1/ We need a third way. Post project fundraise, the core problem is information asymmetry. Relying directly on a project to provide all “material” info to the public is hopeless.
https://twitter.com/lex_node/status/1410583993762844672
2/ Project disclosure can and should be crowdsourced to a single location (think: Wikipedia).
Social and legal consequences would be meted out to those found to knowingly have provided misleading information (whoever they may be).
Social and legal consequences would be meted out to those found to knowingly have provided misleading information (whoever they may be).
3/ Digital asset exchanges can be arbiters of the quality of the project information and be responsible for making reasonable determinations about its accuracy and completeness.
No project has a *right* to be listed.
No project has a *right* to be listed.
4/ Those who care about a project (for whatever reason) should coordinate to provide the best available information, with the incentive being better liquidity for the project token.
5/ But what about DEXes, you ask?
There is a way forward there too.
There is a way forward there too.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
