More research doesn't fix broken intuition, feedback loops, or infighting teams.
"We should delete this policy."
More OKRs, policies, and TPS reports don't translate to more work done. You need better buy-in, planning and monitoring for the few you really care about.
"We shouldn't use our platform for this."
Dogfooding can be a dogshit reason to choose building over buying.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Is #LearnInPublic suitable for everyone?
What if I look dumb?
My answers below, but I'd love to hear yours too!
(DM shared w/ permission)
1/ Learning in Public is *not* “broadcasting everything”. Nobody wants that.
It is about realizing you have a choice to go from 0% to not-0% public. The stuff you do share, you will learn faster, while building a network. It’s up to you to set the boundaries of what you share.
2/ Understanding how to turn your ignorance into power is a key career skill. If you want to grow at all you must make ignorance an old friend, and make friends out of ignorance.
Lean into the discomfort. Become a professional (but responsible) ignoramus
We are besieged by todo lists: Open browser tabs, YouTube Watch Later, Podcast queue, Twitter bookmarks, unread emails, notifs, messages.
Todo lists aren't good enough.
They just solve the easy problem: storage.
Actual Hard Problems: Prioritization and Scheduling
Calendars are todo lists with prioritization and scheduling **built in**. You *have* to answer questions like: "what should I do first?" and "what's my time budget for this?"
Most people's cals only track meetings with others. But why shouldn't we make appointments w/ ourselves?