/p/dropping-the…
Read 5 tweets
29 Jun
Recent claims by Tucker Carlson:

1. The FBI was behind the January 6 insurrection

2. Critical Race Theory will soon result in genocide

3. The NSA is spying on him
It's theoretically possible that the NSA is spying on Tucker Carlson but it's also the kind of claim that you can make and will never be disproven because the NSA is not going to release a statement saying "We are not spying on Tucker Carlson."
Carlson claims that to get to the bottom of it he FILED A FOIA REQUEST WITH THE NSA.

This is brilliant.

In order to get my next big scoop, I'm going to FOIA the NSA and just ask for all info about anyone interesting they've been spying on in the last few years.
Read 4 tweets
28 Jun
1. CRT has been distorted by the right as an all-purpose boogieman to rile up voters.

But it's actually a sophisticated and useful way to understand the cause of persistent racial inequality.

Let's explore how it works in practice.

popular.info/p/1-truth-and-
2. Black people represent 12% of the total population and 33% of the prison population.

Why?

popular.info/p/1-truth-and-…
3. It can't be explained by saying that black people commit more crime.

And "[b]lack and white Americans sell and use drugs at similar rates."

But Black Americans are 6x more likely to be incarcerated for it

popular.info/p/1-truth-and-…
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(