We are fighting against the most concerted state-based effort to undermine Black voting strength since the Civil Rights Mvmt. And in that context, the Supreme Court has again, & w/abandon, shredded a core provision of the Voting Rights Act.
The move is bold. The announcement of a new "test" for vote denial cases - jettisoning the "totality of circumstances" test that has been adjudicated by trial & appellate cts for decades in these cases & replacing it w/a test that put a hand on the scale for "state interests."
The test itself is deeply cynical. First, the bait & switch. While the Shelby Court insisted we must not focus on the past, but must take acct of the new voting landscape, the Court in Brnovich suggests a presumption of validity for voting measures that were in place in 1982.
Then there's the implication that shutting off some avenue for voting can only be assessed by identifying what other avenues are available, while also recognizing that "outright denial of the vote need not be proved."
And then there's the crediting of the "fraud" rationale as a state interest, despite the overwhelming evidence - of which the Court must be well aware - that "voter fraud" is a myth - a rationale employed by state's to restrict voting.
And of course, the projection. The reference to the dissent as engaged in a "radical project." As though the majority's dismantling piece-by-piece the most important & consequential civil rights statute ever enacted is not an extreme & radical exercise of judicial power.
We need new legislation NOW to protect the right to vote. No Senate rule should stand in the way of the right of Black voters to participate as full citizens in political process.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sherrilyn Ifill

Sherrilyn Ifill Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Sifill_LDF

30 May
Bill Bratton knows for sure that this did not happen. In fact in many places, quite the opposite. But this narrative is a convenient one - diverting from the catastrophic failures of police leadership to make necessary changes & from the truth that recruitment is low b/c of that.
And I will keep saying, crime rises when 1) the root causes of violence are not addressed (poverty, joblessness, trauma & abuse) and 2) when violent crimes are not solved. Look at the abysmal clearance rate for murder in most cities.
Violent crimes are not solved by police acting on their own - no matter what you see on TV. It requires the engagement of community members working w public safety ofcrs they trust. Trust is at an all-time low. That’s why police lying, misconduct & brutality drives up crime.
Read 4 tweets
21 May
A nightmare. An absolute nightmare. 7 officers. Grand jury refuses to indict any. That’s how it usually happens. Charging & conviction (as in the case of the ofcr who killed George Floyd) is rare indeed. washingtonpost.com/nation/2021/05…
Can the feds try the ofcrs? They should certainly try. But the fed crim statute (section 242) has a high standard. That’s why the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act would change the standard of illegal ofcr conduct from “willfulness” to “recklessness.”
Can the ofcrs be sued civilly for damages? Sure.Then they’ll raise the defense of qualified immunity. That’s why the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act would end qualified immunity for law enforcement ofcrs, which would give families the chance to hold these ofcrs accountable.
Read 7 tweets
18 May
I’m gonna keep lifting up the students in our amazing first cohort of #MarshallMotley Scholars because I’m peacock proud and because we should all feel encouraged by the commitment and intention of these young people to the South and to civil rights lawyering.
Read 4 tweets
16 May
Sometimes when I’m enjoying a baseball game like tonight (Yanks clobbering the Os) I gasp thinking about how utterly disrespectful, outrageous & deranged it was for Billy Martin to call in Reggie Jackson from the outfield to replace him b/c he thought Reggie was fielding “lazy.”
Also racist as hell. Martin shld have been summarily fired & nvr hired again as a manager. To humiliate this Black man like this before a full stadium & TV audience. That Martin is so often described as “volatile,” & “hot-tempered” when he was unprofessional and out of control.
Just remembering Reggie’s confusion as he ran in; his embarrassment , and everyone just...couldn’t believe it was happening. Ugh.
Read 4 tweets
18 Apr
A cable news host just said “there’s a difference of opinion right now about who is really American” and I feel like I’m going to lose it. What’s the point of the 14th Amend. if we’re going to credit these bananas claims to “Anglo-Saxon” heritage as some indicia of Americanness?
This country chose birthright citizenship (jus solis)& not the (common in Europe) “blood” (jus sanguiness) conception of citizenship in 1868, precisely to secure the legitimacy of citizenship Black ppl here. Yr claim to “Anglo-Saxon” heritage does not increase your legitimacy...
...or claim to Americanness or citizenship. Media please STOP making it as thought this racist, ignorant and uninformed “Anglo-Saxon heritage” mvmt is part of any legitimate debate about who is American and who is not.
Read 5 tweets
30 Mar
Yesterday I participated w/3,000 others in a Bystander Intervention training for discrimination & violence against the AAPI community. Hours earlier in broad daylight in NYC an Asian woman was brutally beaten outside an apt bldg. 2 security guards watched w/o intervening.
The video is nauseating. The assailant who commits this awful act of violence is unrelenting. The two security guards literally close the door to the building. I have seen similar scenes from history of bystanders who turned away. It is a sign of danger for our society.
The perpetrator must be caught and face legal consequences. But the bystanders...I understand these guards have been “suspended” from their work at the building. This must become a moment for teaching & dialogue and change. What are our obligations to each other as human beings?
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(